{"title":"使用无滤光片的平坦光子束治疗成神经管细胞瘤:剂量学评价。","authors":"Pichandi Anchineyan, Ganesh K Mani, Jerrin Amalraj, Balaji Karthik, Surega Anbumani","doi":"10.1155/2014/769698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim. To evaluate the dosimetric benefits of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and Rapid Arc (RA) over conventional CSI methods. Methods and Materials. Five patients treated with IMRT using static multileaf collimators (MLC) were randomly selected for this retrospective study. Dynamic MLC IMRT, RA, and conformal therapy (3DCRT) were iterated with the same CT data sets with and without flattening filter photons. Total dose prescribed was 28.80 Gy in 16 fractions. Dosimetric parameters such as D max, D min, D mean, V 95%, V 107%, DHI, and CI for PTV and D max, D mean, V 80%, V 50%, V 30%, and V 10% for OARs were extracted from DVHs. Beam on time (BOT) for various plans was also compared. Results. FFF RA therapy (6F_RA) resulted in highly homogeneous and conformal doses throughout the craniospinal axis. 3DCRT resulted in the highest V 107% (SD) 46.97 ± 28.6, whereas flattening filter (FF) and FFF dynamic IMRT had a minimum V 107%. 6F_RA and 6F_DMLC resulted in lesser doses to thyroid, eyes, esophagus, liver, lungs, and kidneys. Conclusion. FFF IMRT and FFF RA for CSI have definite dosimetric advantages over 3DCRT technique in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing. Use of FFF in IMRT resulted in 50% reduction in BOT, thereby increasing the treatment efficiency. </p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":"2014 ","pages":"769698"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/769698","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of flattening filter-free photon beams in treating medulloblastoma: a dosimetric evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Pichandi Anchineyan, Ganesh K Mani, Jerrin Amalraj, Balaji Karthik, Surega Anbumani\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2014/769698\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aim. To evaluate the dosimetric benefits of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and Rapid Arc (RA) over conventional CSI methods. Methods and Materials. Five patients treated with IMRT using static multileaf collimators (MLC) were randomly selected for this retrospective study. Dynamic MLC IMRT, RA, and conformal therapy (3DCRT) were iterated with the same CT data sets with and without flattening filter photons. Total dose prescribed was 28.80 Gy in 16 fractions. Dosimetric parameters such as D max, D min, D mean, V 95%, V 107%, DHI, and CI for PTV and D max, D mean, V 80%, V 50%, V 30%, and V 10% for OARs were extracted from DVHs. Beam on time (BOT) for various plans was also compared. Results. FFF RA therapy (6F_RA) resulted in highly homogeneous and conformal doses throughout the craniospinal axis. 3DCRT resulted in the highest V 107% (SD) 46.97 ± 28.6, whereas flattening filter (FF) and FFF dynamic IMRT had a minimum V 107%. 6F_RA and 6F_DMLC resulted in lesser doses to thyroid, eyes, esophagus, liver, lungs, and kidneys. Conclusion. FFF IMRT and FFF RA for CSI have definite dosimetric advantages over 3DCRT technique in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing. Use of FFF in IMRT resulted in 50% reduction in BOT, thereby increasing the treatment efficiency. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"volume\":\"2014 \",\"pages\":\"769698\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2014/769698\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/769698\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/769698","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
的目标。评估在调强放射治疗(IMRT)和快速电弧治疗(RA)中,无滤波(FFF)光子束平坦化在剂量学上的优势。方法与材料。随机选择5例使用静态多叶准直器(MLC)进行IMRT治疗的患者进行回顾性研究。动态MLC IMRT, RA和适形治疗(3DCRT)使用相同的CT数据集进行迭代,有或没有平坦滤波光子。总剂量为28.80 Gy,分为16份。从DVHs中提取剂量学参数,如PTV的D max, D min, D mean, v95%, v107%, DHI和CI,以及OARs的D max, D mean, v80%, v50%, v30%和v10%。并比较了不同方案的光束准点率。结果。FFF RA治疗(6F_RA)在整个颅脊髓轴产生高度均匀和适形的剂量。3DCRT的v107%最高(SD 46.97±28.6),而平坦滤波(FF)和FFF动态IMRT的v107%最低。6F_RA和6F_DMLC对甲状腺、眼睛、食道、肝脏、肺和肾脏的剂量较小。结论。FFF IMRT和FFF RA在靶覆盖和OAR节约方面比3DCRT技术具有明显的剂量学优势。在IMRT中使用FFF导致BOT减少50%,从而提高了治疗效率。
Use of flattening filter-free photon beams in treating medulloblastoma: a dosimetric evaluation.
Aim. To evaluate the dosimetric benefits of flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and Rapid Arc (RA) over conventional CSI methods. Methods and Materials. Five patients treated with IMRT using static multileaf collimators (MLC) were randomly selected for this retrospective study. Dynamic MLC IMRT, RA, and conformal therapy (3DCRT) were iterated with the same CT data sets with and without flattening filter photons. Total dose prescribed was 28.80 Gy in 16 fractions. Dosimetric parameters such as D max, D min, D mean, V 95%, V 107%, DHI, and CI for PTV and D max, D mean, V 80%, V 50%, V 30%, and V 10% for OARs were extracted from DVHs. Beam on time (BOT) for various plans was also compared. Results. FFF RA therapy (6F_RA) resulted in highly homogeneous and conformal doses throughout the craniospinal axis. 3DCRT resulted in the highest V 107% (SD) 46.97 ± 28.6, whereas flattening filter (FF) and FFF dynamic IMRT had a minimum V 107%. 6F_RA and 6F_DMLC resulted in lesser doses to thyroid, eyes, esophagus, liver, lungs, and kidneys. Conclusion. FFF IMRT and FFF RA for CSI have definite dosimetric advantages over 3DCRT technique in terms of target coverage and OAR sparing. Use of FFF in IMRT resulted in 50% reduction in BOT, thereby increasing the treatment efficiency.