使用检测方法诊断结核感染方面的挑战。

Ben J Marais
{"title":"使用检测方法诊断结核感染方面的挑战。","authors":"Ben J Marais","doi":"10.1071/NB13012b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Congratulations on the publication of the ‘‘Tuberculosis in NSW’’ edition (2013; 24(1)). It makes excellent reading on a disease that continues to smoulder in this country. However, there is one topic on which some authors appear unclear: the limitations of immunological tests for both tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection. I refer to the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), in particular the QuantiFERON-Gold In Tube (QFT-Gold IT). Certainly Britton et al are correct in stating the unreliability of such tests in infants under the age of 2. Indeed, these tests have little application in diagnosing disease, but are the only diagnostic agents we have for infection. It is not good enough for authors to tell us that the TST is negative or positive since this means nothing in an investigation where we have to balance sensitivity against specificity. A TST threshold of 10mm induration might be said to achieve this balance, but the QFT-Gold IT shows that it does not. Across the world, tuberculins are produced that are of different potency, are recommended to be given in different doses (not always 10 units), and a ‘‘positive induration’’ may be less than 10mm. Therefore authors should be encouraged to tell us what dose of which tuberculin has achieved what degree of induration. Although IGRAs are reported as positive and negative, this is dependant on an arbitrary cut-off point. The criterion we use for a ‘‘positive’’ TST in Australia may be sensitive, but has poor specificity and for QFT-Gold IT, mediocre sensitivity, if good specificity. I am surprised that none of the articles dealing with TB infection mention the use of both tests being used together (except in the BCGvaccinated), a strategy thatwe inAustralia can surely afford.","PeriodicalId":29974,"journal":{"name":"NSW Public Health Bulletin","volume":"24 2","pages":"92-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in the use of tests to diagnose tuberculosis infection.\",\"authors\":\"Ben J Marais\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/NB13012b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Congratulations on the publication of the ‘‘Tuberculosis in NSW’’ edition (2013; 24(1)). It makes excellent reading on a disease that continues to smoulder in this country. However, there is one topic on which some authors appear unclear: the limitations of immunological tests for both tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection. I refer to the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), in particular the QuantiFERON-Gold In Tube (QFT-Gold IT). Certainly Britton et al are correct in stating the unreliability of such tests in infants under the age of 2. Indeed, these tests have little application in diagnosing disease, but are the only diagnostic agents we have for infection. It is not good enough for authors to tell us that the TST is negative or positive since this means nothing in an investigation where we have to balance sensitivity against specificity. A TST threshold of 10mm induration might be said to achieve this balance, but the QFT-Gold IT shows that it does not. Across the world, tuberculins are produced that are of different potency, are recommended to be given in different doses (not always 10 units), and a ‘‘positive induration’’ may be less than 10mm. Therefore authors should be encouraged to tell us what dose of which tuberculin has achieved what degree of induration. Although IGRAs are reported as positive and negative, this is dependant on an arbitrary cut-off point. The criterion we use for a ‘‘positive’’ TST in Australia may be sensitive, but has poor specificity and for QFT-Gold IT, mediocre sensitivity, if good specificity. I am surprised that none of the articles dealing with TB infection mention the use of both tests being used together (except in the BCGvaccinated), a strategy thatwe inAustralia can surely afford.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NSW Public Health Bulletin\",\"volume\":\"24 2\",\"pages\":\"92-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NSW Public Health Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/NB13012b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NSW Public Health Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/NB13012b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in the use of tests to diagnose tuberculosis infection.
Congratulations on the publication of the ‘‘Tuberculosis in NSW’’ edition (2013; 24(1)). It makes excellent reading on a disease that continues to smoulder in this country. However, there is one topic on which some authors appear unclear: the limitations of immunological tests for both tuberculosis (TB) disease and infection. I refer to the tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), in particular the QuantiFERON-Gold In Tube (QFT-Gold IT). Certainly Britton et al are correct in stating the unreliability of such tests in infants under the age of 2. Indeed, these tests have little application in diagnosing disease, but are the only diagnostic agents we have for infection. It is not good enough for authors to tell us that the TST is negative or positive since this means nothing in an investigation where we have to balance sensitivity against specificity. A TST threshold of 10mm induration might be said to achieve this balance, but the QFT-Gold IT shows that it does not. Across the world, tuberculins are produced that are of different potency, are recommended to be given in different doses (not always 10 units), and a ‘‘positive induration’’ may be less than 10mm. Therefore authors should be encouraged to tell us what dose of which tuberculin has achieved what degree of induration. Although IGRAs are reported as positive and negative, this is dependant on an arbitrary cut-off point. The criterion we use for a ‘‘positive’’ TST in Australia may be sensitive, but has poor specificity and for QFT-Gold IT, mediocre sensitivity, if good specificity. I am surprised that none of the articles dealing with TB infection mention the use of both tests being used together (except in the BCGvaccinated), a strategy thatwe inAustralia can surely afford.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信