顺其自然。

Health devices Pub Date : 2013-06-01
{"title":"顺其自然。","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter is considered the gold standard in measuring cardiac output. however, drawbacks associated with the technique have prompted clinicians to seek less invasive options. but these alternatives have their own limitations. we examine the evidence on four devices that measure cardiac output using minimally invasive and noninvasive techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":77154,"journal":{"name":"Health devices","volume":"42 6","pages":"178-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Go with the flow.\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter is considered the gold standard in measuring cardiac output. however, drawbacks associated with the technique have prompted clinicians to seek less invasive options. but these alternatives have their own limitations. we examine the evidence on four devices that measure cardiac output using minimally invasive and noninvasive techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health devices\",\"volume\":\"42 6\",\"pages\":\"178-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用肺动脉导管进行热稀释被认为是测量心输出量的金标准。然而,与该技术相关的缺点促使临床医生寻求侵入性较小的选择。但这些替代方案有其自身的局限性。我们检查了使用微创和无创技术测量心输出量的四种设备的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Go with the flow.

Thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter is considered the gold standard in measuring cardiac output. however, drawbacks associated with the technique have prompted clinicians to seek less invasive options. but these alternatives have their own limitations. we examine the evidence on four devices that measure cardiac output using minimally invasive and noninvasive techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信