{"title":"回顾性病例-对照研究评估结肠切除术后监测结肠镜检查期间肠道准备质量。","authors":"Stefano Pontone, Giovanni Leonetti, Antonietta Lamazza, Fausto Fiocca, Angelo Filippini, Gianfranco Fanello, Fabrizio Cereatti, Enrico Fiori, Rita Angelini, Gregorio Patrizi, Manuela Brighi, Simone Vetere, Angelo Antoniozzi, Daniele Pironi, Simone Manfredelli, Paolo Pontone","doi":"10.1155/2014/681978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring. </p>","PeriodicalId":89397,"journal":{"name":"ISRN gastroenterology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"681978"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/681978","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Pontone, Giovanni Leonetti, Antonietta Lamazza, Fausto Fiocca, Angelo Filippini, Gianfranco Fanello, Fabrizio Cereatti, Enrico Fiori, Rita Angelini, Gregorio Patrizi, Manuela Brighi, Simone Vetere, Angelo Antoniozzi, Daniele Pironi, Simone Manfredelli, Paolo Pontone\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/681978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"681978\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/681978\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/681978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
目的。手术后用于内窥镜检查的肠道准备可能因肠功能不佳而受损。我们的研究比较了两组患者,以评估结肠切除术对肠道准备的影响。方法。2010年4月至2011年12月,我们将351例患者纳入回顾性研究,分为两组:切除组(RG)和对照组。手术方式分为左半结肠切除术、右半结肠切除术、直肠前切除术和双结肠切除术。由9名熟练的内窥镜医师使用Aronchick量表评估肠道清洁情况。结果。161例RG患者手术情况:左半结肠切除术60例(37%),右半结肠切除术62例(38%),直肠前切除术33例(20%)。不满意的肠道准备在切除人群中明显更高(44%对12%;P值= 0.000)。中间评分无显著差异(38% vs 31%, P值= ns),表明肠道准备质量良好。结论。我们的研究强调了既往结肠切除术患者肠准备不良的高风险。目前,4l PEG基制剂进行的肠道清洁似乎不足以达到切除后内镜监测所需的质量参数。
A Retrospective Case-Control Study Evaluating the Bowel Preparation Quality during Surveillance Colonoscopy after Colonic Resection.
Purpose. Bowel preparation for surveillance endoscopy following surgery can be impaired by suboptimal bowel function. Our study compares two groups of patients in order to evaluate the influence of colorectal resection on bowel preparation. Methods. From April 2010 to December 2011, 351 patients were enrolled in our retrospective study and divided into two homogeneous arms: resection group (RG) and control group. Surgical methods were classified as left hemicolectomy, right hemicolectomy, anterior rectal resection, and double colonic resection. Bowel cleansing was evaluated by nine skilled endoscopists using the Aronchick scale. Results. Among the 161 patients of the RG, surgery was as follows: 60 left hemicolectomies (37%), 62 right hemicolectomies (38%), and 33 anterior rectal resections (20%). Unsatisfactory bowel preparation was significantly higher in resected population (44% versus 12%; P value = 0.000). No significant difference (38% versus 31%, P value = ns) was detected in the intermediate score, which represents a fair quality of bowel preparation. Conclusions. Our study highlights how patients with previous colonic resection are at high risk for a worse bowel preparation. Currently, the intestinal cleansing carried out by 4 L PEG based preparation does not seem to be sufficient to achieve the quality parameters required for the post-resection endoscopic monitoring.