电刺激率对人工耳蜗使用者语音识别的影响。

Korean journal of audiology Pub Date : 2012-04-01 Epub Date: 2012-04-30 DOI:10.7874/kja.2012.16.1.6
Sung Hye Park, Eunoak Kim, Hyo-Jeong Lee, Hyung-Jong Kim
{"title":"电刺激率对人工耳蜗使用者语音识别的影响。","authors":"Sung Hye Park,&nbsp;Eunoak Kim,&nbsp;Hyo-Jeong Lee,&nbsp;Hyung-Jong Kim","doi":"10.7874/kja.2012.16.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The stimulus signals delivered in cochlear implant (CI) systems are generally derived by sampling the temporal envelope of each channel at some constant rate and using its intensity to control the stimulation current level delivered to the corresponding electrode site. The objective of the study was to investigate speech recognition performance of cochlear implant users in quiet and noisy environments using either moderate or high rates of electrical stimulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six post-lingually deafened adult users of the Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant (Contour® electrode array, Cochlear™, Macquarie Park, Australia) with the Freedom® speech processor participated in the study. Stimulation rates of 900 and 2400 pulses-per-second/channel (pps/ch) were used after both stimulation programs were balanced for loudness. Monosyllabic word and sentence recognition scores in quiet and noisy environments were evaluated for each stimulation program after two months of practice. Subjects were also asked to respond to a questionnaire to examine their preference to any stimulation rate in different hearing conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet conditions with the 900 stimulation rate was better than that of the 2400 stimulation rate, although no significant differences between them were found for sentence test in noise. A survey questionnaire indicated that most subjects preferred the 900 stimulation rate to the 2400 stimulation rate, especially in quiet conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most subjects indicated a preference for 900 pps/ch rate in quiet conditions. It is recommended to remap at 900 pps/ch for those CI users whose performance in quiet conditions is less than ideal.</p>","PeriodicalId":90252,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of audiology","volume":"16 1","pages":"6-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/68/kja-16-6.PMC3936531.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.\",\"authors\":\"Sung Hye Park,&nbsp;Eunoak Kim,&nbsp;Hyo-Jeong Lee,&nbsp;Hyung-Jong Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.7874/kja.2012.16.1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The stimulus signals delivered in cochlear implant (CI) systems are generally derived by sampling the temporal envelope of each channel at some constant rate and using its intensity to control the stimulation current level delivered to the corresponding electrode site. The objective of the study was to investigate speech recognition performance of cochlear implant users in quiet and noisy environments using either moderate or high rates of electrical stimulations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six post-lingually deafened adult users of the Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant (Contour® electrode array, Cochlear™, Macquarie Park, Australia) with the Freedom® speech processor participated in the study. Stimulation rates of 900 and 2400 pulses-per-second/channel (pps/ch) were used after both stimulation programs were balanced for loudness. Monosyllabic word and sentence recognition scores in quiet and noisy environments were evaluated for each stimulation program after two months of practice. Subjects were also asked to respond to a questionnaire to examine their preference to any stimulation rate in different hearing conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet conditions with the 900 stimulation rate was better than that of the 2400 stimulation rate, although no significant differences between them were found for sentence test in noise. A survey questionnaire indicated that most subjects preferred the 900 stimulation rate to the 2400 stimulation rate, especially in quiet conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most subjects indicated a preference for 900 pps/ch rate in quiet conditions. It is recommended to remap at 900 pps/ch for those CI users whose performance in quiet conditions is less than ideal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean journal of audiology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"6-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/23/68/kja-16-6.PMC3936531.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean journal of audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2012.16.1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of audiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2012.16.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景和目的:人工耳蜗(CI)系统中传递的刺激信号通常是通过以一定的恒定速率采样每个通道的时间包络来获得的,并利用其强度来控制传递到相应电极部位的刺激电流水平。本研究的目的是研究人工耳蜗使用者在安静和嘈杂的环境中使用中等或高强度电刺激的语音识别性能。材料和方法:6名使用配有Freedom®语音处理器的Nucleus CI24人工耳蜗(Contour®电极阵列,cochlear™,Macquarie Park,澳大利亚)的语后失聪成人使用者参与了研究。在两种刺激方案对响度进行平衡后,使用900和2400脉冲每秒/通道(pps/ch)的刺激速率。经过两个月的练习,在安静和嘈杂的环境中评估每个刺激方案的单音节单词和句子识别分数。受试者还被要求回答一份问卷,以检查他们在不同听力条件下对任何刺激率的偏好。结果:安静条件下900刺激下的单音节单词识别成绩优于2400刺激下的单音节单词识别成绩,而噪声条件下句子测试的单音节单词识别成绩无显著差异。问卷调查显示,大多数被试在安静条件下更喜欢900刺激速率而不是2400刺激速率。结论:大多数受试者在安静条件下偏好900 pps/ch的速度。对于那些在安静条件下性能不太理想的CI用户,建议将其重新映射为900 pps/ch。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Effects of electrical stimulation rate on speech recognition in cochlear implant users.

Background and objectives: The stimulus signals delivered in cochlear implant (CI) systems are generally derived by sampling the temporal envelope of each channel at some constant rate and using its intensity to control the stimulation current level delivered to the corresponding electrode site. The objective of the study was to investigate speech recognition performance of cochlear implant users in quiet and noisy environments using either moderate or high rates of electrical stimulations.

Materials and methods: Six post-lingually deafened adult users of the Nucleus CI24 cochlear implant (Contour® electrode array, Cochlear™, Macquarie Park, Australia) with the Freedom® speech processor participated in the study. Stimulation rates of 900 and 2400 pulses-per-second/channel (pps/ch) were used after both stimulation programs were balanced for loudness. Monosyllabic word and sentence recognition scores in quiet and noisy environments were evaluated for each stimulation program after two months of practice. Subjects were also asked to respond to a questionnaire to examine their preference to any stimulation rate in different hearing conditions.

Results: Word recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet conditions with the 900 stimulation rate was better than that of the 2400 stimulation rate, although no significant differences between them were found for sentence test in noise. A survey questionnaire indicated that most subjects preferred the 900 stimulation rate to the 2400 stimulation rate, especially in quiet conditions.

Conclusions: Most subjects indicated a preference for 900 pps/ch rate in quiet conditions. It is recommended to remap at 900 pps/ch for those CI users whose performance in quiet conditions is less than ideal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信