Anahita Dua, Bhavin Patel, Jennifer Heller, SreyRam Kuy, Joseph DuBose, Jeffrey S Tomasek, Eric Mowatt Larssen, Sapan S Desai
{"title":"浅静脉血栓性静脉炎的管理在静脉学家和血管外科医生之间的差异。","authors":"Anahita Dua, Bhavin Patel, Jennifer Heller, SreyRam Kuy, Joseph DuBose, Jeffrey S Tomasek, Eric Mowatt Larssen, Sapan S Desai","doi":"10.1177/1531003513506266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare management patterns of patients with superficial venous thrombophlebitis (SVT) among phlebologists and vascular surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was provided to practitioners who attended the American Venous Forum meeting in 2011. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, unpaired t tests, and Friedman's test for correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 354 US or Canadian health care providers of whom 169 were phlebologists and 185 were vascular surgeons. There was a significant different in anticoagulation administration and duration (P = .034, P = .032, respectively). Friedman's test for correlation between multiple surgical treatments showed no correlation between surgical treatments tested with all treatments having an equal distribution in our data. Follow-up differed between groups with vascular surgeons following up with imaging more than phlebologists (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data indicate that there is no consensus between or among phlebologists or vascular surgeons as to the surgical management of superficial venous thrombophlebitis, duration of follow-up, and anticoagulation parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":87201,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","volume":"25 1-2","pages":"5-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003513506266","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in the management of superficial venous thrombophlebitis among phlebologists and vascular surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Anahita Dua, Bhavin Patel, Jennifer Heller, SreyRam Kuy, Joseph DuBose, Jeffrey S Tomasek, Eric Mowatt Larssen, Sapan S Desai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1531003513506266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare management patterns of patients with superficial venous thrombophlebitis (SVT) among phlebologists and vascular surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was provided to practitioners who attended the American Venous Forum meeting in 2011. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, unpaired t tests, and Friedman's test for correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 354 US or Canadian health care providers of whom 169 were phlebologists and 185 were vascular surgeons. There was a significant different in anticoagulation administration and duration (P = .034, P = .032, respectively). Friedman's test for correlation between multiple surgical treatments showed no correlation between surgical treatments tested with all treatments having an equal distribution in our data. Follow-up differed between groups with vascular surgeons following up with imaging more than phlebologists (P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data indicate that there is no consensus between or among phlebologists or vascular surgeons as to the surgical management of superficial venous thrombophlebitis, duration of follow-up, and anticoagulation parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":87201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\"25 1-2\",\"pages\":\"5-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1531003513506266\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003513506266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/11/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1531003513506266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
简介:本研究旨在比较静脉内科医生和血管外科医生对浅静脉血栓性静脉炎(SVT)患者的治疗模式。方法:对参加2011年美国静脉论坛会议的从业者进行调查。统计分析包括描述性统计、非配对t检验和弗里德曼相关性检验。结果:共有354名美国或加拿大医疗服务提供者,其中169名是静脉内科医生,185名是血管外科医生。两组在抗凝治疗剂量和持续时间上差异有统计学意义(P = 0.034, P = 0.032)。弗里德曼对多种手术治疗之间相关性的检验显示,在我们的数据中,所有手术治疗之间的相关性都是相等的。随访组间差异较大,血管外科医生影像学随访多于静脉内科医生(P = .03)。结论:我们的数据表明,对于浅表静脉血栓性静脉炎的手术治疗、随访时间和抗凝参数,在静脉学家或血管外科医生之间没有达成共识。
Variability in the management of superficial venous thrombophlebitis among phlebologists and vascular surgeons.
Introduction: This study aimed to compare management patterns of patients with superficial venous thrombophlebitis (SVT) among phlebologists and vascular surgeons.
Methods: A survey was provided to practitioners who attended the American Venous Forum meeting in 2011. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, unpaired t tests, and Friedman's test for correlation.
Results: There were 354 US or Canadian health care providers of whom 169 were phlebologists and 185 were vascular surgeons. There was a significant different in anticoagulation administration and duration (P = .034, P = .032, respectively). Friedman's test for correlation between multiple surgical treatments showed no correlation between surgical treatments tested with all treatments having an equal distribution in our data. Follow-up differed between groups with vascular surgeons following up with imaging more than phlebologists (P = .03).
Conclusion: Our data indicate that there is no consensus between or among phlebologists or vascular surgeons as to the surgical management of superficial venous thrombophlebitis, duration of follow-up, and anticoagulation parameters.