经过9年的目标驱动治疗,272名初级保健患者的HbA1c值向目标趋同。

Quality in primary care Pub Date : 2013-01-01
E L Clarke, J R Richardson, M Bhartia, D M Kennedy, J J Milles, S Ramachandran
{"title":"经过9年的目标驱动治疗,272名初级保健患者的HbA1c值向目标趋同。","authors":"E L Clarke,&nbsp;J R Richardson,&nbsp;M Bhartia,&nbsp;D M Kennedy,&nbsp;J J Milles,&nbsp;S Ramachandran","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We wished to determine the effect of a target-driven incentivised programme on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) values in a UK diabetic population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An audit was carried out in 1999-2000, which included an estimation of glycaemic control in a randomly selected diabetic cohort from ten primary care practices in Sutton Coldfield, serving a population of 90 000 patients. Each practice was given a randomised list of patients and asked to complete detailed questionnaires on patients with confirmed diabetes. We collected data on 516 patients, 425 of whom had their HbA1c measured in 1999-2000 (Audit 2000). A re-audit of HbA1c was carried out in 2007-08 (Audit 2008) determining the changes in HbA1c since the original audit. Of the original cohort, 272 patients had an audit of HbA1c carried out in Audit 2008.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a small increase in median and mean HbA1c values was observed. We estimated that the proportion of patients with HbA1c achieving the lower Quality and Outcomes Framework HbA1c target of < 7.5%; 173 of the 272 patients met this target in Audit 2000, whereas the number was 162 in Audit 2008. To understand the changes observed, patients were stratified as quintiles based on the HbA1c in Audit 2000 and changes in HbA1c after 8 years for each quintile were estimated. The mean changes for the different quintiles are: quintile 1 (HbA1c < 6.1%), +1.49%; quintile 2 (HbA1c 6.1- 6.6%), +0.8%; quintile 3 (HbA1c 6.7-7.3%), +0.3%; quintile 4 (HbA1c 7.4-8.5%), -0.18%; and quintile 5 (HbA1c > 8.5%), -1.55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that, eight years on, patients with poor glycaemic control in 2000 saw an overall decrease in HbA1c by 2008, with the reverse seen in patients with good control.</p>","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"21 5","pages":"287-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Convergence of HbA1c values towards target in 272 primary care patients following nine years of target-driven care.\",\"authors\":\"E L Clarke,&nbsp;J R Richardson,&nbsp;M Bhartia,&nbsp;D M Kennedy,&nbsp;J J Milles,&nbsp;S Ramachandran\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We wished to determine the effect of a target-driven incentivised programme on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) values in a UK diabetic population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An audit was carried out in 1999-2000, which included an estimation of glycaemic control in a randomly selected diabetic cohort from ten primary care practices in Sutton Coldfield, serving a population of 90 000 patients. Each practice was given a randomised list of patients and asked to complete detailed questionnaires on patients with confirmed diabetes. We collected data on 516 patients, 425 of whom had their HbA1c measured in 1999-2000 (Audit 2000). A re-audit of HbA1c was carried out in 2007-08 (Audit 2008) determining the changes in HbA1c since the original audit. Of the original cohort, 272 patients had an audit of HbA1c carried out in Audit 2008.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, a small increase in median and mean HbA1c values was observed. We estimated that the proportion of patients with HbA1c achieving the lower Quality and Outcomes Framework HbA1c target of < 7.5%; 173 of the 272 patients met this target in Audit 2000, whereas the number was 162 in Audit 2008. To understand the changes observed, patients were stratified as quintiles based on the HbA1c in Audit 2000 and changes in HbA1c after 8 years for each quintile were estimated. The mean changes for the different quintiles are: quintile 1 (HbA1c < 6.1%), +1.49%; quintile 2 (HbA1c 6.1- 6.6%), +0.8%; quintile 3 (HbA1c 6.7-7.3%), +0.3%; quintile 4 (HbA1c 7.4-8.5%), -0.18%; and quintile 5 (HbA1c > 8.5%), -1.55%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that, eight years on, patients with poor glycaemic control in 2000 saw an overall decrease in HbA1c by 2008, with the reverse seen in patients with good control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"287-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们希望确定靶标驱动激励方案对英国糖尿病人群中血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)值的影响。方法:1999-2000年进行了一项审计,其中包括从萨顿科尔菲尔德的10个初级保健实践中随机选择的糖尿病队列的血糖控制估计,服务于90000名患者。每个诊所都有一份随机的患者名单,并要求他们完成关于确诊糖尿病患者的详细问卷调查。我们收集了516例患者的数据,其中425例患者在1999-2000年间测量了他们的HbA1c (Audit 2000)。在2007-08年进行了一次糖化血红蛋白的重新审核(2008年审核),确定了自最初审核以来糖化血红蛋白的变化。在最初的队列中,272名患者在审计2008年进行了HbA1c审计。结果:总体而言,观察到中位值和平均HbA1c值略有增加。我们估计HbA1c达到较低质量和结局框架HbA1c目标的患者比例< 7.5%;在2000年的审计中,272名患者中有173名达到了这一目标,而在2008年的审计中,这一数字为162名。为了了解观察到的变化,在审计2000中,根据HbA1c将患者分层为五分位数,并估计每个五分位数8年后的HbA1c变化。不同五分位数的平均变化为:五分位数1 (HbA1c < 6.1%), +1.49%;五分位数2 (HbA1c 6.1- 6.6%), +0.8%;五分位数3 (HbA1c 6.7-7.3%), +0.3%;四分之一组(HbA1c 7.4-8.5%), -0.18%;五分位数(HbA1c > 8.5%), -1.55%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,8年后,2000年血糖控制不良的患者到2008年HbA1c总体下降,而控制良好的患者则相反。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Convergence of HbA1c values towards target in 272 primary care patients following nine years of target-driven care.

Background: We wished to determine the effect of a target-driven incentivised programme on haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c ) values in a UK diabetic population.

Methods: An audit was carried out in 1999-2000, which included an estimation of glycaemic control in a randomly selected diabetic cohort from ten primary care practices in Sutton Coldfield, serving a population of 90 000 patients. Each practice was given a randomised list of patients and asked to complete detailed questionnaires on patients with confirmed diabetes. We collected data on 516 patients, 425 of whom had their HbA1c measured in 1999-2000 (Audit 2000). A re-audit of HbA1c was carried out in 2007-08 (Audit 2008) determining the changes in HbA1c since the original audit. Of the original cohort, 272 patients had an audit of HbA1c carried out in Audit 2008.

Results: Overall, a small increase in median and mean HbA1c values was observed. We estimated that the proportion of patients with HbA1c achieving the lower Quality and Outcomes Framework HbA1c target of < 7.5%; 173 of the 272 patients met this target in Audit 2000, whereas the number was 162 in Audit 2008. To understand the changes observed, patients were stratified as quintiles based on the HbA1c in Audit 2000 and changes in HbA1c after 8 years for each quintile were estimated. The mean changes for the different quintiles are: quintile 1 (HbA1c < 6.1%), +1.49%; quintile 2 (HbA1c 6.1- 6.6%), +0.8%; quintile 3 (HbA1c 6.7-7.3%), +0.3%; quintile 4 (HbA1c 7.4-8.5%), -0.18%; and quintile 5 (HbA1c > 8.5%), -1.55%.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that, eight years on, patients with poor glycaemic control in 2000 saw an overall decrease in HbA1c by 2008, with the reverse seen in patients with good control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信