黄金时段的公共外交:探索娱乐教育在国际公共外交中的潜力。

American journal of media psychology Pub Date : 2012-01-01
Sheila T Murphy, Heather J Hether, Laurel J Felt, Sandra de Castro Buffington
{"title":"黄金时段的公共外交:探索娱乐教育在国际公共外交中的潜力。","authors":"Sheila T Murphy,&nbsp;Heather J Hether,&nbsp;Laurel J Felt,&nbsp;Sandra de Castro Buffington","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Can stories succeed where traditional forms of diplomacy have faltered? This study examined whether a primetime drama could impact American viewers' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to U.S. foreign policy and funding by surveying 173 viewers of an episode of Law & Order: SVU (\"Witness\"). Additionally, this study sought to uncover which theoretical construct - involvement with a specific character or involvement with the narrative more generally (transportation) - best predicted impact. The fictional character in question was Nardelie, a woman forced to flee the Democratic Republic of the Congo after repeated rape by militias vying for \"conflict minerals,\" so named because control of these valuable minerals has triggered numerous conflicts. Separate regression analyses suggested a positive relationship between impact of the storyline and both theoretical constructs. However, when both constructs were entered into a single regression, involvement with Nardelie was the stronger predictor of knowledge (e.g., conflict minerals, sexual violence, and asylum issues) and current or future behavior (i.e., discussing global health) while transportation was the stronger predictor of attitudes (i.e., support for aid). This suggests that, while correlated, these constructs do not completely overlap. Implications of these results and the use of entertainment education in public diplomacy are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":89885,"journal":{"name":"American journal of media psychology","volume":"5 1-4","pages":"5-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907116/pdf/nihms493376.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Diplomacy in Prime Time: Exploring the Potential of Entertainment Education in International Public Diplomacy.\",\"authors\":\"Sheila T Murphy,&nbsp;Heather J Hether,&nbsp;Laurel J Felt,&nbsp;Sandra de Castro Buffington\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Can stories succeed where traditional forms of diplomacy have faltered? This study examined whether a primetime drama could impact American viewers' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to U.S. foreign policy and funding by surveying 173 viewers of an episode of Law & Order: SVU (\\\"Witness\\\"). Additionally, this study sought to uncover which theoretical construct - involvement with a specific character or involvement with the narrative more generally (transportation) - best predicted impact. The fictional character in question was Nardelie, a woman forced to flee the Democratic Republic of the Congo after repeated rape by militias vying for \\\"conflict minerals,\\\" so named because control of these valuable minerals has triggered numerous conflicts. Separate regression analyses suggested a positive relationship between impact of the storyline and both theoretical constructs. However, when both constructs were entered into a single regression, involvement with Nardelie was the stronger predictor of knowledge (e.g., conflict minerals, sexual violence, and asylum issues) and current or future behavior (i.e., discussing global health) while transportation was the stronger predictor of attitudes (i.e., support for aid). This suggests that, while correlated, these constructs do not completely overlap. Implications of these results and the use of entertainment education in public diplomacy are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of media psychology\",\"volume\":\"5 1-4\",\"pages\":\"5-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907116/pdf/nihms493376.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of media psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of media psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

故事能在传统外交方式失败的地方取得成功吗?这项研究通过调查173名观看了《法律与秩序:SVU》(《证人》)一集的观众,来检验一部黄金时段的电视剧是否会影响美国观众对美国外交政策和资金的认识、态度和行为。此外,本研究试图揭示哪一种理论结构——与特定角色的关系或与更普遍的叙事(交通)的关系——最能预测影响。这个虚构的人物名叫纳德利,是一名被迫逃离刚果民主共和国的妇女,她被争夺“冲突矿产”的民兵多次强奸,因为对这些宝贵矿产的控制引发了无数冲突。单独的回归分析表明,故事情节的影响与两种理论结构之间存在正相关关系。然而,当这两个构式进入单一回归时,参与Nardelie是知识(例如,冲突矿物,性暴力和庇护问题)和当前或未来行为(例如,讨论全球健康)的更强预测因子,而交通是态度(例如,支持援助)的更强预测因子。这表明,虽然相关,但这些结构并不完全重叠。讨论了这些结果的含义以及娱乐教育在公共外交中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Diplomacy in Prime Time: Exploring the Potential of Entertainment Education in International Public Diplomacy.

Can stories succeed where traditional forms of diplomacy have faltered? This study examined whether a primetime drama could impact American viewers' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior with respect to U.S. foreign policy and funding by surveying 173 viewers of an episode of Law & Order: SVU ("Witness"). Additionally, this study sought to uncover which theoretical construct - involvement with a specific character or involvement with the narrative more generally (transportation) - best predicted impact. The fictional character in question was Nardelie, a woman forced to flee the Democratic Republic of the Congo after repeated rape by militias vying for "conflict minerals," so named because control of these valuable minerals has triggered numerous conflicts. Separate regression analyses suggested a positive relationship between impact of the storyline and both theoretical constructs. However, when both constructs were entered into a single regression, involvement with Nardelie was the stronger predictor of knowledge (e.g., conflict minerals, sexual violence, and asylum issues) and current or future behavior (i.e., discussing global health) while transportation was the stronger predictor of attitudes (i.e., support for aid). This suggests that, while correlated, these constructs do not completely overlap. Implications of these results and the use of entertainment education in public diplomacy are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信