拉丁美洲科学期刊是否遵循双重用途审查政策?

Edith Gladys Valles, Adriana Silvina Bernacchi
{"title":"拉丁美洲科学期刊是否遵循双重用途审查政策?","authors":"Edith Gladys Valles, Adriana Silvina Bernacchi","doi":"10.1089/bsp.2013.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the past decade, a number of journals have implemented dual-use policies in order to analyze whether the papers submitted for publication could raise concern because of the potential for misuse of their content. In this context, an analysis was performed on Latin American scientific journals to examine whether they apply formal written dual-use review policies and whether they inform their authors and reviewers about potentially sensitive issues in this area, as other international journals do. Peer-reviewed life sciences journals indexed in Latindex from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile were analyzed. The Guide for Authors and the Instructions to Referees of 216 journals included in the Latindex catalogue (which means that they meet the best quality standards of the Latindex system) were screened for biosecurity-related information using the keywords biosecurity, biological weapons, and dual-use research of concern. Results showed that the screened publications had a total lack of dual-use review policies, even though some of them pointed out ethical behaviors to be followed related to authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, research results misappropriation, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, guiding principles for the care and use of animals in research, research standard violations, and reviewer bias, among others. </p>","PeriodicalId":87059,"journal":{"name":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","volume":"12 2","pages":"94-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2013.0088","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Latin American scientific journals follow dual-use review policies?\",\"authors\":\"Edith Gladys Valles, Adriana Silvina Bernacchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/bsp.2013.0088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During the past decade, a number of journals have implemented dual-use policies in order to analyze whether the papers submitted for publication could raise concern because of the potential for misuse of their content. In this context, an analysis was performed on Latin American scientific journals to examine whether they apply formal written dual-use review policies and whether they inform their authors and reviewers about potentially sensitive issues in this area, as other international journals do. Peer-reviewed life sciences journals indexed in Latindex from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile were analyzed. The Guide for Authors and the Instructions to Referees of 216 journals included in the Latindex catalogue (which means that they meet the best quality standards of the Latindex system) were screened for biosecurity-related information using the keywords biosecurity, biological weapons, and dual-use research of concern. Results showed that the screened publications had a total lack of dual-use review policies, even though some of them pointed out ethical behaviors to be followed related to authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, research results misappropriation, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, guiding principles for the care and use of animals in research, research standard violations, and reviewer bias, among others. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"94-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bsp.2013.0088\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2013.0088\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosecurity and bioterrorism : biodefense strategy, practice, and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bsp.2013.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在过去十年中,一些期刊实施了双重用途政策,以便分析提交出版的论文是否会因其内容可能被滥用而引起关注。在这方面,对拉丁美洲科学期刊进行了一项分析,以审查它们是否采用正式的书面双重用途审查政策,以及它们是否像其他国际期刊那样,将这方面的潜在敏感问题通知其作者和审稿人。对来自巴西、墨西哥、阿根廷和智利的Latindex索引的同行评审生命科学期刊进行了分析。使用关键词“生物安全”、“生物武器”和“关注的双重用途研究”筛选纳入Latindex目录(这意味着它们符合Latindex系统的最佳质量标准)的216种期刊的《作者指南》和《审稿说明》,以获取与生物安全相关的信息。结果显示,被筛选的出版物完全缺乏双重用途审查政策,尽管其中一些出版物指出了与作者署名、抄袭、同时提交、研究成果盗用、涉及人体受试者的医学研究的伦理原则、研究中照顾和使用动物的指导原则、违反研究标准和审稿人偏见等相关的伦理行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Do Latin American scientific journals follow dual-use review policies?

Do Latin American scientific journals follow dual-use review policies?

During the past decade, a number of journals have implemented dual-use policies in order to analyze whether the papers submitted for publication could raise concern because of the potential for misuse of their content. In this context, an analysis was performed on Latin American scientific journals to examine whether they apply formal written dual-use review policies and whether they inform their authors and reviewers about potentially sensitive issues in this area, as other international journals do. Peer-reviewed life sciences journals indexed in Latindex from Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, and Chile were analyzed. The Guide for Authors and the Instructions to Referees of 216 journals included in the Latindex catalogue (which means that they meet the best quality standards of the Latindex system) were screened for biosecurity-related information using the keywords biosecurity, biological weapons, and dual-use research of concern. Results showed that the screened publications had a total lack of dual-use review policies, even though some of them pointed out ethical behaviors to be followed related to authorship, plagiarism, simultaneous submission, research results misappropriation, ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects, guiding principles for the care and use of animals in research, research standard violations, and reviewer bias, among others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信