腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术术后腹内脓肿的处理。

Osaka city medical journal Pub Date : 2013-06-01
Shogo Tanaka, Kanji Ishihara, Takahiro Uenishi, Ryoya Hashiba, Yukiko Kurashima, Kohichi Ohno, Sayaka Tanaka, Masahiko Ohsawa, Takatsugu Yamamoto
{"title":"腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术术后腹内脓肿的处理。","authors":"Shogo Tanaka,&nbsp;Kanji Ishihara,&nbsp;Takahiro Uenishi,&nbsp;Ryoya Hashiba,&nbsp;Yukiko Kurashima,&nbsp;Kohichi Ohno,&nbsp;Sayaka Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahiko Ohsawa,&nbsp;Takatsugu Yamamoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or perforated appendicitis) is a risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscess, but management of intraabdominal abscess may differ between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 67 patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, including 26 who received laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group) and 41 who underwent open appendectomy (OA group). The operation was performed under general anesthesia in all 26 patients in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group. Patient characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative complications (especially postoperative intraabdominal abscess) were compared between the two groups. Management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess was also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative intraabdominal abscess occurred in 3 patients (12%) in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group (p = 0.23). All 3 patients in the LA group were treated conservatively. Of the 10 patients in the OA group, 6 were treated conservatively, but 4 needed a reoperation, including 3 who had undergone right pararectal skin incision under spinal analgesia and in whom sufficient irrigation was not possible because anesthesia had worn off.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that insertion of abdominal drainage may be appropriate treatment for intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy. Light anesthesia may induce residual abscess in open appendectomy performed under spinal analgesia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19613,"journal":{"name":"Osaka city medical journal","volume":"59 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess in laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Shogo Tanaka,&nbsp;Kanji Ishihara,&nbsp;Takahiro Uenishi,&nbsp;Ryoya Hashiba,&nbsp;Yukiko Kurashima,&nbsp;Kohichi Ohno,&nbsp;Sayaka Tanaka,&nbsp;Masahiko Ohsawa,&nbsp;Takatsugu Yamamoto\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or perforated appendicitis) is a risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscess, but management of intraabdominal abscess may differ between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 67 patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, including 26 who received laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group) and 41 who underwent open appendectomy (OA group). The operation was performed under general anesthesia in all 26 patients in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group. Patient characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative complications (especially postoperative intraabdominal abscess) were compared between the two groups. Management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess was also investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative intraabdominal abscess occurred in 3 patients (12%) in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group (p = 0.23). All 3 patients in the LA group were treated conservatively. Of the 10 patients in the OA group, 6 were treated conservatively, but 4 needed a reoperation, including 3 who had undergone right pararectal skin incision under spinal analgesia and in whom sufficient irrigation was not possible because anesthesia had worn off.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that insertion of abdominal drainage may be appropriate treatment for intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy. Light anesthesia may induce residual abscess in open appendectomy performed under spinal analgesia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osaka city medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osaka city medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复杂性阑尾炎(坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎)是术后腹内脓肿的危险因素,但腹腔镜和开放式阑尾切除术对腹内脓肿的处理可能不同。方法:回顾性分析67例因复杂性阑尾炎行阑尾切除术的患者,其中腹腔镜阑尾切除术26例(LA组),开放式阑尾切除术41例(OA组)。LA组26例患者全麻下手术,OA组10例(24%)全麻下手术。比较两组患者特征、手术因素及术后并发症(尤其是术后腹内脓肿)。对术后腹内脓肿的处理也进行了探讨。结果:LA组术后出现腹腔内脓肿3例(12%),OA组术后出现腹腔内脓肿10例(24%)(p = 0.23)。LA组3例患者均采用保守治疗。OA组10例患者中,6例采用保守治疗,4例需要再次手术,其中3例在脊髓镇痛下行右侧直肠旁皮肤切口,因麻醉消退而无法充分冲洗。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术后腹腔脓肿置入腹腔引流管可能是一种合适的治疗方法。脊髓镇痛下行开放性阑尾切除术,轻麻醉可诱发残余脓肿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess in laparoscopic versus open appendectomy.

Background: Complicated appendicitis (gangrenous or perforated appendicitis) is a risk for postoperative intraabdominal abscess, but management of intraabdominal abscess may differ between laparoscopic and open appendectomy.

Methods: We reviewed 67 patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis, including 26 who received laparoscopic appendectomy (LA group) and 41 who underwent open appendectomy (OA group). The operation was performed under general anesthesia in all 26 patients in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group. Patient characteristics, operative factors, and postoperative complications (especially postoperative intraabdominal abscess) were compared between the two groups. Management of postoperative intraabdominal abscess was also investigated.

Results: Postoperative intraabdominal abscess occurred in 3 patients (12%) in the LA group and in 10 (24%) in the OA group (p = 0.23). All 3 patients in the LA group were treated conservatively. Of the 10 patients in the OA group, 6 were treated conservatively, but 4 needed a reoperation, including 3 who had undergone right pararectal skin incision under spinal analgesia and in whom sufficient irrigation was not possible because anesthesia had worn off.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that insertion of abdominal drainage may be appropriate treatment for intraabdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy. Light anesthesia may induce residual abscess in open appendectomy performed under spinal analgesia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信