干扰素γ释放法在临床实践中的应用:对法国某大学医院QuantiFERON-TB处方的回顾。

Magali Briere, Albert Sotto, Marie Audrain, David Boutoille, Virginie Nael, Claire Bernier, Frederique Naudin, Pascale Bemer
{"title":"干扰素γ释放法在临床实践中的应用:对法国某大学医院QuantiFERON-TB处方的回顾。","authors":"Magali Briere,&nbsp;Albert Sotto,&nbsp;Marie Audrain,&nbsp;David Boutoille,&nbsp;Virginie Nael,&nbsp;Claire Bernier,&nbsp;Frederique Naudin,&nbsp;Pascale Bemer","doi":"10.3109/00365548.2014.887221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the clinical use of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) has increased exponentially, while their indications remain controversial given difficulties in interpretation. Four indications were recommended by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) in 2006. We evaluated the utilization of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) test over a 1-y period in a French university hospital and the impact of IGRA results in particular.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QFT-IT tests requested in 2009 were analysed retrospectively, excluding those from the Occupational Health Department, the Regional Tuberculosis Centre, and rheumatology consultations for which the indications were clearly defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and sixty QFT-IT tests were analysed. The interpretation was frequently problematic given the inclusion of a significant proportion of patients over 80 y of age (11%), immunocompromised patients (43%), and patients with a known history of tuberculosis (6%). The indications failed to comply with HAS recommendations in 42% of cases (151/360), i.e. 14% of all QFT-IT tests in 2009. Thirty-seven percent of request forms were related to suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. In the case of a positive QFT-IT test, the clinical decision-making was changed in 58% of cases when the indications met the HAS recommendations, compared with only 16% if they did not (p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the indications do not meet the health authority recommendations, the diagnostic value of the IGRA remains limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":21541,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"46 5","pages":"392-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.887221","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of interferon gamma release assays in clinical practice: review of QuantiFERON-TB prescription in a French university hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Magali Briere,&nbsp;Albert Sotto,&nbsp;Marie Audrain,&nbsp;David Boutoille,&nbsp;Virginie Nael,&nbsp;Claire Bernier,&nbsp;Frederique Naudin,&nbsp;Pascale Bemer\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/00365548.2014.887221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the clinical use of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) has increased exponentially, while their indications remain controversial given difficulties in interpretation. Four indications were recommended by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) in 2006. We evaluated the utilization of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) test over a 1-y period in a French university hospital and the impact of IGRA results in particular.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The QFT-IT tests requested in 2009 were analysed retrospectively, excluding those from the Occupational Health Department, the Regional Tuberculosis Centre, and rheumatology consultations for which the indications were clearly defined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred and sixty QFT-IT tests were analysed. The interpretation was frequently problematic given the inclusion of a significant proportion of patients over 80 y of age (11%), immunocompromised patients (43%), and patients with a known history of tuberculosis (6%). The indications failed to comply with HAS recommendations in 42% of cases (151/360), i.e. 14% of all QFT-IT tests in 2009. Thirty-seven percent of request forms were related to suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. In the case of a positive QFT-IT test, the clinical decision-making was changed in 58% of cases when the indications met the HAS recommendations, compared with only 16% if they did not (p < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When the indications do not meet the health authority recommendations, the diagnostic value of the IGRA remains limited.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"392-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/00365548.2014.887221\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.887221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/00365548.2014.887221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:近年来,临床使用干扰素γ释放法(IGRAs)呈指数增长,但由于解释困难,其适应症仍然存在争议。2006年,法国国家卫生管理局(HAS)推荐了四种适应症。我们评估了QuantiFERON-TB管内金(QFT-IT)测试在法国大学医院1年期间的使用情况,特别是IGRA结果的影响。方法:回顾性分析2009年要求的QFT-IT测试,不包括来自职业卫生部门、地区结核病中心和风湿病学咨询的适应症明确定义的测试。结果:对360例QFT-IT试验进行了分析。由于纳入了相当大比例的80岁以上患者(11%)、免疫功能低下患者(43%)和已知结核病史患者(6%),这种解释经常存在问题。42%的病例(151/360)的适应症不符合HAS的建议,即占2009年所有QFT-IT测试的14%。37%的申请表与疑似肺结核有关。在QFT-IT测试阳性的情况下,当适应症符合HAS建议时,58%的病例会改变临床决策,而如果不符合HAS建议,只有16%的病例会改变临床决策(p < 0.005)。结论:当适应症不符合卫生主管部门的建议时,IGRA的诊断价值仍然有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of interferon gamma release assays in clinical practice: review of QuantiFERON-TB prescription in a French university hospital.

Background: In recent years, the clinical use of interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) has increased exponentially, while their indications remain controversial given difficulties in interpretation. Four indications were recommended by the French National Authority for Health (HAS) in 2006. We evaluated the utilization of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-IT) test over a 1-y period in a French university hospital and the impact of IGRA results in particular.

Methods: The QFT-IT tests requested in 2009 were analysed retrospectively, excluding those from the Occupational Health Department, the Regional Tuberculosis Centre, and rheumatology consultations for which the indications were clearly defined.

Results: Three hundred and sixty QFT-IT tests were analysed. The interpretation was frequently problematic given the inclusion of a significant proportion of patients over 80 y of age (11%), immunocompromised patients (43%), and patients with a known history of tuberculosis (6%). The indications failed to comply with HAS recommendations in 42% of cases (151/360), i.e. 14% of all QFT-IT tests in 2009. Thirty-seven percent of request forms were related to suspected pulmonary tuberculosis. In the case of a positive QFT-IT test, the clinical decision-making was changed in 58% of cases when the indications met the HAS recommendations, compared with only 16% if they did not (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: When the indications do not meet the health authority recommendations, the diagnostic value of the IGRA remains limited.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信