家族性腺瘤性息肉病预防性手术后的腺癌。

Joan C Smith, Michael W Schäffer, Billy R Ballard, Duane T Smoot, Alan J Herline, Samuel E Adunyah, Amosy E M'Koma
{"title":"家族性腺瘤性息肉病预防性手术后的腺癌。","authors":"Joan C Smith,&nbsp;Michael W Schäffer,&nbsp;Billy R Ballard,&nbsp;Duane T Smoot,&nbsp;Alan J Herline,&nbsp;Samuel E Adunyah,&nbsp;Amosy E M'Koma","doi":"10.4236/jct.2013.41033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The incidence of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is one in 7,000 to 12,000 live births. Virtually, all surgically untreated patients with FAP inevitably develop colorectal-cancer in their lifetime because they carry the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Thus prophylactic proctocolectomy is indicated. Surgical treatment of FAP is still controversial. There are however, four surgical options: ileorectal anastomosis, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, proctocolectomy with ileostomy, and proctocolectomy with continent-ileostomy. Conventional proctocolectomy options largely lie between colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Detractors of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis prefer ileorectal anastomosis because of better functional results and quality of life. The functional outcome of total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is undoubtedly far superior to that of the ileoanal pouch; however, the risk for rectal cancer is increased by 30%. Even after mucosectomy, inadvertent small mucosal residual islands remain. These residual islands carry the potential for the development of subsequent malignancy. We reviewed the literature (1975-2012) on the incidence, nature, and possible etiology of subsequent ileal-pouch and anal transit zone adenocarcinoma after prophylactic surgery procedure for FAP. To date there are 24 studies reporting 92 pouch-related cancers; 15 case reports, 4 prospective and 5 retrospective studies. Twenty three of 92 cancers (25%) developed in the pouch mucosa and 69 (75%) in anal transit zone (ATZ). Current recommendation for pouch surveillance and treatment are presented. Data suggest lifetime surveillance of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15267,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Therapy","volume":"4 1","pages":"260-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713706/pdf/nihms474394.pdf","citationCount":"44","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adenocarcinomas After Prophylactic Surgery For Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.\",\"authors\":\"Joan C Smith,&nbsp;Michael W Schäffer,&nbsp;Billy R Ballard,&nbsp;Duane T Smoot,&nbsp;Alan J Herline,&nbsp;Samuel E Adunyah,&nbsp;Amosy E M'Koma\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jct.2013.41033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The incidence of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is one in 7,000 to 12,000 live births. Virtually, all surgically untreated patients with FAP inevitably develop colorectal-cancer in their lifetime because they carry the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Thus prophylactic proctocolectomy is indicated. Surgical treatment of FAP is still controversial. There are however, four surgical options: ileorectal anastomosis, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, proctocolectomy with ileostomy, and proctocolectomy with continent-ileostomy. Conventional proctocolectomy options largely lie between colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Detractors of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis prefer ileorectal anastomosis because of better functional results and quality of life. The functional outcome of total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is undoubtedly far superior to that of the ileoanal pouch; however, the risk for rectal cancer is increased by 30%. Even after mucosectomy, inadvertent small mucosal residual islands remain. These residual islands carry the potential for the development of subsequent malignancy. We reviewed the literature (1975-2012) on the incidence, nature, and possible etiology of subsequent ileal-pouch and anal transit zone adenocarcinoma after prophylactic surgery procedure for FAP. To date there are 24 studies reporting 92 pouch-related cancers; 15 case reports, 4 prospective and 5 retrospective studies. Twenty three of 92 cancers (25%) developed in the pouch mucosa and 69 (75%) in anal transit zone (ATZ). Current recommendation for pouch surveillance and treatment are presented. Data suggest lifetime surveillance of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Therapy\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"260-270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3713706/pdf/nihms474394.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"44\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2013.41033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jct.2013.41033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 44

摘要

家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)的发病率为每7,000至12,000名活产婴儿中有一人。事实上,所有未经手术治疗的FAP患者在其一生中不可避免地发展为结直肠癌,因为他们携带大肠腺瘤性息肉病基因。因此建议预防性直结肠切除术。FAP的手术治疗仍有争议。然而,有四种手术选择:回直肠吻合术,回肠袋-肛门吻合术的恢复性直结肠切除术,回肠造口术的直结肠切除术和回肠大陆造口术的直结肠切除术。传统的直结肠切除术选择主要是结肠切除术加回直肠吻合术或回肠袋-肛门吻合术。对回肠袋肛吻合术持批评态度的人更倾向于回肠直肠吻合术,因为前者具有更好的功能效果和生活质量。全结肠切除术并回肠吻合术的功能效果无疑远优于回肠袋切除术;然而,患直肠癌的风险增加了30%。即使在粘膜切除术后,无意中残留的小粘膜岛仍然存在。这些残留的岛屿具有发展为后续恶性肿瘤的潜力。我们回顾了1975-2012年关于FAP预防性手术后继发回肠袋和肛门中转区腺癌的发生率、性质和可能病因的文献。迄今为止,有24项研究报告了92种与眼袋有关的癌症;15例病例报告,4项前瞻性研究和5项回顾性研究。92例癌症中有23例(25%)发生在小袋粘膜,69例(75%)发生在肛门运输区(ATZ)。目前的建议眼袋监测和治疗提出。数据建议对这些患者进行终生监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adenocarcinomas After Prophylactic Surgery For Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

The incidence of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is one in 7,000 to 12,000 live births. Virtually, all surgically untreated patients with FAP inevitably develop colorectal-cancer in their lifetime because they carry the adenomatous polyposis coli gene. Thus prophylactic proctocolectomy is indicated. Surgical treatment of FAP is still controversial. There are however, four surgical options: ileorectal anastomosis, restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, proctocolectomy with ileostomy, and proctocolectomy with continent-ileostomy. Conventional proctocolectomy options largely lie between colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Detractors of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis prefer ileorectal anastomosis because of better functional results and quality of life. The functional outcome of total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis is undoubtedly far superior to that of the ileoanal pouch; however, the risk for rectal cancer is increased by 30%. Even after mucosectomy, inadvertent small mucosal residual islands remain. These residual islands carry the potential for the development of subsequent malignancy. We reviewed the literature (1975-2012) on the incidence, nature, and possible etiology of subsequent ileal-pouch and anal transit zone adenocarcinoma after prophylactic surgery procedure for FAP. To date there are 24 studies reporting 92 pouch-related cancers; 15 case reports, 4 prospective and 5 retrospective studies. Twenty three of 92 cancers (25%) developed in the pouch mucosa and 69 (75%) in anal transit zone (ATZ). Current recommendation for pouch surveillance and treatment are presented. Data suggest lifetime surveillance of these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信