机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗的经验和熟练程度之间的关系——来自PRECISE多中心研究的见解

Acute cardiac care Pub Date : 2014-06-01 Epub Date: 2014-03-21 DOI:10.3109/17482941.2014.889314
Giora Weisz, Nathaniel R Smilowitz, D Christopher Metzger, Ronald Caputo, Juan Delgado, J Jeffrey Marshall, George Vetrovec, Mark Reisman, Ron Waksman, Augusto Pichard, Juan F Granada, Jeffrey W Moses, Joseph P Carrozza
{"title":"机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗的经验和熟练程度之间的关系——来自PRECISE多中心研究的见解","authors":"Giora Weisz,&nbsp;Nathaniel R Smilowitz,&nbsp;D Christopher Metzger,&nbsp;Ronald Caputo,&nbsp;Juan Delgado,&nbsp;J Jeffrey Marshall,&nbsp;George Vetrovec,&nbsp;Mark Reisman,&nbsp;Ron Waksman,&nbsp;Augusto Pichard,&nbsp;Juan F Granada,&nbsp;Jeffrey W Moses,&nbsp;Joseph P Carrozza","doi":"10.3109/17482941.2014.889314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The PRECISE multi-center study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic-enhanced coronary intervention (PCI). We studied the learning curve associated with the robotic PCI approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CorPath 200 robotic system was used to perform clinically indicated PCI. The first 3 cases performed by each interventional cardiologist were considered early-experience cases and subsequent procedures were regarded as advanced-experience cases. We compared procedure efficiency, patient radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes in early and advanced-experience cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 robotic-enhanced PCI procedures were performed, with 60 early-experience cases. Advanced-experience cases were associated with shorter procedure duration (51.3 ± 25.5 min vs. 42.2 ± 16.4 min, P = 0.008) and fluoroscopy time (12.9 ± 7.8 min vs. 10.1 ± 4.8 min, 0.009) as compared to early-experience cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After performing 3 cases, interventionalists were able to complete robotic-enhanced PCI faster, with reduced radiation, and without compromising safety. The steep learning curve highlights the easy adoption of remote-control robotic technology for PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":87385,"journal":{"name":"Acute cardiac care","volume":"16 2","pages":"37-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2014.889314","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Giora Weisz,&nbsp;Nathaniel R Smilowitz,&nbsp;D Christopher Metzger,&nbsp;Ronald Caputo,&nbsp;Juan Delgado,&nbsp;J Jeffrey Marshall,&nbsp;George Vetrovec,&nbsp;Mark Reisman,&nbsp;Ron Waksman,&nbsp;Augusto Pichard,&nbsp;Juan F Granada,&nbsp;Jeffrey W Moses,&nbsp;Joseph P Carrozza\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/17482941.2014.889314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The PRECISE multi-center study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic-enhanced coronary intervention (PCI). We studied the learning curve associated with the robotic PCI approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The CorPath 200 robotic system was used to perform clinically indicated PCI. The first 3 cases performed by each interventional cardiologist were considered early-experience cases and subsequent procedures were regarded as advanced-experience cases. We compared procedure efficiency, patient radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes in early and advanced-experience cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 164 robotic-enhanced PCI procedures were performed, with 60 early-experience cases. Advanced-experience cases were associated with shorter procedure duration (51.3 ± 25.5 min vs. 42.2 ± 16.4 min, P = 0.008) and fluoroscopy time (12.9 ± 7.8 min vs. 10.1 ± 4.8 min, 0.009) as compared to early-experience cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After performing 3 cases, interventionalists were able to complete robotic-enhanced PCI faster, with reduced radiation, and without compromising safety. The steep learning curve highlights the easy adoption of remote-control robotic technology for PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"volume\":\"16 2\",\"pages\":\"37-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/17482941.2014.889314\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute cardiac care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2014.889314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute cardiac care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/17482941.2014.889314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

目的:PRECISE多中心研究证明了机器人增强冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的安全性和可行性。我们研究了与机器人PCI入路相关的学习曲线。方法:采用CorPath 200机器人系统进行临床指征PCI。每位介入心脏病专家前3例为早期经验病例,后续手术为高级经验病例。我们比较了早期和高级经验病例的手术效率、患者辐射暴露和临床结果。结果:共进行了164例机器人增强PCI手术,其中60例有早期经验。经验丰富的患者手术时间(51.3±25.5 min vs. 42.2±16.4 min, P = 0.008)和透视时间(12.9±7.8 min vs. 10.1±4.8 min, 0.009)短于经验丰富的患者。结论:在完成3例病例后,介入医师能够更快地完成机器人增强PCI,减少辐射,并且不影响安全性。陡峭的学习曲线突出了PCI远程控制机器人技术的容易采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The association between experience and proficiency with robotic-enhanced coronary intervention-insights from the PRECISE multi-center study.

Objectives: The PRECISE multi-center study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic-enhanced coronary intervention (PCI). We studied the learning curve associated with the robotic PCI approach.

Methods: The CorPath 200 robotic system was used to perform clinically indicated PCI. The first 3 cases performed by each interventional cardiologist were considered early-experience cases and subsequent procedures were regarded as advanced-experience cases. We compared procedure efficiency, patient radiation exposure, and clinical outcomes in early and advanced-experience cases.

Results: A total of 164 robotic-enhanced PCI procedures were performed, with 60 early-experience cases. Advanced-experience cases were associated with shorter procedure duration (51.3 ± 25.5 min vs. 42.2 ± 16.4 min, P = 0.008) and fluoroscopy time (12.9 ± 7.8 min vs. 10.1 ± 4.8 min, 0.009) as compared to early-experience cases.

Conclusions: After performing 3 cases, interventionalists were able to complete robotic-enhanced PCI faster, with reduced radiation, and without compromising safety. The steep learning curve highlights the easy adoption of remote-control robotic technology for PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信