肿瘤标志物切断比及术前癌胚抗原、糖抗原19-9、糖抗原72-4水平联合评分系统在胃癌中的临床应用

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-12-01 Epub Date: 2013-11-26 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283
Jong-Chan Lee, Se Youl Lee, Chan Young Kim, Doo Hyun Yang
{"title":"肿瘤标志物切断比及术前癌胚抗原、糖抗原19-9、糖抗原72-4水平联合评分系统在胃癌中的临床应用","authors":"Jong-Chan Lee,&nbsp;Se Youl Lee,&nbsp;Chan Young Kim,&nbsp;Doo Hyun Yang","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study is to investigate the clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio (TMR) and develop a TMR combination scoring system based on preoperative tumor marker (TM) levels to prognosis prediction in gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We include 1,142 patients for whom two or more TMs were measured and who underwent radical gastrectomy between 1990 and 2003.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year risk of recurrence (5 YRR) for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) TMRs were 18.3%, 29.8%, 61.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 2.0, TMR ≥ 2.0 respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) TMR were 19.7%, 35.6%, 58.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0, TMR ≥ 3.0, respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4) TMR were 15.2% and 33.6% for TMR < 1.0 and TMR ≥ 1.0, respectively. We defined high TMR (TMR ≥ 2.0 for CEA, TMR ≥ 3.0 for CA19-9), low TMR (1.0 ≤ TMR < 2 for CEA, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0 for CA 19-9 and 1.0 ≤ TMR for CA72-4) and negative TMR (TMR < 1.0 for all TMs). A TMR combination scoring system was devised with negative scored as zero points, low as 1 and high as 2 for each TMR. TMR scores were divided into four categories (score 0, 1, 2, 3 and above) based on the calculated TMR score and 5 YRR were found to be 12.8%, 23.9%, 45.5%, and 68.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that our scoring system was a significant independent prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative TMRs such as CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 show a correlation with prognosis and the TMR combination scoring system could be a useful tool for the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"85 6","pages":"283-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Chan Lee,&nbsp;Se Youl Lee,&nbsp;Chan Young Kim,&nbsp;Doo Hyun Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The present study is to investigate the clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio (TMR) and develop a TMR combination scoring system based on preoperative tumor marker (TM) levels to prognosis prediction in gastric cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We include 1,142 patients for whom two or more TMs were measured and who underwent radical gastrectomy between 1990 and 2003.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year risk of recurrence (5 YRR) for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) TMRs were 18.3%, 29.8%, 61.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 2.0, TMR ≥ 2.0 respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) TMR were 19.7%, 35.6%, 58.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0, TMR ≥ 3.0, respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4) TMR were 15.2% and 33.6% for TMR < 1.0 and TMR ≥ 1.0, respectively. We defined high TMR (TMR ≥ 2.0 for CEA, TMR ≥ 3.0 for CA19-9), low TMR (1.0 ≤ TMR < 2 for CEA, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0 for CA 19-9 and 1.0 ≤ TMR for CA72-4) and negative TMR (TMR < 1.0 for all TMs). A TMR combination scoring system was devised with negative scored as zero points, low as 1 and high as 2 for each TMR. TMR scores were divided into four categories (score 0, 1, 2, 3 and above) based on the calculated TMR score and 5 YRR were found to be 12.8%, 23.9%, 45.5%, and 68.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that our scoring system was a significant independent prognostic factor.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative TMRs such as CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 show a correlation with prognosis and the TMR combination scoring system could be a useful tool for the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"volume\":\"85 6\",\"pages\":\"283-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

目的:探讨肿瘤标志物截止比(TMR)的临床应用价值,建立基于术前肿瘤标志物水平的TMR联合评分系统对胃癌预后的预测作用。方法:我们纳入了1142例在1990年至2003年间接受根治性胃切除术的两次或两次以上TMs测量的患者。结果:TMR < 1.0、1.0≤TMR < 2.0、TMR≥2.0组癌胚抗原(CEA) TMR 5年复发风险(5 YRR)分别为18.3%、29.8%、61.4%。5糖类抗原19-9 (CA 19-9) TMR < 1.0、1.0≤TMR < 3.0、TMR≥3.0的YRR分别为19.7%、35.6%、58.4%。TMR < 1.0和≥1.0时,糖类抗原72-4 (CA 72-4) TMR的YRR分别为15.2%和33.6%。我们定义了高TMR (CEA TMR≥2.0,CA19-9 TMR≥3.0),低TMR (CEA 1.0≤TMR < 2, CA19-9 1.0≤TMR < 3.0, CA72-4 1.0≤TMR)和阴性TMR(所有TMs TMR < 1.0)。设计TMR组合评分系统,每组TMR负分值为0分,低为1分,高为2分。根据计算TMR评分将TMR评分分为0分、1分、2分、3分及以上4类,5组YRR分别为12.8%、23.9%、45.5%、68.3% (P < 0.05)。多变量分析显示,我们的评分系统是一个重要的独立预后因素。结论:术前TMR CEA、CA 19-9、CA 72-4与预后有相关性,TMR联合评分系统可作为预测胃癌预后的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.

Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.

Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.

Clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio and a combination scoring system of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carbohydrate antigen 72-4 levels in gastric cancer.

Purpose: The present study is to investigate the clinical utility of tumor marker cutoff ratio (TMR) and develop a TMR combination scoring system based on preoperative tumor marker (TM) levels to prognosis prediction in gastric cancer.

Methods: We include 1,142 patients for whom two or more TMs were measured and who underwent radical gastrectomy between 1990 and 2003.

Results: Five-year risk of recurrence (5 YRR) for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) TMRs were 18.3%, 29.8%, 61.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 2.0, TMR ≥ 2.0 respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) TMR were 19.7%, 35.6%, 58.4% for TMR < 1.0, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0, TMR ≥ 3.0, respectively. 5 YRR for carbohydrate antigen 72-4 (CA 72-4) TMR were 15.2% and 33.6% for TMR < 1.0 and TMR ≥ 1.0, respectively. We defined high TMR (TMR ≥ 2.0 for CEA, TMR ≥ 3.0 for CA19-9), low TMR (1.0 ≤ TMR < 2 for CEA, 1.0 ≤ TMR < 3.0 for CA 19-9 and 1.0 ≤ TMR for CA72-4) and negative TMR (TMR < 1.0 for all TMs). A TMR combination scoring system was devised with negative scored as zero points, low as 1 and high as 2 for each TMR. TMR scores were divided into four categories (score 0, 1, 2, 3 and above) based on the calculated TMR score and 5 YRR were found to be 12.8%, 23.9%, 45.5%, and 68.3%, respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that our scoring system was a significant independent prognostic factor.

Conclusion: Preoperative TMRs such as CEA, CA 19-9, and CA 72-4 show a correlation with prognosis and the TMR combination scoring system could be a useful tool for the prediction of prognosis in gastric cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信