将预脉冲间隙模式应用于人体的参数优化。

Korean journal of audiology Pub Date : 2013-12-01 Epub Date: 2013-12-13 DOI:10.7874/kja.2013.17.3.118
Myung-Whan Suh, Kun Woo Kim, Il-Yong Park, Seung-Ha Oh
{"title":"将预脉冲间隙模式应用于人体的参数优化。","authors":"Myung-Whan Suh,&nbsp;Kun Woo Kim,&nbsp;Il-Yong Park,&nbsp;Seung-Ha Oh","doi":"10.7874/kja.2013.17.3.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Turner and colleagues introduced a new method that can detect tinnitus in animals. The stimulus is composed of a small background noise that is identical to the pitch of the tinnitus and a large pulse noise that can evoke a startle response. In normal rats, the gap decreases the startle reflex. However, in tinnitus rats, the gap does not decrease the startle reflex. The goal of this study was to optimize the stimulation paradigm so that the prepulse inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude would be maximized in the normal human subjects.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Seven normal control subjects without tinnitus were recruited. The stimulus was composed of two different sounds: the softer background noise and the louder pulse noise. A 50 msec silent gap was inserted before the pulse noise as the gap condition (G condition) but not in the no-gap condition (N condition). The averaged amplitude of the N1-P2 cortical response was recorded for the G and N conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The G/N ratio was the smallest when the gap was 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. The G/N ratio was 84.8±16.8% with the Hanning window and 78.5±5.9% without the window. The G/N ratio was 91.1±24.9%, 78.0±5.4%, and 79.0±18.1% when the intensity of the background noise was 10, 20, and 32 dB SL, respectively. When the intensity of the background noise was 20 and 32 dB SL, the N1-P2 amplitude of the G condition was significantly smaller than that of the N condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal stimulus should be composed of the 1 kHz pulse noise without Hanning window. The intensity of the background noise should be 20 dB HL and the location of the gap should be 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. It seems that with these optimized parameters we could expect a 78.0% inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude in normal subjects without tinnitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":90252,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of audiology","volume":"17 3","pages":"118-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/fd/kja-17-118.PMC3936552.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parameter optimization for applying the prepulse gap paradigm to humans.\",\"authors\":\"Myung-Whan Suh,&nbsp;Kun Woo Kim,&nbsp;Il-Yong Park,&nbsp;Seung-Ha Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/kja.2013.17.3.118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Turner and colleagues introduced a new method that can detect tinnitus in animals. The stimulus is composed of a small background noise that is identical to the pitch of the tinnitus and a large pulse noise that can evoke a startle response. In normal rats, the gap decreases the startle reflex. However, in tinnitus rats, the gap does not decrease the startle reflex. The goal of this study was to optimize the stimulation paradigm so that the prepulse inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude would be maximized in the normal human subjects.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Seven normal control subjects without tinnitus were recruited. The stimulus was composed of two different sounds: the softer background noise and the louder pulse noise. A 50 msec silent gap was inserted before the pulse noise as the gap condition (G condition) but not in the no-gap condition (N condition). The averaged amplitude of the N1-P2 cortical response was recorded for the G and N conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The G/N ratio was the smallest when the gap was 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. The G/N ratio was 84.8±16.8% with the Hanning window and 78.5±5.9% without the window. The G/N ratio was 91.1±24.9%, 78.0±5.4%, and 79.0±18.1% when the intensity of the background noise was 10, 20, and 32 dB SL, respectively. When the intensity of the background noise was 20 and 32 dB SL, the N1-P2 amplitude of the G condition was significantly smaller than that of the N condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimal stimulus should be composed of the 1 kHz pulse noise without Hanning window. The intensity of the background noise should be 20 dB HL and the location of the gap should be 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. It seems that with these optimized parameters we could expect a 78.0% inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude in normal subjects without tinnitus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of audiology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"118-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/fd/kja-17-118.PMC3936552.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2013.17.3.118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/12/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2013.17.3.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/12/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目的:Turner及其同事介绍了一种可以检测动物耳鸣的新方法。刺激是由与耳鸣的音高相同的小背景噪音和可以引起惊吓反应的大脉冲噪音组成的。在正常大鼠中,这个间隙会减少惊吓反射。然而,在耳鸣的大鼠中,间隙并没有减少惊吓反射。本研究的目的是优化刺激模式,使正常人的脉冲前N1-P2振幅抑制达到最大。对象与方法:招募无耳鸣的正常对照者7名。刺激由两种不同的声音组成:较软的背景噪音和较大的脉冲噪音。作为间隙条件(G条件),在脉冲噪声前插入一个50 msec的无声间隙,而不是在无间隙条件(N条件)。记录G和N条件下N1-P2皮质反应的平均振幅。结果:脉冲噪声前间隙为20 msec时,G/N比最小。有汉宁窗时G/N为84.8±16.8%,无汉宁窗时为78.5±5.9%。背景噪声强度为10、20和32 dB SL时,G/N比分别为91.1±24.9%、78.0±5.4%和79.0±18.1%。当背景噪声强度分别为20和32 dB SL时,G条件的N1-P2幅值明显小于N条件。结论:最优刺激为无汉宁窗的1 kHz脉冲噪声。背景噪声的强度应为20db HL,间隙位置应比脉冲噪声早20msec。在这些优化的参数下,我们可以预期在没有耳鸣的正常受试者中N1-P2振幅的抑制率为78.0%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parameter optimization for applying the prepulse gap paradigm to humans.

Parameter optimization for applying the prepulse gap paradigm to humans.

Parameter optimization for applying the prepulse gap paradigm to humans.

Parameter optimization for applying the prepulse gap paradigm to humans.

Background and objectives: Turner and colleagues introduced a new method that can detect tinnitus in animals. The stimulus is composed of a small background noise that is identical to the pitch of the tinnitus and a large pulse noise that can evoke a startle response. In normal rats, the gap decreases the startle reflex. However, in tinnitus rats, the gap does not decrease the startle reflex. The goal of this study was to optimize the stimulation paradigm so that the prepulse inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude would be maximized in the normal human subjects.

Subjects and methods: Seven normal control subjects without tinnitus were recruited. The stimulus was composed of two different sounds: the softer background noise and the louder pulse noise. A 50 msec silent gap was inserted before the pulse noise as the gap condition (G condition) but not in the no-gap condition (N condition). The averaged amplitude of the N1-P2 cortical response was recorded for the G and N conditions.

Results: The G/N ratio was the smallest when the gap was 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. The G/N ratio was 84.8±16.8% with the Hanning window and 78.5±5.9% without the window. The G/N ratio was 91.1±24.9%, 78.0±5.4%, and 79.0±18.1% when the intensity of the background noise was 10, 20, and 32 dB SL, respectively. When the intensity of the background noise was 20 and 32 dB SL, the N1-P2 amplitude of the G condition was significantly smaller than that of the N condition.

Conclusions: The optimal stimulus should be composed of the 1 kHz pulse noise without Hanning window. The intensity of the background noise should be 20 dB HL and the location of the gap should be 20 msec prior to the pulse noise. It seems that with these optimized parameters we could expect a 78.0% inhibition of N1-P2 amplitude in normal subjects without tinnitus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信