血管性轻度认知障碍和轻度认知障碍患者的认知主诉分析。

ISRN Neurology Pub Date : 2013-10-28 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2013/865827
Jenny Gu, Corinne E Fischer, Gustavo Saposnik, Tom A Schweizer
{"title":"血管性轻度认知障碍和轻度认知障碍患者的认知主诉分析。","authors":"Jenny Gu,&nbsp;Corinne E Fischer,&nbsp;Gustavo Saposnik,&nbsp;Tom A Schweizer","doi":"10.1155/2013/865827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective. Vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI) is differentiated from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by the presence of vascular events such as stroke or small vessel disease. Typically, MCI and VaMCI patients present with subjective complaints regarding cognition; however, little is known about the specific nature of these complaints. We aimed to create a profile of subjective cognitive complaints in MCI and VaMCI patients with similar levels of objective cognitive performance. Methods. Twenty MCI and twenty VaMCI patients were recruited from a Memory Disorders Clinic in Toronto. Subjective cognitive complaints were assessed and categorized using the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Results. MCI and VaMCI patients achieved similar scores on measures of objective cognitive function (P > 0.100). However, the VaMCI group had more subjective complaints than the MCI group (P = 0.050), particularly in the critical items, cognitive efficiency, memory, and verbal learning domains of the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Conclusions. Our findings support the idea that VaMCI and MCI differ in their clinical profiles, independent of neuroimaging. VaMCI patients have significantly more subjective cognitive complaints and may be exhibiting particular deficits in memory, verbal learning, and cognitive efficiency. Our findings promote the need for further research into VaMCI-specific cognitive deficits. </p>","PeriodicalId":14626,"journal":{"name":"ISRN Neurology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"865827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/865827","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profile of cognitive complaints in vascular mild cognitive impairment and mild cognitive impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Gu,&nbsp;Corinne E Fischer,&nbsp;Gustavo Saposnik,&nbsp;Tom A Schweizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/865827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective. Vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI) is differentiated from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by the presence of vascular events such as stroke or small vessel disease. Typically, MCI and VaMCI patients present with subjective complaints regarding cognition; however, little is known about the specific nature of these complaints. We aimed to create a profile of subjective cognitive complaints in MCI and VaMCI patients with similar levels of objective cognitive performance. Methods. Twenty MCI and twenty VaMCI patients were recruited from a Memory Disorders Clinic in Toronto. Subjective cognitive complaints were assessed and categorized using the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Results. MCI and VaMCI patients achieved similar scores on measures of objective cognitive function (P > 0.100). However, the VaMCI group had more subjective complaints than the MCI group (P = 0.050), particularly in the critical items, cognitive efficiency, memory, and verbal learning domains of the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Conclusions. Our findings support the idea that VaMCI and MCI differ in their clinical profiles, independent of neuroimaging. VaMCI patients have significantly more subjective cognitive complaints and may be exhibiting particular deficits in memory, verbal learning, and cognitive efficiency. Our findings promote the need for further research into VaMCI-specific cognitive deficits. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"865827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/865827\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/865827\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/865827","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目标。血管性轻度认知障碍(VaMCI)与轻度认知障碍(MCI)的区别在于存在血管事件,如中风或小血管疾病。MCI和VaMCI患者通常表现为认知方面的主诉;然而,人们对这些投诉的具体性质知之甚少。我们的目的是建立一个客观认知表现水平相似的MCI和VaMCI患者的主观认知投诉概况。方法。从多伦多一家记忆障碍诊所招募了20名MCI和20名VaMCI患者。使用神经心理障碍量表对主观认知主诉进行评估和分类。结果。MCI和VaMCI患者在客观认知功能方面得分相近(P > 0.100)。然而,VaMCI组比MCI组有更多的主观抱怨(P = 0.050),特别是在神经心理障碍量表的关键项目、认知效率、记忆和语言学习领域。结论。我们的研究结果支持了VaMCI和MCI在临床表现上的不同,独立于神经影像学的观点。VaMCI患者有更多的主观认知主诉,可能在记忆、语言学习和认知效率方面表现出特殊的缺陷。我们的发现促进了进一步研究vamci特异性认知缺陷的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profile of cognitive complaints in vascular mild cognitive impairment and mild cognitive impairment.

Objective. Vascular mild cognitive impairment (VaMCI) is differentiated from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) by the presence of vascular events such as stroke or small vessel disease. Typically, MCI and VaMCI patients present with subjective complaints regarding cognition; however, little is known about the specific nature of these complaints. We aimed to create a profile of subjective cognitive complaints in MCI and VaMCI patients with similar levels of objective cognitive performance. Methods. Twenty MCI and twenty VaMCI patients were recruited from a Memory Disorders Clinic in Toronto. Subjective cognitive complaints were assessed and categorized using the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Results. MCI and VaMCI patients achieved similar scores on measures of objective cognitive function (P > 0.100). However, the VaMCI group had more subjective complaints than the MCI group (P = 0.050), particularly in the critical items, cognitive efficiency, memory, and verbal learning domains of the Neuropsychological Impairment Scale. Conclusions. Our findings support the idea that VaMCI and MCI differ in their clinical profiles, independent of neuroimaging. VaMCI patients have significantly more subjective cognitive complaints and may be exhibiting particular deficits in memory, verbal learning, and cognitive efficiency. Our findings promote the need for further research into VaMCI-specific cognitive deficits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信