培养临床推理教师。

Gurpreet Dhaliwal
{"title":"培养临床推理教师。","authors":"Gurpreet Dhaliwal","doi":"10.1111/tct.12082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Front-line teachers seek guidance and tools to instruct and remediate clinical reasoning, but effective professional development methods to accomplish these goals have not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2-hour workshop was developed to empower front-line clinician educators to teach and remediate clinical reasoning by understanding the cognitive steps in the clinical reasoning process which can be leveraged in clinical settings. The workshop has been given 19 times over 6 years and uses interactive didactic presentations, facilitated discussion and dyad exercises, followed by small group analysis of trainee cases, where the diagnosis and remediation of clinical reasoning issues are practised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality and organisation of the session and the participants' intentions to change their teaching practice were rated higher than faculty development seminars in the same academic years. Participants cited the four-step model, technology analogies and the opportunity to analyse cases with peers as highly effective elements of the workshop.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Similarly structured faculty development seminars may help bring insights from clinical reasoning theory to bedside and classroom instruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":74987,"journal":{"name":"The clinical teacher","volume":"10 5","pages":"313-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12082","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing teachers of clinical reasoning.\",\"authors\":\"Gurpreet Dhaliwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.12082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Front-line teachers seek guidance and tools to instruct and remediate clinical reasoning, but effective professional development methods to accomplish these goals have not been reported.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 2-hour workshop was developed to empower front-line clinician educators to teach and remediate clinical reasoning by understanding the cognitive steps in the clinical reasoning process which can be leveraged in clinical settings. The workshop has been given 19 times over 6 years and uses interactive didactic presentations, facilitated discussion and dyad exercises, followed by small group analysis of trainee cases, where the diagnosis and remediation of clinical reasoning issues are practised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quality and organisation of the session and the participants' intentions to change their teaching practice were rated higher than faculty development seminars in the same academic years. Participants cited the four-step model, technology analogies and the opportunity to analyse cases with peers as highly effective elements of the workshop.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Similarly structured faculty development seminars may help bring insights from clinical reasoning theory to bedside and classroom instruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"313-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/tct.12082\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The clinical teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12082\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The clinical teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

背景:一线教师寻求指导和纠正临床推理的指导和工具,但实现这些目标的有效专业发展方法尚未见报道。方法:开发了一个2小时的研讨会,通过了解临床推理过程中的认知步骤,使一线临床医生教育工作者能够教授和纠正临床推理,这些步骤可以在临床环境中加以利用。该讲习班在6年里举办了19次,采用互动式教学介绍、促进讨论和双组练习,然后对实习病例进行小组分析,在小组分析中进行临床推理问题的诊断和补救。结果:会议的质量和组织以及参与者改变教学实践的意图被评为高于同一学年的教师发展研讨会。与会者指出,四步模式、技术类比和与同行分析案例的机会是讲习班的高效要素。讨论:类似结构的教师发展研讨会可能有助于将临床推理理论的见解带到床边和课堂教学中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing teachers of clinical reasoning.

Background: Front-line teachers seek guidance and tools to instruct and remediate clinical reasoning, but effective professional development methods to accomplish these goals have not been reported.

Methods: A 2-hour workshop was developed to empower front-line clinician educators to teach and remediate clinical reasoning by understanding the cognitive steps in the clinical reasoning process which can be leveraged in clinical settings. The workshop has been given 19 times over 6 years and uses interactive didactic presentations, facilitated discussion and dyad exercises, followed by small group analysis of trainee cases, where the diagnosis and remediation of clinical reasoning issues are practised.

Results: The quality and organisation of the session and the participants' intentions to change their teaching practice were rated higher than faculty development seminars in the same academic years. Participants cited the four-step model, technology analogies and the opportunity to analyse cases with peers as highly effective elements of the workshop.

Discussion: Similarly structured faculty development seminars may help bring insights from clinical reasoning theory to bedside and classroom instruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信