IgM和IgG抗dsdna抗体的共存与活动性狼疮性肾炎无关。

Q4 Medicine
Open Rheumatology Journal Pub Date : 2013-11-15 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874312901307010101
Briele Keiserman, Maria Rita Ronchetti, Odirlei Andre Monticielo, Mauro Waldemar Keiserman, Henrique Luiz Staub
{"title":"IgM和IgG抗dsdna抗体的共存与活动性狼疮性肾炎无关。","authors":"Briele Keiserman,&nbsp;Maria Rita Ronchetti,&nbsp;Odirlei Andre Monticielo,&nbsp;Mauro Waldemar Keiserman,&nbsp;Henrique Luiz Staub","doi":"10.2174/1874312901307010101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE. </p>","PeriodicalId":39124,"journal":{"name":"Open Rheumatology Journal","volume":"7 ","pages":"101-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/94/TORJ-7-101.PMC3866685.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA Antibodies Does Not Appear to Associate to Active Lupus Nephritis.\",\"authors\":\"Briele Keiserman,&nbsp;Maria Rita Ronchetti,&nbsp;Odirlei Andre Monticielo,&nbsp;Mauro Waldemar Keiserman,&nbsp;Henrique Luiz Staub\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874312901307010101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"101-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/94/TORJ-7-101.PMC3866685.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Rheumatology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901307010101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Rheumatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874312901307010101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

既往报道提出IgM抗dsdna抗体对狼疮性肾炎具有保护作用。在这项横断面研究中,我们旨在比较系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者IgG抗dsdna阳性与IgG和IgM抗dsdna阳性的临床特征。在预约当天评估抗dsdna抗体、尿液检查和补体水平。间接免疫荧光法检测IgG和IgM抗dsdna抗体。58例IgG抗dsdna阳性SLE患者(93.1%为女性,81%为欧洲源性,平均年龄42.8±14.7岁,平均病程10.9±8年)进入研究。其中15例IgM抗dsdna同型阳性。与单独使用IgG抗dsdna的患者相比,两种同型组的活动性肾炎(沉积物改变和蛋白尿)发生率显著降低(6.7%对34.9%,p=0.046)。这些数据表明IgM抗dsdna在SLE中具有肾保护作用和独特的生物学行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA Antibodies Does Not Appear to Associate to Active Lupus Nephritis.

Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Rheumatology Journal
Open Rheumatology Journal Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: ENTHAM Open publishes a number of peer-reviewed, open access journals. These free-to-view online journals cover all major disciplines of science, medicine, technology and social sciences. BENTHAM Open provides researchers a platform to rapidly publish their research in a good-quality peer-reviewed journal. All peer-reviewed accepted submissions meeting high research and ethical standards are published with free access to all.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信