慢性咳嗽和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停在睡眠实验室肺实践。

Tsai-Yu Wang, Yu-Lun Lo, Wen-Te Liu, Shu-Min Lin, Ting-Yu Lin, Chih-Hsi Kuo, Fu-Tsai Chung, Pai-Chien Chou, Po-Jui Chang, Yung-Lun Ni, Shu-Chuan Ho, Horng-Chyuan Lin, Chun-Hua Wang, Chih-Teng Yu, Han-Pin Kuo
{"title":"慢性咳嗽和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停在睡眠实验室肺实践。","authors":"Tsai-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Yu-Lun Lo,&nbsp;Wen-Te Liu,&nbsp;Shu-Min Lin,&nbsp;Ting-Yu Lin,&nbsp;Chih-Hsi Kuo,&nbsp;Fu-Tsai Chung,&nbsp;Pai-Chien Chou,&nbsp;Po-Jui Chang,&nbsp;Yung-Lun Ni,&nbsp;Shu-Chuan Ho,&nbsp;Horng-Chyuan Lin,&nbsp;Chun-Hua Wang,&nbsp;Chih-Teng Yu,&nbsp;Han-Pin Kuo","doi":"10.1186/1745-9974-9-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has recently been identified as a possible aetiology for chronic cough. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic cough between patients with and without OSA and the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in resolving chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to the sleep laboratory from January 2012 to June 2012 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data, treatment course and resolution of chronic cough were analysed. Specifically, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD), upper airway cough syndrome, asthma, apnoea-hypopnoea index and the impact of CPAP treatment on chronic cough were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 patients were reviewed. The incidence of chronic cough in the OSA group was significantly higher than the non-OSA group (39/99 (39.4%) vs. 4/32 (12.5%), p = 0.005). Both GERD and apnoea-hypopnoea index were significantly associated with chronic cough in univariate analysis. After multivariate logistic regression, GERD was the only independent factor for chronic cough. Moreover, the resolution of chronic cough was more significant in the OSA patients with CPAP treatment compared with those not receiving CPAP treatment (12/18 (66.7%) vs. 2/21 (9.5%), p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of chronic cough was significantly higher in the OSA patients. In addition, CPAP treatment significantly improved chronic cough. Therefore, OSA may be a contributory factor to chronic cough.</p>","PeriodicalId":10747,"journal":{"name":"Cough (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-9-24","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic cough and obstructive sleep apnoea in a sleep laboratory-based pulmonary practice.\",\"authors\":\"Tsai-Yu Wang,&nbsp;Yu-Lun Lo,&nbsp;Wen-Te Liu,&nbsp;Shu-Min Lin,&nbsp;Ting-Yu Lin,&nbsp;Chih-Hsi Kuo,&nbsp;Fu-Tsai Chung,&nbsp;Pai-Chien Chou,&nbsp;Po-Jui Chang,&nbsp;Yung-Lun Ni,&nbsp;Shu-Chuan Ho,&nbsp;Horng-Chyuan Lin,&nbsp;Chun-Hua Wang,&nbsp;Chih-Teng Yu,&nbsp;Han-Pin Kuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/1745-9974-9-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has recently been identified as a possible aetiology for chronic cough. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic cough between patients with and without OSA and the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in resolving chronic cough.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to the sleep laboratory from January 2012 to June 2012 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data, treatment course and resolution of chronic cough were analysed. Specifically, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD), upper airway cough syndrome, asthma, apnoea-hypopnoea index and the impact of CPAP treatment on chronic cough were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 131 patients were reviewed. The incidence of chronic cough in the OSA group was significantly higher than the non-OSA group (39/99 (39.4%) vs. 4/32 (12.5%), p = 0.005). Both GERD and apnoea-hypopnoea index were significantly associated with chronic cough in univariate analysis. After multivariate logistic regression, GERD was the only independent factor for chronic cough. Moreover, the resolution of chronic cough was more significant in the OSA patients with CPAP treatment compared with those not receiving CPAP treatment (12/18 (66.7%) vs. 2/21 (9.5%), p = 0.010).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of chronic cough was significantly higher in the OSA patients. In addition, CPAP treatment significantly improved chronic cough. Therefore, OSA may be a contributory factor to chronic cough.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-9974-9-24\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cough (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-9-24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cough (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-9974-9-24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)最近被确定为慢性咳嗽的可能病因。本研究的目的是比较阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者和非OSA患者慢性咳嗽的发生率,以及持续气道正压通气(CPAP)治疗对慢性咳嗽的影响。方法:回顾性分析2012年1月至2012年6月在睡眠实验室就诊的患者。分析慢性咳嗽患者的临床资料、治疗过程及缓解情况。具体而言,评估胃食管反流(GERD)、上呼吸道咳嗽综合征、哮喘、呼吸暂停低通气指数以及CPAP治疗对慢性咳嗽的影响。结果:共纳入131例患者。OSA组慢性咳嗽发生率明显高于非OSA组(39/99(39.4%)比4/32 (12.5%),p = 0.005)。单因素分析显示,胃食管反流和呼吸暂停-低通气指数均与慢性咳嗽显著相关。经多因素logistic回归分析,胃食管反流是慢性咳嗽的唯一独立因素。此外,与未接受CPAP治疗的OSA患者相比,接受CPAP治疗的OSA患者慢性咳嗽的缓解更为显著(12/18(66.7%)比2/21 (9.5%),p = 0.010)。结论:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者慢性咳嗽的发生率明显增高。此外,CPAP治疗可显著改善慢性咳嗽。因此,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停可能是慢性咳嗽的一个因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic cough and obstructive sleep apnoea in a sleep laboratory-based pulmonary practice.

Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has recently been identified as a possible aetiology for chronic cough. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic cough between patients with and without OSA and the impact of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in resolving chronic cough.

Methods: Patients referred to the sleep laboratory from January 2012 to June 2012 were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical data, treatment course and resolution of chronic cough were analysed. Specifically, gastro-oesophageal reflux (GERD), upper airway cough syndrome, asthma, apnoea-hypopnoea index and the impact of CPAP treatment on chronic cough were assessed.

Results: A total of 131 patients were reviewed. The incidence of chronic cough in the OSA group was significantly higher than the non-OSA group (39/99 (39.4%) vs. 4/32 (12.5%), p = 0.005). Both GERD and apnoea-hypopnoea index were significantly associated with chronic cough in univariate analysis. After multivariate logistic regression, GERD was the only independent factor for chronic cough. Moreover, the resolution of chronic cough was more significant in the OSA patients with CPAP treatment compared with those not receiving CPAP treatment (12/18 (66.7%) vs. 2/21 (9.5%), p = 0.010).

Conclusion: The incidence of chronic cough was significantly higher in the OSA patients. In addition, CPAP treatment significantly improved chronic cough. Therefore, OSA may be a contributory factor to chronic cough.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信