Yao Zhu, Wei-Jie Gu, Ding-Wei Ye, Xu-Dong Yao, Shi-Lin Zhang, Bo Dai, Hai-Liang Zhang, Yi-Jun Shen
{"title":"外部验证的形态图预测癌症特异性死亡率的阴茎癌患者接受最终手术。","authors":"Yao Zhu, Wei-Jie Gu, Ding-Wei Ye, Xu-Dong Yao, Shi-Lin Zhang, Bo Dai, Hai-Liang Zhang, Yi-Jun Shen","doi":"10.5732/cjc.013.10176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a population-based cancer registry, Thuret et al. developed 3 nomograms for estimating cancer-specific mortality in men with penile squamous cell carcinoma. In the initial cohort, only 23.0% of the patients were treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy and had pN stage. To generalize the prediction models in clinical practice, we evaluated the performance of the 3 nomograms in a series of penile cancer patients who were treated with definitive surgery. Clinicopathologic information was obtained from 160 M0 penile cancer patients who underwent primary tumor excision and regional lymphadenectomy between 1990 and 2008. The predicted probabilities of cancer-specific mortality were calculated from 3 nomograms that were based on different disease stage definitions and tumor grade. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were assessed to compare model performance. The discrimination ability was similar in nomograms using the TNM classification or American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.817 and 0.832, respectively), whereas it was inferior for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.728). Better agreement with the observed cancer-specific mortality was shown for the model consisting of TNM classification and tumor grade, which also achieved favorable clinical net benefit, with a threshold probability in the range of 0 to 42%. The nomogram consisting of TNM classification and tumor grading was shown to have better performance for predicting cancer-specific mortality in penile cancer patients who underwent definitive surgery. Our data support the integration of this model in decision-making and trial design. </p>","PeriodicalId":10034,"journal":{"name":"癌症","volume":"33 5","pages":"249-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/e4/cjc-33-05-249.PMC4026545.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of nomograms for predicting cancer-specific mortality in penile cancer patients treated with definitive surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Zhu, Wei-Jie Gu, Ding-Wei Ye, Xu-Dong Yao, Shi-Lin Zhang, Bo Dai, Hai-Liang Zhang, Yi-Jun Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.5732/cjc.013.10176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using a population-based cancer registry, Thuret et al. developed 3 nomograms for estimating cancer-specific mortality in men with penile squamous cell carcinoma. In the initial cohort, only 23.0% of the patients were treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy and had pN stage. To generalize the prediction models in clinical practice, we evaluated the performance of the 3 nomograms in a series of penile cancer patients who were treated with definitive surgery. Clinicopathologic information was obtained from 160 M0 penile cancer patients who underwent primary tumor excision and regional lymphadenectomy between 1990 and 2008. The predicted probabilities of cancer-specific mortality were calculated from 3 nomograms that were based on different disease stage definitions and tumor grade. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were assessed to compare model performance. The discrimination ability was similar in nomograms using the TNM classification or American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.817 and 0.832, respectively), whereas it was inferior for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.728). Better agreement with the observed cancer-specific mortality was shown for the model consisting of TNM classification and tumor grade, which also achieved favorable clinical net benefit, with a threshold probability in the range of 0 to 42%. The nomogram consisting of TNM classification and tumor grading was shown to have better performance for predicting cancer-specific mortality in penile cancer patients who underwent definitive surgery. Our data support the integration of this model in decision-making and trial design. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"癌症\",\"volume\":\"33 5\",\"pages\":\"249-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/aa/e4/cjc-33-05-249.PMC4026545.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"癌症\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.013.10176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"癌症","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.013.10176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
通过基于人群的癌症登记,Thuret等人开发了3种形态图,用于估计男性阴茎鳞状细胞癌的癌症特异性死亡率。在最初的队列中,只有23.0%的患者接受了腹股沟淋巴结切除术并出现了pN期。为了在临床实践中推广预测模型,我们评估了三种形态图在一系列接受明确手术治疗的阴茎癌患者中的表现。我们收集了1990 - 2008年间160万例阴茎癌患者的临床病理资料,这些患者接受了原发肿瘤切除术和局部淋巴结切除术。癌症特异性死亡率的预测概率是根据3个基于不同疾病分期定义和肿瘤分级的图来计算的。评估区分、校准和临床有用性以比较模型性能。使用TNM分类或美国癌症分期联合委员会(American Joint Committee on Cancer分期)的nomogram鉴别能力相似(Harrell’s concordance index分别为0.817和0.832),而监测、流行病学和最终结果分期的鉴别能力较差(Harrell’s concordance index = 0.728)。由TNM分类和肿瘤分级组成的模型与观察到的癌症特异性死亡率更吻合,也获得了良好的临床净效益,阈值概率在0 - 42%之间。由TNM分类和肿瘤分级组成的nomogram (nomogram)在预测接受最终手术的阴茎癌患者的癌症特异性死亡率方面表现更好。我们的数据支持将该模型集成到决策和试验设计中。
External validation of nomograms for predicting cancer-specific mortality in penile cancer patients treated with definitive surgery.
Using a population-based cancer registry, Thuret et al. developed 3 nomograms for estimating cancer-specific mortality in men with penile squamous cell carcinoma. In the initial cohort, only 23.0% of the patients were treated with inguinal lymphadenectomy and had pN stage. To generalize the prediction models in clinical practice, we evaluated the performance of the 3 nomograms in a series of penile cancer patients who were treated with definitive surgery. Clinicopathologic information was obtained from 160 M0 penile cancer patients who underwent primary tumor excision and regional lymphadenectomy between 1990 and 2008. The predicted probabilities of cancer-specific mortality were calculated from 3 nomograms that were based on different disease stage definitions and tumor grade. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were assessed to compare model performance. The discrimination ability was similar in nomograms using the TNM classification or American Joint Committee on Cancer staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.817 and 0.832, respectively), whereas it was inferior for the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results staging (Harrell's concordance index = 0.728). Better agreement with the observed cancer-specific mortality was shown for the model consisting of TNM classification and tumor grade, which also achieved favorable clinical net benefit, with a threshold probability in the range of 0 to 42%. The nomogram consisting of TNM classification and tumor grading was shown to have better performance for predicting cancer-specific mortality in penile cancer patients who underwent definitive surgery. Our data support the integration of this model in decision-making and trial design.
期刊介绍:
In July 2008, Landes Bioscience and Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center began co-publishing the international, English-language version of AI ZHENG or the Chinese Journal of Cancer (CJC). CJC publishes original research, reviews, extra views, perspectives, supplements, and spotlights in all areas of cancer research. The primary criteria for publication in CJC are originality, outstanding scientific merit, and general interest. The Editorial Board is composed of members from around the world, who will strive to maintain the highest standards for excellence in order to generate a valuable resource for an international readership.