检查通才专业知识的实践:一项确定约束和解决方案的定性研究。

JRSM short reports Pub Date : 2013-11-21 eCollection Date: 2013-12-01 DOI:10.1177/2042533313510155
Joanne Reeve, Christopher F Dowrick, George K Freeman, Jane Gunn, Frances Mair, Carl May, Stewart Mercer, Victoria Palmer, Amanda Howe, Greg Irving, Alice Shiner, Jessica Watson
{"title":"检查通才专业知识的实践:一项确定约束和解决方案的定性研究。","authors":"Joanne Reeve,&nbsp;Christopher F Dowrick,&nbsp;George K Freeman,&nbsp;Jane Gunn,&nbsp;Frances Mair,&nbsp;Carl May,&nbsp;Stewart Mercer,&nbsp;Victoria Palmer,&nbsp;Amanda Howe,&nbsp;Greg Irving,&nbsp;Alice Shiner,&nbsp;Jessica Watson","doi":"10.1177/2042533313510155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Provision of person-centred generalist care is a core component of quality primary care systems. The World Health Organisation believes that a lack of generalist primary care is contributing to inefficiency, ineffectiveness and inequity in healthcare. In UK primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) are the largest group of practising generalists. Yet GPs fulfil multiple roles and the pressures of delivering these roles along with wider contextual changes create real challenges to generalist practice. Our study aimed to explore GP perceptions of enablers and constraints for expert generalist care, in order to identify what is needed to ensure health systems are designed to support the generalist role.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study in General Practice.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK primary care.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>A qualitative study - interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees. Data collection and analysis was informed by Normalisation Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study in General Practice. We conducted interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees based mainly, but not exclusively, in the UK. Data collection and analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>UK based GPs (interview and surveys); European GP trainees (focus groups).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight key gaps in current training and service design which may limit development and implementation of expert generalist practice (EGP). These include the lack of a consistent and universal understanding of the distinct expertise of EGP, competing priorities inhibiting the delivery of EGP, lack of the consistent development of skills in interpretive practice and a lack of resources for monitoring EGP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WE DESCRIBE FOUR AREAS FOR CHANGE: Translating EGP, Priority setting for EGP, Trusting EGP and Identifying the impact of EGP. We outline proposals for work needed in each area to help enhance the expert generalist role.</p>","PeriodicalId":89182,"journal":{"name":"JRSM short reports","volume":"4 12","pages":"2042533313510155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2042533313510155","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Reeve,&nbsp;Christopher F Dowrick,&nbsp;George K Freeman,&nbsp;Jane Gunn,&nbsp;Frances Mair,&nbsp;Carl May,&nbsp;Stewart Mercer,&nbsp;Victoria Palmer,&nbsp;Amanda Howe,&nbsp;Greg Irving,&nbsp;Alice Shiner,&nbsp;Jessica Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2042533313510155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Provision of person-centred generalist care is a core component of quality primary care systems. The World Health Organisation believes that a lack of generalist primary care is contributing to inefficiency, ineffectiveness and inequity in healthcare. In UK primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) are the largest group of practising generalists. Yet GPs fulfil multiple roles and the pressures of delivering these roles along with wider contextual changes create real challenges to generalist practice. Our study aimed to explore GP perceptions of enablers and constraints for expert generalist care, in order to identify what is needed to ensure health systems are designed to support the generalist role.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study in General Practice.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>UK primary care.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>A qualitative study - interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees. Data collection and analysis was informed by Normalisation Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Qualitative study in General Practice. We conducted interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees based mainly, but not exclusively, in the UK. Data collection and analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>UK based GPs (interview and surveys); European GP trainees (focus groups).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings highlight key gaps in current training and service design which may limit development and implementation of expert generalist practice (EGP). These include the lack of a consistent and universal understanding of the distinct expertise of EGP, competing priorities inhibiting the delivery of EGP, lack of the consistent development of skills in interpretive practice and a lack of resources for monitoring EGP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>WE DESCRIBE FOUR AREAS FOR CHANGE: Translating EGP, Priority setting for EGP, Trusting EGP and Identifying the impact of EGP. We outline proposals for work needed in each area to help enhance the expert generalist role.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JRSM short reports\",\"volume\":\"4 12\",\"pages\":\"2042533313510155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2042533313510155\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JRSM short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313510155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JRSM short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313510155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

目标:提供以人为本的全科护理是优质初级保健系统的核心组成部分。世界卫生组织(World Health organization)认为,缺乏全能型初级保健正在导致医疗保健领域效率低下、无效和不公平。在英国初级保健,全科医生(全科医生)是执业全科医生的最大群体。然而,全科医生扮演着多重角色,履行这些角色的压力以及更广泛的环境变化给全科医生的实践带来了真正的挑战。我们的研究旨在探讨全科医生对专家全科医生护理的推动因素和制约因素的看法,以确定需要什么来确保卫生系统的设计支持全科医生的角色。设计:全科医学的定性研究。环境:英国初级保健。主要结果测量:一项定性研究-与全科医生和全科医生学员的访谈,调查和焦点小组。数据收集和分析采用归一化过程理论。设计与设置:全科医学的定性研究。我们对全科医生和全科医生培训生进行了访谈、调查和焦点小组,主要(但不完全)来自英国。数据收集和分析采用归一化过程理论。参与者:英国全科医生(访谈和调查);欧洲全科医生学员(焦点小组)。结果:我们的研究结果突出了当前培训和服务设计中的关键差距,这些差距可能会限制专家通才实践(EGP)的发展和实施。这些问题包括缺乏对EGP独特专业知识的一致和普遍理解,相互竞争的优先事项阻碍了EGP的提供,在解释实践中缺乏一致的技能发展以及缺乏监测EGP的资源。结论:我们描述了四个需要改变的领域:翻译环境保护计划、为环境保护计划设定优先级、信任环境保护计划和确定环境保护计划的影响。我们概述了每个领域所需工作的建议,以帮助加强专家通才的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.

Examining the practice of generalist expertise: a qualitative study identifying constraints and solutions.

Objectives: Provision of person-centred generalist care is a core component of quality primary care systems. The World Health Organisation believes that a lack of generalist primary care is contributing to inefficiency, ineffectiveness and inequity in healthcare. In UK primary care, General Practitioners (GPs) are the largest group of practising generalists. Yet GPs fulfil multiple roles and the pressures of delivering these roles along with wider contextual changes create real challenges to generalist practice. Our study aimed to explore GP perceptions of enablers and constraints for expert generalist care, in order to identify what is needed to ensure health systems are designed to support the generalist role.

Design: Qualitative study in General Practice.

Setting: UK primary care.

Main outcome measures: A qualitative study - interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees. Data collection and analysis was informed by Normalisation Process Theory.

Design and setting: Qualitative study in General Practice. We conducted interviews, surveys and focus groups with GPs and GP trainees based mainly, but not exclusively, in the UK. Data collection and analysis were informed by Normalization Process Theory.

Participants: UK based GPs (interview and surveys); European GP trainees (focus groups).

Results: Our findings highlight key gaps in current training and service design which may limit development and implementation of expert generalist practice (EGP). These include the lack of a consistent and universal understanding of the distinct expertise of EGP, competing priorities inhibiting the delivery of EGP, lack of the consistent development of skills in interpretive practice and a lack of resources for monitoring EGP.

Conclusions: WE DESCRIBE FOUR AREAS FOR CHANGE: Translating EGP, Priority setting for EGP, Trusting EGP and Identifying the impact of EGP. We outline proposals for work needed in each area to help enhance the expert generalist role.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信