Jay Stoerker, Thomas G Goodman, Heather M Walline, Jeffrey Sugalski, Carol A Holland
{"title":"对11,000个样本后151个突变和变异CFTR筛选小组的BeadXpress检测的评估:实践意义","authors":"Jay Stoerker, Thomas G Goodman, Heather M Walline, Jeffrey Sugalski, Carol A Holland","doi":"10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We created a 151-mutation and variant screening panel for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) using the Illumina Inc. BeadXpress platform (San Diego, CA). The laboratory developed test was validated using a third-party blinding of a set of 450 samples split with an authority laboratory that provides a large panel CFTR screening and 50 diverse controls admixed randomly. The validation proved the test to be 100% sensitive for the mutations tested and >99% specific. A total of 391 mutations in 11,186 samples tested were confirmed by repeat analysis and sequencing, resulting in an overall confirmed positive rate of 3.5%. Of the mutations detected, 348 were part of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) panel (89%) and 43 were non-ACOG (11%). A total of 16 of the 23 ACOG panel mutations were discovered in this cohort, along with 21 different non-ACOG mutation genotypes. We confirmed 6 total patients carrying mutations that would not have been identified by any other commercial panel. The role of a large genotyping panel in carrier screening is discussed relative to the ACOG panel and also in relation to comparative efficacy with targeted massive parallel sequencing. </p>","PeriodicalId":11235,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","volume":"22 3","pages":"144-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of a BeadXpress assay for a 151-mutation and variant CFTR screening panel after 11,000 samples: implications for practice.\",\"authors\":\"Jay Stoerker, Thomas G Goodman, Heather M Walline, Jeffrey Sugalski, Carol A Holland\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We created a 151-mutation and variant screening panel for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) using the Illumina Inc. BeadXpress platform (San Diego, CA). The laboratory developed test was validated using a third-party blinding of a set of 450 samples split with an authority laboratory that provides a large panel CFTR screening and 50 diverse controls admixed randomly. The validation proved the test to be 100% sensitive for the mutations tested and >99% specific. A total of 391 mutations in 11,186 samples tested were confirmed by repeat analysis and sequencing, resulting in an overall confirmed positive rate of 3.5%. Of the mutations detected, 348 were part of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) panel (89%) and 43 were non-ACOG (11%). A total of 16 of the 23 ACOG panel mutations were discovered in this cohort, along with 21 different non-ACOG mutation genotypes. We confirmed 6 total patients carrying mutations that would not have been identified by any other commercial panel. The role of a large genotyping panel in carrier screening is discussed relative to the ACOG panel and also in relation to comparative efficacy with targeted massive parallel sequencing. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"144-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Molecular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PDM.0b013e318286b4c0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of a BeadXpress assay for a 151-mutation and variant CFTR screening panel after 11,000 samples: implications for practice.
We created a 151-mutation and variant screening panel for cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) using the Illumina Inc. BeadXpress platform (San Diego, CA). The laboratory developed test was validated using a third-party blinding of a set of 450 samples split with an authority laboratory that provides a large panel CFTR screening and 50 diverse controls admixed randomly. The validation proved the test to be 100% sensitive for the mutations tested and >99% specific. A total of 391 mutations in 11,186 samples tested were confirmed by repeat analysis and sequencing, resulting in an overall confirmed positive rate of 3.5%. Of the mutations detected, 348 were part of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG) panel (89%) and 43 were non-ACOG (11%). A total of 16 of the 23 ACOG panel mutations were discovered in this cohort, along with 21 different non-ACOG mutation genotypes. We confirmed 6 total patients carrying mutations that would not have been identified by any other commercial panel. The role of a large genotyping panel in carrier screening is discussed relative to the ACOG panel and also in relation to comparative efficacy with targeted massive parallel sequencing.
期刊介绍:
Diagnostic Molecular Pathology focuses on providing clinical and academic pathologists with coverage of the latest molecular technologies, timely reviews of established techniques, and papers on the applications of these methods to all aspects of surgical pathology and laboratory medicine. It publishes original, peer-reviewed contributions on molecular probes for diagnosis, such as tumor suppressor genes, oncogenes, the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and in situ hybridization. Articles demonstrate how these highly sensitive techniques can be applied for more accurate diagnosis.