E-PASS系统对脊柱外科术后发病率的有效性分析。

Q Medicine
Jun Hirose, Takuya Taniwaki, Toru Fujimoto, Tatsuya Okada, Takayuki Nakamura, Koichiro Usuku, Hiroshi Mizuta
{"title":"E-PASS系统对脊柱外科术后发病率的有效性分析。","authors":"Jun Hirose,&nbsp;Takuya Taniwaki,&nbsp;Toru Fujimoto,&nbsp;Tatsuya Okada,&nbsp;Takayuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Koichiro Usuku,&nbsp;Hiroshi Mizuta","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ability of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) system to predict postoperative risk in patients scheduled for spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The E-PASS system is a surgical audit to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery. It is currently not applied in patients with spinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The E-PASS system is comprised of a preoperative risk score (PRS), a surgical stress score (SSS), and a comprehensive risk score (CRS). The latter reflects both the PRS and SSS. We calculated the E-PASS scores for 275 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery and evaluated the relationship between the incidence of postoperative complications and each score of the E-PASS system and their ability to predict postoperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative complications developed in 31 patients (11.3%). All E-PASS scores were significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications and they were linearly correlated with the overall incidence of postoperative complications. In particular, PRS was correlated with complications at nonsurgical sites and SSS with surgical site complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for PRS and SSS was higher in patients with complications at nonsurgical and surgical sites, respectively. The AUC for CRS exhibited good predictive power for both types of complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The E-PASS system correctly predicted morbidity. The predictive ability of CRS was good for overall morbidity. The E-PASS system is useful for the accurate prediction of the risk for in-hospital morbidity in individual patients scheduled for spinal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50043,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","volume":"28 10","pages":"E595-600"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of E-PASS System for Postoperative Morbidity of Spinal Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Hirose,&nbsp;Takuya Taniwaki,&nbsp;Toru Fujimoto,&nbsp;Tatsuya Okada,&nbsp;Takayuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Koichiro Usuku,&nbsp;Hiroshi Mizuta\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the ability of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) system to predict postoperative risk in patients scheduled for spinal surgery.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The E-PASS system is a surgical audit to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery. It is currently not applied in patients with spinal disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The E-PASS system is comprised of a preoperative risk score (PRS), a surgical stress score (SSS), and a comprehensive risk score (CRS). The latter reflects both the PRS and SSS. We calculated the E-PASS scores for 275 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery and evaluated the relationship between the incidence of postoperative complications and each score of the E-PASS system and their ability to predict postoperative morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative complications developed in 31 patients (11.3%). All E-PASS scores were significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications and they were linearly correlated with the overall incidence of postoperative complications. In particular, PRS was correlated with complications at nonsurgical sites and SSS with surgical site complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for PRS and SSS was higher in patients with complications at nonsurgical and surgical sites, respectively. The AUC for CRS exhibited good predictive power for both types of complication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The E-PASS system correctly predicted morbidity. The predictive ability of CRS was good for overall morbidity. The E-PASS system is useful for the accurate prediction of the risk for in-hospital morbidity in individual patients scheduled for spinal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques\",\"volume\":\"28 10\",\"pages\":\"E595-600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

研究设计:单中心回顾性队列研究。目的:评价生理能力和手术应激评估(E-PASS)系统对脊柱手术患者术后风险的预测能力。背景资料总结:E-PASS系统是一种预测普外科术后发病率和死亡率的外科审计。目前尚未应用于脊柱疾病患者。方法:E-PASS系统由术前风险评分(PRS)、手术压力评分(SSS)和综合风险评分(CRS)组成。后者既反映了公共服务计划,也反映了社会保障计划。我们计算了连续接受脊柱手术的275例患者的E-PASS评分,并评估了术后并发症发生率与E-PASS系统的每个评分及其预测术后发病率的能力之间的关系。结果:术后出现并发症31例(11.3%)。术后并发症患者的所有E-PASS评分均显著较高,且与术后总并发症发生率呈线性相关。特别是,PRS与非手术部位的并发症相关,而SSS与手术部位的并发症相关。在非手术部位和手术部位出现并发症的患者,PRS和SSS的受者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)分别较高。CRS的AUC对两种并发症均有较好的预测能力。结论:E-PASS系统能正确预测发病率。CRS对总发病率的预测能力较好。E-PASS系统可用于准确预测计划进行脊柱手术的个别患者的住院发病率风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity of E-PASS System for Postoperative Morbidity of Spinal Surgery.

Study design: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To evaluate the ability of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) system to predict postoperative risk in patients scheduled for spinal surgery.

Summary of background data: The E-PASS system is a surgical audit to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in general surgery. It is currently not applied in patients with spinal disorders.

Methods: The E-PASS system is comprised of a preoperative risk score (PRS), a surgical stress score (SSS), and a comprehensive risk score (CRS). The latter reflects both the PRS and SSS. We calculated the E-PASS scores for 275 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery and evaluated the relationship between the incidence of postoperative complications and each score of the E-PASS system and their ability to predict postoperative morbidity.

Results: Postoperative complications developed in 31 patients (11.3%). All E-PASS scores were significantly higher in patients with postoperative complications and they were linearly correlated with the overall incidence of postoperative complications. In particular, PRS was correlated with complications at nonsurgical sites and SSS with surgical site complications. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for PRS and SSS was higher in patients with complications at nonsurgical and surgical sites, respectively. The AUC for CRS exhibited good predictive power for both types of complication.

Conclusions: The E-PASS system correctly predicted morbidity. The predictive ability of CRS was good for overall morbidity. The E-PASS system is useful for the accurate prediction of the risk for in-hospital morbidity in individual patients scheduled for spinal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.16
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques features peer-reviewed original articles on diagnosis, management, and surgery for spinal problems. Topics include degenerative disorders, spinal trauma, diagnostic anesthetic blocks, metastatic tumor spinal replacements, management of pain syndromes, and the use of imaging techniques in evaluating lumbar spine disorder. The journal also presents thoroughly documented case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信