畸形足的遗传性:一项双胞胎研究。

Journal of Children's Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2014-02-01 Epub Date: 2014-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7
Vilhelm Engell, Jan Nielsen, Frank Damborg, Kirsten Ohm Kyvik, Karsten Thomsen, Niels Wisbech Pedersen, Mikkel Andersen, Søren Overgaard
{"title":"畸形足的遗传性:一项双胞胎研究。","authors":"Vilhelm Engell,&nbsp;Jan Nielsen,&nbsp;Frank Damborg,&nbsp;Kirsten Ohm Kyvik,&nbsp;Karsten Thomsen,&nbsp;Niels Wisbech Pedersen,&nbsp;Mikkel Andersen,&nbsp;Søren Overgaard","doi":"10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aetiology of congenital clubfoot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families, and twins suggest a genetic component to the aetiology, other studies have identified environmental factors. The purpose of this study was to calculate heritability in order to determine to what extent genetic and/or environmental factors contribute to the aetiology of congenital clubfoot and to asses whether there was a change in the prevalence over time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Odense based Danish Twin Registry is unique as it contains data on all the approximately 85,000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 140 years. All 46,418 twin individuals born from 1931 through 1982, who had earlier consented to contact, received a 17-page Omnibus questionnaire in the spring of 2002. Data were analysed with structural equation models to identify the best fitting aetiological model based on a balance of goodness-of-fit and parsimony and to estimate heritability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital clubfoot of 0.0027 (95 % confidence interval 0.0022-0.0034). Fifty-five complete (both twins answered the question) twin pairs were identified representing 12 monozygotic, 22 same-sex dizygotic, 18 opposite-sex dizygotic, and 3 with unclassified zygosity. The model with only environmental factors (CE) was best fitting based on AIC, and the model with an additive genetic factor (ACE) came in second. Due to the small statistical power, we hypothesise that the model with both genetic and environmental effects (ACE) was the better model. Choosing the ACE-model we found a heritability of clubfoot of 30 %. Regression coefficient for age was -0.002 (-0.011 to 0.005), indicating that there has been no change in prevalence of clubfoot over the 50-year age span we examined.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We conclude that non-genetic factors must play a role, and a genetic factor might contribute, in the aetiology of congenital clubfoot.</p>","PeriodicalId":138259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","volume":" ","pages":"37-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heritability of clubfoot: a twin study.\",\"authors\":\"Vilhelm Engell,&nbsp;Jan Nielsen,&nbsp;Frank Damborg,&nbsp;Kirsten Ohm Kyvik,&nbsp;Karsten Thomsen,&nbsp;Niels Wisbech Pedersen,&nbsp;Mikkel Andersen,&nbsp;Søren Overgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aetiology of congenital clubfoot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families, and twins suggest a genetic component to the aetiology, other studies have identified environmental factors. The purpose of this study was to calculate heritability in order to determine to what extent genetic and/or environmental factors contribute to the aetiology of congenital clubfoot and to asses whether there was a change in the prevalence over time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Odense based Danish Twin Registry is unique as it contains data on all the approximately 85,000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 140 years. All 46,418 twin individuals born from 1931 through 1982, who had earlier consented to contact, received a 17-page Omnibus questionnaire in the spring of 2002. Data were analysed with structural equation models to identify the best fitting aetiological model based on a balance of goodness-of-fit and parsimony and to estimate heritability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital clubfoot of 0.0027 (95 % confidence interval 0.0022-0.0034). Fifty-five complete (both twins answered the question) twin pairs were identified representing 12 monozygotic, 22 same-sex dizygotic, 18 opposite-sex dizygotic, and 3 with unclassified zygosity. The model with only environmental factors (CE) was best fitting based on AIC, and the model with an additive genetic factor (ACE) came in second. Due to the small statistical power, we hypothesise that the model with both genetic and environmental effects (ACE) was the better model. Choosing the ACE-model we found a heritability of clubfoot of 30 %. Regression coefficient for age was -0.002 (-0.011 to 0.005), indicating that there has been no change in prevalence of clubfoot over the 50-year age span we examined.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We conclude that non-genetic factors must play a role, and a genetic factor might contribute, in the aetiology of congenital clubfoot.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"37-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2014/2/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Children's Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-014-0562-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/2/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

简介:先天性内翻足的病因尚不清楚。虽然对人群、家庭和双胞胎的研究表明遗传因素是病因,但其他研究已经确定了环境因素。本研究的目的是计算遗传力,以确定遗传和/或环境因素在多大程度上影响先天性内翻足的病因,并评估患病率是否随着时间的推移而变化。材料和方法:位于欧登塞的丹麦双胞胎登记处是独一无二的,因为它包含了过去140年来在丹麦出生的大约85,000对双胞胎的数据。所有出生于1931年至1982年的46,418对双胞胎在2002年春天收到了一份17页的综合调查问卷。用结构方程模型对数据进行分析,以确定基于拟合优度和简约性平衡的最佳拟合病原学模型,并估计遗传力。结果:我们发现先天性内翻足的总体自我报告患病率为0.0027(95%可信区间为0.0022-0.0034)。55对完整的双胞胎(双胞胎都回答了这个问题)被确定为12对同卵双胞胎,22对同性异卵双胞胎,18对异性异卵双胞胎和3对未分类的合子双胞胎。在AIC模型中,仅环境因子(CE)的拟合效果最好,加性遗传因子(ACE)的拟合效果次之。由于统计功率较小,我们假设同时具有遗传和环境效应的模型(ACE)是较好的模型。选择ace模型,我们发现内翻足的遗传率为30%。年龄的回归系数为-0.002(-0.011至0.005),表明在我们调查的50年年龄范围内,内翻足的患病率没有变化。讨论:我们得出结论,非遗传因素必须发挥作用,遗传因素可能有助于先天性内翻足的病因学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heritability of clubfoot: a twin study.

Introduction: The aetiology of congenital clubfoot is unclear. Although studies on populations, families, and twins suggest a genetic component to the aetiology, other studies have identified environmental factors. The purpose of this study was to calculate heritability in order to determine to what extent genetic and/or environmental factors contribute to the aetiology of congenital clubfoot and to asses whether there was a change in the prevalence over time.

Materials and methods: The Odense based Danish Twin Registry is unique as it contains data on all the approximately 85,000 twin pairs born in Denmark over the last 140 years. All 46,418 twin individuals born from 1931 through 1982, who had earlier consented to contact, received a 17-page Omnibus questionnaire in the spring of 2002. Data were analysed with structural equation models to identify the best fitting aetiological model based on a balance of goodness-of-fit and parsimony and to estimate heritability.

Results: We found an overall self-reported prevalence of congenital clubfoot of 0.0027 (95 % confidence interval 0.0022-0.0034). Fifty-five complete (both twins answered the question) twin pairs were identified representing 12 monozygotic, 22 same-sex dizygotic, 18 opposite-sex dizygotic, and 3 with unclassified zygosity. The model with only environmental factors (CE) was best fitting based on AIC, and the model with an additive genetic factor (ACE) came in second. Due to the small statistical power, we hypothesise that the model with both genetic and environmental effects (ACE) was the better model. Choosing the ACE-model we found a heritability of clubfoot of 30 %. Regression coefficient for age was -0.002 (-0.011 to 0.005), indicating that there has been no change in prevalence of clubfoot over the 50-year age span we examined.

Discussion: We conclude that non-genetic factors must play a role, and a genetic factor might contribute, in the aetiology of congenital clubfoot.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信