asfa后美国国会听证会简介。

IF 0.8 4区社会学 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES

Child Welfare Pub Date : 2013-01-01

Heather Edwards

{"title":"asfa后美国国会听证会简介。","authors":"Heather Edwards","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Examination of the policymaking process can yield a better understanding of the rationale behind policy content and prescriptions for shaping future policies. To this end, this study uses data from 38 child welfare hearings held by the U.S. Congress from 1999-2010 to describe key hearings, as well as Congress, committee member, and child welfare indicators. This manuscript concludes with implications for research and practice.","PeriodicalId":9796,"journal":{"name":"Child Welfare","volume":"92 1","pages":"65-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A profile of post-ASFA hearings in the U.S. Congress.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Edwards\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Examination of the policymaking process can yield a better understanding of the rationale behind policy content and prescriptions for shaping future policies. To this end, this study uses data from 38 child welfare hearings held by the U.S. Congress from 1999-2010 to describe key hearings, as well as Congress, committee member, and child welfare indicators. This manuscript concludes with implications for research and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Child Welfare\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"65-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Child Welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Welfare","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

审查政策制定过程可以更好地理解政策内容背后的基本原理和制定未来政策的处方。为此，本研究使用1999-2010年美国国会举行的38场儿童福利听证会的数据来描述关键听证会，以及国会、委员会成员和儿童福利指标。本文总结了对研究和实践的启示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

A profile of post-ASFA hearings in the U.S. Congress.

Examination of the policymaking process can yield a better understanding of the rationale behind policy content and prescriptions for shaping future policies. To this end, this study uses data from 38 child welfare hearings held by the U.S. Congress from 1999-2010 to describe key hearings, as well as Congress, committee member, and child welfare indicators. This manuscript concludes with implications for research and practice.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Child Welfare Multiple-

自引率

14.30%

发文量