安大略省的多专科医生网络。

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2013-05-14 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01
Therese A Stukel, Richard H Glazier, Susan E Schultz, Jun Guan, Brandon M Zagorski, Peter Gozdyra, David A Henry
{"title":"安大略省的多专科医生网络。","authors":"Therese A Stukel,&nbsp;Richard H Glazier,&nbsp;Susan E Schultz,&nbsp;Jun Guan,&nbsp;Brandon M Zagorski,&nbsp;Peter Gozdyra,&nbsp;David A Henry","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed \"loyalty\" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind \"accountable care organizations.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"7 2","pages":"e40-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/7b/OpenMed-07-e40.PMC3863751.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.\",\"authors\":\"Therese A Stukel,&nbsp;Richard H Glazier,&nbsp;Susan E Schultz,&nbsp;Jun Guan,&nbsp;Brandon M Zagorski,&nbsp;Peter Gozdyra,&nbsp;David A Henry\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Large multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed \\\"loyalty\\\" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind \\\"accountable care organizations.\\\"</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"e40-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/7b/OpenMed-07-e40.PMC3863751.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:以初级保健医生为核心角色的大型多专科医师团体实践,已被证明可以为慢性疾病患者实现高质量、低成本的护理。我们评估了安大略省非正式多专科医生网络的识别程度,通过使用卫生管理数据来利用基于现有患者流量的患者、医生和医院之间的自然联系。方法:在2008/2009财政年度至2010/2011财政年度期间,我们将每位安大略省居民与其通常的初级保健提供者联系起来。我们将每个专家与他或她提供最多住院服务的医院联系起来。我们将每位初级保健医生与他或她的大多数门诊病人接受非产妇医疗护理的医院联系起来。然后将每个居民与他或她通常提供初级保健的同一家医院联系起来。我们将“忠诚度”计算为网络内医生和医院对网络居民提供护理的比例。较小的集群被聚合起来,以创建基于最小人口规模、距离和忠诚度的网络。网络不受地域限制。结果:我们确定了78个多专科医生网络,包括12,410名初级保健医生,14,687名专科医生和175家急症护理医院,共服务12,917,178人。网络规模中位数为134,723名居民,125名初级保健医生和143名专家。几乎所有符合条件的居民都与通常的初级保健提供者和网络联系在一起。大多数专科医生(93.5%)和初级保健医生(98.2%)与医院有联系。网络医生忠诚度的中位数为68.4%,初级保健就诊的中位数为81.1%。非产妇入院忠诚度中位数为67.4%。城市网络的忠诚度较低,不太自给自足,但拥有更多的医疗资源。解释:我们证明了在安大略省以求医行为模式为基础确定非正式多专科医生网络的可行性。网络是相当独立的,因为个别居民从各自网络内的提供者那里获得大部分护理。网络的正式构成可以通过护理管理工具和质量改进来促进高效、综合护理的问责制,这是“负责任的护理组织”背后的理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.

Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.

Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.

Multispecialty physician networks in Ontario.

Background: Large multispecialty physician group practices, with a central role for primary care practitioners, have been shown to achieve high-quality, low-cost care for patients with chronic disease. We assessed the extent to which informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario could be identified by using health administrative data to exploit natural linkages among patients, physicians, and hospitals based on existing patient flow.

Methods: We linked each Ontario resident to his or her usual provider of primary care over the period from fiscal year 2008/2009 to fiscal year 2010/2011. We linked each specialist to the hospital where he or she performed the most inpatient services. We linked each primary care physician to the hospital where most of his or her ambulatory patients were admitted for non-maternal medical care. Each resident was then linked to the same hospital as his or her usual provider of primary care. We computed "loyalty" as the proportion of care to network residents provided by physicians and hospitals within their network. Smaller clusters were aggregated to create networks based on a minimum population size, distance, and loyalty. Networks were not constrained geographically.

Results: We identified 78 multispecialty physician networks, comprising 12,410 primary care physicians, 14,687 specialists, and 175 acute care hospitals serving a total of 12,917,178 people. Median network size was 134,723 residents, 125 primary care physicians, and 143 specialists. Virtually all eligible residents were linked to a usual provider of primary care and to a network. Most specialists (93.5%) and primary care physicians (98.2%) were linked to a hospital. Median network physician loyalty was 68.4% for all physician visits and 81.1% for primary care visits. Median non-maternal admission loyalty was 67.4%. Urban networks had lower loyalties and were less self-contained but had more health care resources.

Interpretation: We demonstrated the feasibility of identifying informal multispecialty physician networks in Ontario on the basis of patterns of health care-seeking behaviour. Networks were reasonably self-contained, in that individual residents received most of their care from providers within their respective networks. Formal constitution of networks could foster accountability for efficient, integrated care through care management tools and quality improvement, the ideas behind "accountable care organizations."

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信