探索观察研究的伦理:坦桑尼亚艾滋病研究案例。

Alison Norris, Ashley Jackson, Kaveh Khoshnood
{"title":"探索观察研究的伦理:坦桑尼亚艾滋病研究案例。","authors":"Alison Norris, Ashley Jackson, Kaveh Khoshnood","doi":"10.1080/21507716.2012.714836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies have generally been viewed as incurring minimal risk to participants, resulting in fewer ethical obligations for investigators than intervention studies. In 2004, the lead author (AN) carried out an observational study measuring sexual behavior and the prevalence of HIV, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), among Tanzanian agricultural plantation residents (results reported elsewhere). This article uses an ethical lens to consider the consequences of the observational study and explore what, if any, effects it had on participants and their community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a case study approach, we critically examine three core principles of research ethics-respect for persons/autonomy; beneficence/nonmaleficence; and distributive justice-as manifested in the 2004 observational study. We base our findings on three sources: discussions with plantation residents following presentations of observational research findings; in-depth interviews with key informants; and researcher observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observational research team was found to have ensured confidentiality and noncoercive recruitment. Ironically, maintenance of confidentiality and voluntary participation led some participants to doubt study results. Receiving HIV test results was important for participants and contributed to changing community norms about HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observational studies may act like <i>de facto</i> intervention studies and thus incur obligations similar to those of intervention studies. We found that ensuring respect for persons may have compromised the principles of beneficence and distributive justice. While in theory these three ethical principles have equal moral force, in practice, researchers may have to prioritize one over the others. Careful community engagement is necessary to promote well-considered ethical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":89316,"journal":{"name":"AJOB primary research","volume":"3 4","pages":"30-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779918/pdf/nihms-504270.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Ethics of Observational Research: The Case of an HIV Study in Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Alison Norris, Ashley Jackson, Kaveh Khoshnood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21507716.2012.714836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational studies have generally been viewed as incurring minimal risk to participants, resulting in fewer ethical obligations for investigators than intervention studies. In 2004, the lead author (AN) carried out an observational study measuring sexual behavior and the prevalence of HIV, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), among Tanzanian agricultural plantation residents (results reported elsewhere). This article uses an ethical lens to consider the consequences of the observational study and explore what, if any, effects it had on participants and their community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a case study approach, we critically examine three core principles of research ethics-respect for persons/autonomy; beneficence/nonmaleficence; and distributive justice-as manifested in the 2004 observational study. We base our findings on three sources: discussions with plantation residents following presentations of observational research findings; in-depth interviews with key informants; and researcher observations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observational research team was found to have ensured confidentiality and noncoercive recruitment. Ironically, maintenance of confidentiality and voluntary participation led some participants to doubt study results. Receiving HIV test results was important for participants and contributed to changing community norms about HIV testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Observational studies may act like <i>de facto</i> intervention studies and thus incur obligations similar to those of intervention studies. We found that ensuring respect for persons may have compromised the principles of beneficence and distributive justice. While in theory these three ethical principles have equal moral force, in practice, researchers may have to prioritize one over the others. Careful community engagement is necessary to promote well-considered ethical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"volume\":\"3 4\",\"pages\":\"30-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3779918/pdf/nihms-504270.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJOB primary research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.714836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB primary research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2012.714836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察性研究通常被认为对参与者的风险极小,因此与干预性研究相比,调查者承担的伦理义务较少。2004 年,第一作者(AN)开展了一项观察性研究,测量坦桑尼亚农业种植园居民的性行为以及 HIV、梅毒和单纯疱疹病毒 2 型(HSV-2)的流行情况(结果已在其他地方报道)。本文采用伦理视角来考虑观察性研究的后果,并探讨该研究对参与者及其社区产生了哪些影响(如果有的话):方法:我们采用案例研究的方法,批判性地考察了 2004 年观察性研究中体现出的研究伦理的三个核心原则:尊重人/自主性;受益/非渎职;分配公正。我们的研究结果基于三个来源:在介绍观察研究结果后与种植园居民的讨论;对主要信息提供者的深入访谈;以及研究人员的观察:我们发现,观察研究小组确保了保密性和非胁迫性招募。具有讽刺意味的是,保密和自愿参与使一些参与者对研究结果产生了怀疑。获得 HIV 检测结果对参与者很重要,有助于改变社区对 HIV 检测的规范:观察性研究可能就像事实上的干预研究,因此需要承担与干预研究类似的义务。我们发现,确保对人的尊重可能会损害到受益原则和分配公正原则。虽然从理论上讲,这三项伦理原则具有同等的道德力量,但在实践中,研究人员可能不得不优先考虑其中一项原则。为了促进深思熟虑的伦理决策,有必要让社区认真参与进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Ethics of Observational Research: The Case of an HIV Study in Tanzania.

Background: Observational studies have generally been viewed as incurring minimal risk to participants, resulting in fewer ethical obligations for investigators than intervention studies. In 2004, the lead author (AN) carried out an observational study measuring sexual behavior and the prevalence of HIV, syphilis, and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), among Tanzanian agricultural plantation residents (results reported elsewhere). This article uses an ethical lens to consider the consequences of the observational study and explore what, if any, effects it had on participants and their community.

Methods: Using a case study approach, we critically examine three core principles of research ethics-respect for persons/autonomy; beneficence/nonmaleficence; and distributive justice-as manifested in the 2004 observational study. We base our findings on three sources: discussions with plantation residents following presentations of observational research findings; in-depth interviews with key informants; and researcher observations.

Results: The observational research team was found to have ensured confidentiality and noncoercive recruitment. Ironically, maintenance of confidentiality and voluntary participation led some participants to doubt study results. Receiving HIV test results was important for participants and contributed to changing community norms about HIV testing.

Conclusions: Observational studies may act like de facto intervention studies and thus incur obligations similar to those of intervention studies. We found that ensuring respect for persons may have compromised the principles of beneficence and distributive justice. While in theory these three ethical principles have equal moral force, in practice, researchers may have to prioritize one over the others. Careful community engagement is necessary to promote well-considered ethical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信