护士为克服电子健康记录的设计限制而使用的变通方法。

Sarah A Collins, Matthew Fred, Lauren Wilcox, David K Vawdrey
{"title":"护士为克服电子健康记录的设计限制而使用的变通方法。","authors":"Sarah A Collins,&nbsp;Matthew Fred,&nbsp;Lauren Wilcox,&nbsp;David K Vawdrey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has the potential to assist with clinical reasoning and streamline workflow; however, the data entry and review capabilities of most systems are suboptimal which may lead to workarounds. As an instance of a workaround, we examined nurses' use of optional free-text comments in EHR flowsheets to support clinical needs for data interpretation. This mixed-method study included: 1) Content analysis of comments, 2) Interviews with nurses. We performed a sub-analysis of flowsheet data for 201 patients that experienced a cardiac arrest and interviewed 5 acute care nurses. We found that nurses used workarounds in the EHR - despite the extra effort that they required - to convey clinically significant relationships and to communicate concerning events to physicians. EHRs should better support entry of clinical data that \"belongs together\" and enable messaging capabilities integrated with nurses' flowsheet documentation workflow. </p>","PeriodicalId":90025,"journal":{"name":"NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)","volume":"2012 ","pages":"93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799185/pdf/amia_2012_ni_093.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workarounds used by nurses to overcome design constraints of electronic health records.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah A Collins,&nbsp;Matthew Fred,&nbsp;Lauren Wilcox,&nbsp;David K Vawdrey\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has the potential to assist with clinical reasoning and streamline workflow; however, the data entry and review capabilities of most systems are suboptimal which may lead to workarounds. As an instance of a workaround, we examined nurses' use of optional free-text comments in EHR flowsheets to support clinical needs for data interpretation. This mixed-method study included: 1) Content analysis of comments, 2) Interviews with nurses. We performed a sub-analysis of flowsheet data for 201 patients that experienced a cardiac arrest and interviewed 5 acute care nurses. We found that nurses used workarounds in the EHR - despite the extra effort that they required - to convey clinically significant relationships and to communicate concerning events to physicians. EHRs should better support entry of clinical data that \\\"belongs together\\\" and enable messaging capabilities integrated with nurses' flowsheet documentation workflow. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3799185/pdf/amia_2012_ni_093.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NI 2012 : 11th International Congress on Nursing Informatics, June 23-27, 2012, Montreal, Canada. International Congress in Nursing Informatics (11th : 2012 : Montreal, Quebec)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用电子健康记录(EHRs)有助于临床推理和简化工作流程;然而,大多数系统的数据输入和审查功能都不是最优的,这可能会导致变通。作为解决方案的一个实例,我们检查了护士在电子病历流程中使用可选的自由文本注释来支持临床需要的数据解释。本混合方法研究包括:1)评论内容分析;2)护士访谈。我们对201例心脏骤停患者的流程数据进行了亚分析,并采访了5名急症护理护士。我们发现护士在电子病历中使用变通方法——尽管他们需要额外的努力——来传达临床重要的关系,并与医生沟通有关的事件。电子病历应该更好地支持“属于一起”的临床数据的输入,并使消息传递功能与护士的流程文档工作流程集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workarounds used by nurses to overcome design constraints of electronic health records.

Adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) has the potential to assist with clinical reasoning and streamline workflow; however, the data entry and review capabilities of most systems are suboptimal which may lead to workarounds. As an instance of a workaround, we examined nurses' use of optional free-text comments in EHR flowsheets to support clinical needs for data interpretation. This mixed-method study included: 1) Content analysis of comments, 2) Interviews with nurses. We performed a sub-analysis of flowsheet data for 201 patients that experienced a cardiac arrest and interviewed 5 acute care nurses. We found that nurses used workarounds in the EHR - despite the extra effort that they required - to convey clinically significant relationships and to communicate concerning events to physicians. EHRs should better support entry of clinical data that "belongs together" and enable messaging capabilities integrated with nurses' flowsheet documentation workflow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信