探讨个案管理使用者的陈述和经验:探讨对生活条件复杂的老年人进行定性访谈的困难和解决办法。

Quality in primary care Pub Date : 2013-01-01
Frédéric Balard, Stéphanie Pin Le Corre, Hélène Trouvé, Olivier Saint-Jean, Dominique Somme
{"title":"探讨个案管理使用者的陈述和经验:探讨对生活条件复杂的老年人进行定性访谈的困难和解决办法。","authors":"Frédéric Balard,&nbsp;Stéphanie Pin Le Corre,&nbsp;Hélène Trouvé,&nbsp;Olivier Saint-Jean,&nbsp;Dominique Somme","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>By matching needs to resource services, case management could be a useful tool for improving the care of older people with complex living conditions. Collecting and analysing the users' experiences represents a good way to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a case-management service. However, in the literature, fieldwork is very rarely considered and the users included in qualitative research seem to be the most accessible.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was undertaken to describe the challenges of conducting qualitative research with older people with complex living conditions in order to understand their experiences with case-management services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reflective analysis was applied to describe the process of recruiting and interviewing older people with complex living conditions in private homes, describing the protocol with respect to fieldwork chronology. The practical difficulties inherent in this type of study are addressed, particularly in terms of defining a sample, the procedure for contacting the users and conducting the interview. The users are people who suffer from a loss of autonomy because of cognitive impairment, severe disease and/or psychiatric or social problems. Notably, most of them refuse care and assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reflective analysis of our protocol showed that the methodology and difficulties encountered constituted the first phase of data analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the experience of users of case management to analyse the outcomes of case-management services requires a clear methodology for the fieldwork.</p>","PeriodicalId":88096,"journal":{"name":"Quality in primary care","volume":"21 4","pages":"229-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring representations and experiences of case-management users: towards difficulties and solutions to leading qualitative interviews with older people with complex living conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Frédéric Balard,&nbsp;Stéphanie Pin Le Corre,&nbsp;Hélène Trouvé,&nbsp;Olivier Saint-Jean,&nbsp;Dominique Somme\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>By matching needs to resource services, case management could be a useful tool for improving the care of older people with complex living conditions. Collecting and analysing the users' experiences represents a good way to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a case-management service. However, in the literature, fieldwork is very rarely considered and the users included in qualitative research seem to be the most accessible.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study was undertaken to describe the challenges of conducting qualitative research with older people with complex living conditions in order to understand their experiences with case-management services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reflective analysis was applied to describe the process of recruiting and interviewing older people with complex living conditions in private homes, describing the protocol with respect to fieldwork chronology. The practical difficulties inherent in this type of study are addressed, particularly in terms of defining a sample, the procedure for contacting the users and conducting the interview. The users are people who suffer from a loss of autonomy because of cognitive impairment, severe disease and/or psychiatric or social problems. Notably, most of them refuse care and assistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reflective analysis of our protocol showed that the methodology and difficulties encountered constituted the first phase of data analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the experience of users of case management to analyse the outcomes of case-management services requires a clear methodology for the fieldwork.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"volume\":\"21 4\",\"pages\":\"229-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过将需求与资源服务相匹配,病例管理可以成为改善生活条件复杂的老年人护理的有用工具。收集和分析用户的经验是评估案件管理服务的有效性和效率的好方法。然而,在文献中,很少考虑实地工作,定性研究中包含的用户似乎是最容易获得的。目的:本研究旨在描述对生活条件复杂的老年人进行定性研究的挑战,以了解他们在病例管理服务方面的经验。方法:采用反思性分析来描述在私人住宅中招募和访谈具有复杂生活条件的老年人的过程,描述与实地调查年表相关的协议。讨论了这类研究中固有的实际困难,特别是在确定样本、联系用户和进行访谈的程序方面。使用者是由于认知障碍、严重疾病和/或精神或社会问题而丧失自主能力的人。值得注意的是,他们中的大多数人拒绝照顾和帮助。结果:对我们方案的反思分析表明,方法和遇到的困难构成了数据分析的第一阶段。结论:了解病例管理用户的经验,以分析病例管理服务的结果,需要一个明确的实地工作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring representations and experiences of case-management users: towards difficulties and solutions to leading qualitative interviews with older people with complex living conditions.

Background: By matching needs to resource services, case management could be a useful tool for improving the care of older people with complex living conditions. Collecting and analysing the users' experiences represents a good way to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of a case-management service. However, in the literature, fieldwork is very rarely considered and the users included in qualitative research seem to be the most accessible.

Aim: This study was undertaken to describe the challenges of conducting qualitative research with older people with complex living conditions in order to understand their experiences with case-management services.

Methods: Reflective analysis was applied to describe the process of recruiting and interviewing older people with complex living conditions in private homes, describing the protocol with respect to fieldwork chronology. The practical difficulties inherent in this type of study are addressed, particularly in terms of defining a sample, the procedure for contacting the users and conducting the interview. The users are people who suffer from a loss of autonomy because of cognitive impairment, severe disease and/or psychiatric or social problems. Notably, most of them refuse care and assistance.

Results: Reflective analysis of our protocol showed that the methodology and difficulties encountered constituted the first phase of data analysis.

Conclusion: Understanding the experience of users of case management to analyse the outcomes of case-management services requires a clear methodology for the fieldwork.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信