德语医学期末考试口语和实践部分培训的效果和可持续性。

GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung Pub Date : 2013-08-15 eCollection Date: 2013-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma000879
Wolfgang Öchsner, Sandra Geiler, Markus Huber-Lang
{"title":"德语医学期末考试口语和实践部分培训的效果和可持续性。","authors":"Wolfgang Öchsner,&nbsp;Sandra Geiler,&nbsp;Markus Huber-Lang","doi":"10.3205/zma000879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study goals: </strong>It is known that the manifold limitations of oral and practical examinations can be improved by specific training. With the help of an online survey, our present study analyzes the effects that can be achieved by the training conducted at the University of Ulm for examiners in the final medical examination, the long-lasting impact of the training, and differences among participant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All 367 participants in the training at Ulm (2007- 2012) were contacted via email. Sixty-three persons responded to the survey that included 28 items concerning demographic data, effectiveness, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main effects of the training were identified (meaning effects rated with a grade of 1 or 2 on a 6-point scale by two thirds of the participants, with 1=\"applicable\" and 6=\"not applicable\"; cumulated percentage of answers of 1 or 2 in parentheses): 1. Conscious handling of strengths and weaknesses of oral examinations (71%), 2. Knowledge of factors contributing to the reliability of oral/practical examinations (76%), 3. Knowledge of factors contributing to the validity of oral/practical examinations (75%), 4. Improvement of competence in task construction (68%), 5. Improvement of competence in respect to examination formalities (75%), 6. Implementation of the concept of \"structured oral examinations\" (a priori planning of examination subjects, tasks, levels of expectation and grading criteria) (86%). The responses of participants trained more than two years ago were not significantly different from the answers given by recently trained persons. This is an argument for the sustainability of the training effects. Furthermore, participants without relevant prior experience in oral/practical examinations profited significantly more from the trainings, especially in the areas of stress reduction, confidence in grading, and competence in critical discrimination of grading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive and sustained effects of the examiner training argue for continuing the training program, especially for inexperienced examiners. Expansion of the successful training program to include the first medical exam should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":30054,"journal":{"name":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","volume":"30 3","pages":"Doc36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000879","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects and sustainability of trainings for the oral and practical part of the German final exam in medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Wolfgang Öchsner,&nbsp;Sandra Geiler,&nbsp;Markus Huber-Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/zma000879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study goals: </strong>It is known that the manifold limitations of oral and practical examinations can be improved by specific training. With the help of an online survey, our present study analyzes the effects that can be achieved by the training conducted at the University of Ulm for examiners in the final medical examination, the long-lasting impact of the training, and differences among participant subgroups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All 367 participants in the training at Ulm (2007- 2012) were contacted via email. Sixty-three persons responded to the survey that included 28 items concerning demographic data, effectiveness, and sustainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main effects of the training were identified (meaning effects rated with a grade of 1 or 2 on a 6-point scale by two thirds of the participants, with 1=\\\"applicable\\\" and 6=\\\"not applicable\\\"; cumulated percentage of answers of 1 or 2 in parentheses): 1. Conscious handling of strengths and weaknesses of oral examinations (71%), 2. Knowledge of factors contributing to the reliability of oral/practical examinations (76%), 3. Knowledge of factors contributing to the validity of oral/practical examinations (75%), 4. Improvement of competence in task construction (68%), 5. Improvement of competence in respect to examination formalities (75%), 6. Implementation of the concept of \\\"structured oral examinations\\\" (a priori planning of examination subjects, tasks, levels of expectation and grading criteria) (86%). The responses of participants trained more than two years ago were not significantly different from the answers given by recently trained persons. This is an argument for the sustainability of the training effects. Furthermore, participants without relevant prior experience in oral/practical examinations profited significantly more from the trainings, especially in the areas of stress reduction, confidence in grading, and competence in critical discrimination of grading.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The positive and sustained effects of the examiner training argue for continuing the training program, especially for inexperienced examiners. Expansion of the successful training program to include the first medical exam should be considered.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"Doc36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3205/zma000879\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Ausbildung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究目标:众所周知,口语和实践考试的种种局限性可以通过特定的训练得到改善。通过在线调查,本研究分析了在乌尔姆大学对审查员进行的期末体检培训所能达到的效果、培训的长期影响以及参与者亚组之间的差异。方法:通过电子邮件联系2007- 2012年在乌尔姆参加培训的367名参与者。63人答复了调查,其中包括28个关于人口数据、有效性和可持续性的项目。结果:确定了培训的六个主要效果(意思是三分之二的参与者在6分制中以1级或2级评价效果,其中1=“适用”,6=“不适用”;1或2(括号内)的累计百分比:1。1 .有意识地处理口试的优缺点(71%);2 .了解影响口试/实践考试可靠性的因素(76%);3 .了解影响口试/实践考试有效性的因素(75%);4 .任务建构能力的提升(68%);5 .提高考试手续能力(75%);实施“结构化口试”的概念(预先规划考试科目、任务、期望水平和评分标准)(86%)。两年多前接受培训的学员的回答与最近接受培训的学员的回答并无显著差异。这是对培训效果可持续性的论证。此外,没有相关口语/实践考试经验的参与者从培训中获益更多,特别是在减轻压力、对评分的信心和对评分的批判性辨别能力方面。结论:审查员培训的积极和持续效果证明了继续培训计划的必要性,特别是对于没有经验的审查员。应考虑扩大成功的培训计划,使其包括首次体检。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects and sustainability of trainings for the oral and practical part of the German final exam in medicine.

Effects and sustainability of trainings for the oral and practical part of the German final exam in medicine.

Study goals: It is known that the manifold limitations of oral and practical examinations can be improved by specific training. With the help of an online survey, our present study analyzes the effects that can be achieved by the training conducted at the University of Ulm for examiners in the final medical examination, the long-lasting impact of the training, and differences among participant subgroups.

Method: All 367 participants in the training at Ulm (2007- 2012) were contacted via email. Sixty-three persons responded to the survey that included 28 items concerning demographic data, effectiveness, and sustainability.

Results: Six main effects of the training were identified (meaning effects rated with a grade of 1 or 2 on a 6-point scale by two thirds of the participants, with 1="applicable" and 6="not applicable"; cumulated percentage of answers of 1 or 2 in parentheses): 1. Conscious handling of strengths and weaknesses of oral examinations (71%), 2. Knowledge of factors contributing to the reliability of oral/practical examinations (76%), 3. Knowledge of factors contributing to the validity of oral/practical examinations (75%), 4. Improvement of competence in task construction (68%), 5. Improvement of competence in respect to examination formalities (75%), 6. Implementation of the concept of "structured oral examinations" (a priori planning of examination subjects, tasks, levels of expectation and grading criteria) (86%). The responses of participants trained more than two years ago were not significantly different from the answers given by recently trained persons. This is an argument for the sustainability of the training effects. Furthermore, participants without relevant prior experience in oral/practical examinations profited significantly more from the trainings, especially in the areas of stress reduction, confidence in grading, and competence in critical discrimination of grading.

Conclusion: The positive and sustained effects of the examiner training argue for continuing the training program, especially for inexperienced examiners. Expansion of the successful training program to include the first medical exam should be considered.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信