四种重要牙髓治疗材料对1929年成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性评价。

ISRN dentistry Pub Date : 2014-03-03 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2014/191068
Aniket S Wadajkar, Chul Ahn, Kytai T Nguyen, Qiang Zhu, Takashi Komabayashi
{"title":"四种重要牙髓治疗材料对1929年成纤维细胞的体外细胞毒性评价。","authors":"Aniket S Wadajkar,&nbsp;Chul Ahn,&nbsp;Kytai T Nguyen,&nbsp;Qiang Zhu,&nbsp;Takashi Komabayashi","doi":"10.1155/2014/191068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity of direct pulp capping materials such as Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B on L929 fibroblasts. Freshly mixed or set materials were prepared and eluted by incubation with cell culture medium for working time period (fresh) or for 6 hours (set). The cells were exposed to media containing elutes for 24 hours, after which the cell survival was evaluated by MTS assays. In freshly mixed materials, average ± standard deviation % cell viabilities were 40.2 ± 14.0%, 43.7 ± 16.0%, 72.9 ± 12.7%, and 66.0 ± 13.6% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in cell viabilities among material groups, whereas in set materials, the cell viabilities were 48.7 ± 14.8%, 37.2 ± 10.6%, 46.7 ± 15.2%, and 100 ± 21.9% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. Super-Bond C&B showed more cell viabilities than the other three material groups (P < 0.05). The four vital pulp therapy materials had similar cytotoxicity when the materials were fresh. Super-Bond C&B was less cytotoxic than Dycal, Life, and ProRoot MTA after the materials were set, which suggests the use of SB-C&B in future in vivo clinical investigations. </p>","PeriodicalId":89396,"journal":{"name":"ISRN dentistry","volume":"2014 ","pages":"191068"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/191068","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.\",\"authors\":\"Aniket S Wadajkar,&nbsp;Chul Ahn,&nbsp;Kytai T Nguyen,&nbsp;Qiang Zhu,&nbsp;Takashi Komabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/191068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity of direct pulp capping materials such as Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B on L929 fibroblasts. Freshly mixed or set materials were prepared and eluted by incubation with cell culture medium for working time period (fresh) or for 6 hours (set). The cells were exposed to media containing elutes for 24 hours, after which the cell survival was evaluated by MTS assays. In freshly mixed materials, average ± standard deviation % cell viabilities were 40.2 ± 14.0%, 43.7 ± 16.0%, 72.9 ± 12.7%, and 66.0 ± 13.6% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in cell viabilities among material groups, whereas in set materials, the cell viabilities were 48.7 ± 14.8%, 37.2 ± 10.6%, 46.7 ± 15.2%, and 100 ± 21.9% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. Super-Bond C&B showed more cell viabilities than the other three material groups (P < 0.05). The four vital pulp therapy materials had similar cytotoxicity when the materials were fresh. Super-Bond C&B was less cytotoxic than Dycal, Life, and ProRoot MTA after the materials were set, which suggests the use of SB-C&B in future in vivo clinical investigations. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"191068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/191068\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/191068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/191068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

本研究旨在评估Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA、Super-Bond C&B等直接盖髓材料对L929成纤维细胞的细胞毒性。制备新鲜混合或凝固的材料,用细胞培养基孵育工作时间(新鲜)或6小时(凝固)洗脱。将细胞暴露于含洗脱液的培养基中24小时,之后用MTS法评估细胞存活情况。在新鲜混合的材料中,Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA和Super-Bond C&B的细胞存活率平均±标准差分别为40.2±14.0%、43.7±16.0%、72.9±12.7%和66.0±13.6%。Dycal、Life、prooroot MTA和Super-Bond C&B在固定材料中的细胞存活率分别为48.7±14.8%、37.2±10.6%、46.7±15.2%和100±21.9%,不同材料组间细胞存活率无统计学差异。Super-Bond C&B组细胞活力高于其他3个材料组(P < 0.05)。四种重要的牙髓治疗材料在材料新鲜时具有相似的细胞毒性。Super-Bond C&B在材料固化后的细胞毒性低于Dycal, Life和prooroot MTA,这表明SB-C&B可以在未来的体内临床研究中使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.

In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.

In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of four vital pulp therapy materials on l929 fibroblasts.

The aim of this study was to evaluate cytotoxicity of direct pulp capping materials such as Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B on L929 fibroblasts. Freshly mixed or set materials were prepared and eluted by incubation with cell culture medium for working time period (fresh) or for 6 hours (set). The cells were exposed to media containing elutes for 24 hours, after which the cell survival was evaluated by MTS assays. In freshly mixed materials, average ± standard deviation % cell viabilities were 40.2 ± 14.0%, 43.7 ± 16.0%, 72.9 ± 12.7%, and 66.0 ± 13.6% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. There was no statistical difference in cell viabilities among material groups, whereas in set materials, the cell viabilities were 48.7 ± 14.8%, 37.2 ± 10.6%, 46.7 ± 15.2%, and 100 ± 21.9% for Dycal, Life, ProRoot MTA, and Super-Bond C&B, respectively. Super-Bond C&B showed more cell viabilities than the other three material groups (P < 0.05). The four vital pulp therapy materials had similar cytotoxicity when the materials were fresh. Super-Bond C&B was less cytotoxic than Dycal, Life, and ProRoot MTA after the materials were set, which suggests the use of SB-C&B in future in vivo clinical investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信