2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行活病毒感染对雪貂长效期免疫的免疫保护率高于同源病毒分离疫苗。

Indian Journal of Virology Pub Date : 2012-12-01 Epub Date: 2012-09-28 DOI:10.1007/s13337-012-0076-1
Lingjun Zhan, Wei Deng, Linlin Bao, Qi Lv, Chunmei Ma, Fengdi Li, Lili Xu, Chuan Qin
{"title":"2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行活病毒感染对雪貂长效期免疫的免疫保护率高于同源病毒分离疫苗。","authors":"Lingjun Zhan, Wei Deng, Linlin Bao, Qi Lv, Chunmei Ma, Fengdi Li, Lili Xu, Chuan Qin","doi":"10.1007/s13337-012-0076-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study was to evaluate the long term immunological efficacy of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza live virus infection and split vaccine against the homologous virus challenge in ferrets. Antibodies in ferrets were monitored by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay for 200 days, the HI titers of both infected-only and vaccinated plus infected ferrets could maintain a high level for at least 182 days, without significant difference between the two infected groups. While one-dose and two-dose vaccinated ferrets could last a moderate antibody titers for 81 days, with its peak value at day 7 post immunization. After the virus challenge at day 207, the two groups of vaccinated ferrets shed virus for longer time than the two infected groups, while the latter two groups basically did not shed any virus particles. Furthermore, the vaccinated and infected ferrets which were sacrificed at day 211 exerted moderate immune protection against the challenge by alleviating clinical signs and lung lesion without obvious difference between groups. These data supported that both one-dose and two-dose vaccination of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) split vaccine conferred a moderate protection against challenge after 207 days, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Either the infected only or vaccinated plus infected ones exerted more effective protective immune than one-dose and two-dose vaccination against the challenge, especially in preventing virus shedding, and vaccination primed before infection had no additional efficacy. </p>","PeriodicalId":50370,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Virology","volume":"23 3","pages":"270-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3550788/pdf/13337_2012_Article_76.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher Immunological Protection of Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Influenza Live Virus Infection than Split Vaccine Against the Homologous Virus for Long Term Immunization in Ferret.\",\"authors\":\"Lingjun Zhan, Wei Deng, Linlin Bao, Qi Lv, Chunmei Ma, Fengdi Li, Lili Xu, Chuan Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13337-012-0076-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study was to evaluate the long term immunological efficacy of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza live virus infection and split vaccine against the homologous virus challenge in ferrets. Antibodies in ferrets were monitored by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay for 200 days, the HI titers of both infected-only and vaccinated plus infected ferrets could maintain a high level for at least 182 days, without significant difference between the two infected groups. While one-dose and two-dose vaccinated ferrets could last a moderate antibody titers for 81 days, with its peak value at day 7 post immunization. After the virus challenge at day 207, the two groups of vaccinated ferrets shed virus for longer time than the two infected groups, while the latter two groups basically did not shed any virus particles. Furthermore, the vaccinated and infected ferrets which were sacrificed at day 211 exerted moderate immune protection against the challenge by alleviating clinical signs and lung lesion without obvious difference between groups. These data supported that both one-dose and two-dose vaccination of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) split vaccine conferred a moderate protection against challenge after 207 days, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Either the infected only or vaccinated plus infected ones exerted more effective protective immune than one-dose and two-dose vaccination against the challenge, especially in preventing virus shedding, and vaccination primed before infection had no additional efficacy. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Virology\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"270-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3550788/pdf/13337_2012_Article_76.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-012-0076-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/9/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-012-0076-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究旨在评估2009年甲型H1N1流感大流行活病毒感染和分离疫苗对雪貂同源病毒挑战的长期免疫效力。研究采用血凝抑制(HI)检测法监测雪貂体内的抗体,结果显示,纯感染组和接种疫苗加感染组雪貂的HI滴度均能维持在较高水平,至少182天,且两组之间无显著差异。而接种一剂和两剂疫苗的雪貂能在 81 天内维持中等抗体滴度,其峰值出现在免疫后第 7 天。在第 207 天的病毒挑战后,两组接种疫苗的雪貂比两组感染组的雪貂脱落病毒的时间更长,而后两组雪貂基本上没有脱落任何病毒颗粒。此外,在第 211 天处死的接种组和感染组雪貂对挑战产生了适度的免疫保护作用,临床症状和肺部病变减轻,组间差异不明显。这些数据证明,接种一剂和两剂 2009 年甲型 H1N1 流感裂解疫苗均可在 207 天后对挑战产生中等程度的保护,且两组间无显著差异。与接种一剂和两剂疫苗相比,只接种感染者或接种疫苗加感染者能更有效地发挥保护免疫作用,尤其是在防止病毒脱落方面,而在感染前接种疫苗则没有额外的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher Immunological Protection of Pandemic 2009 H1N1 Influenza Live Virus Infection than Split Vaccine Against the Homologous Virus for Long Term Immunization in Ferret.

The study was to evaluate the long term immunological efficacy of pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza live virus infection and split vaccine against the homologous virus challenge in ferrets. Antibodies in ferrets were monitored by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay for 200 days, the HI titers of both infected-only and vaccinated plus infected ferrets could maintain a high level for at least 182 days, without significant difference between the two infected groups. While one-dose and two-dose vaccinated ferrets could last a moderate antibody titers for 81 days, with its peak value at day 7 post immunization. After the virus challenge at day 207, the two groups of vaccinated ferrets shed virus for longer time than the two infected groups, while the latter two groups basically did not shed any virus particles. Furthermore, the vaccinated and infected ferrets which were sacrificed at day 211 exerted moderate immune protection against the challenge by alleviating clinical signs and lung lesion without obvious difference between groups. These data supported that both one-dose and two-dose vaccination of 2009 influenza A (H1N1) split vaccine conferred a moderate protection against challenge after 207 days, and there was no significant difference between the two groups. Either the infected only or vaccinated plus infected ones exerted more effective protective immune than one-dose and two-dose vaccination against the challenge, especially in preventing virus shedding, and vaccination primed before infection had no additional efficacy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Virology
Indian Journal of Virology 医学-病毒学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信