与羊奶相比,骆驼奶是喂养牛奶过敏儿童更安全的选择。

ISRN allergy Pub Date : 2011-06-29 Print Date: 2011-01-01 DOI:10.5402/2011/391641
Mohammad Ehlayel, Abdulbari Bener, Khalid Abu Hazeima, Fatima Al-Mesaifri
{"title":"与羊奶相比,骆驼奶是喂养牛奶过敏儿童更安全的选择。","authors":"Mohammad Ehlayel, Abdulbari Bener, Khalid Abu Hazeima, Fatima Al-Mesaifri","doi":"10.5402/2011/391641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Various sources of mammalian milk have been tried in CMA. Objectives. To determine whether camel milk is safer than goat milk in CMA. Methods. Prospective study conducted at Hamad Medical Corporation between April 2007 and April 2010, on children with CMA. Each child had medical examination, CBC, total IgE, cow milk-specific IgE and SPT. CMA children were tested against fresh camel and goat milks. Results. Of 38 children (median age 21.5 months), 21 (55.3%) presented with urticaria, 17 (39.5%) atopic dermatitis, 10 (26.3%) anaphylaxis. WBC was 10, 039 ± 4, 735 cells/μL, eosinophil 1, 143 ± 2, 213 cells/μL, IgE 694 ± 921 IU/mL, cow's milk-specific-IgE 23.5 ± 35.6 KU/L. Only 7 children (18.4%) tested positive to camel milk and 24 (63.2%) to goat milk. 6 (15.8%) were positive to camel, goat, and cow milks. Patients with negative SPT tolerated well camel and goat milks. Conclusions. In CMA, SPT indicates low cross-reactivity between camel milk and cow milk, and camel milk is a safer alternative than goat milk.</p>","PeriodicalId":89782,"journal":{"name":"ISRN allergy","volume":"2011 ","pages":"391641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Camel milk is a safer choice than goat milk for feeding children with cow milk allergy.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ehlayel, Abdulbari Bener, Khalid Abu Hazeima, Fatima Al-Mesaifri\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2011/391641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Various sources of mammalian milk have been tried in CMA. Objectives. To determine whether camel milk is safer than goat milk in CMA. Methods. Prospective study conducted at Hamad Medical Corporation between April 2007 and April 2010, on children with CMA. Each child had medical examination, CBC, total IgE, cow milk-specific IgE and SPT. CMA children were tested against fresh camel and goat milks. Results. Of 38 children (median age 21.5 months), 21 (55.3%) presented with urticaria, 17 (39.5%) atopic dermatitis, 10 (26.3%) anaphylaxis. WBC was 10, 039 ± 4, 735 cells/μL, eosinophil 1, 143 ± 2, 213 cells/μL, IgE 694 ± 921 IU/mL, cow's milk-specific-IgE 23.5 ± 35.6 KU/L. Only 7 children (18.4%) tested positive to camel milk and 24 (63.2%) to goat milk. 6 (15.8%) were positive to camel, goat, and cow milks. Patients with negative SPT tolerated well camel and goat milks. Conclusions. In CMA, SPT indicates low cross-reactivity between camel milk and cow milk, and camel milk is a safer alternative than goat milk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN allergy\",\"volume\":\"2011 \",\"pages\":\"391641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3658853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/391641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2011/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/391641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2011/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。CMA 尝试了多种哺乳动物乳汁来源。目标。确定在 CMA 中骆驼奶是否比山羊奶更安全。方法。2007 年 4 月至 2010 年 4 月期间,在哈马德医疗公司对患有 CMA 的儿童进行了前瞻性研究。每个患儿都进行了体检、全血细胞计数、总 IgE、牛奶特异性 IgE 和 SPT 检测。对患有 CMA 的儿童进行了新鲜骆驼奶和山羊奶测试。结果。38名儿童(中位年龄为21.5个月)中,21名(55.3%)患有荨麻疹,17名(39.5%)患有特应性皮炎,10名(26.3%)患有过敏性休克。白细胞为 10 039 ± 4 735 cells/μL,嗜酸性粒细胞为 1 143 ± 2 213 cells/μL,IgE 为 694 ± 921 IU/mL,牛奶特异性 IgE 为 23.5 ± 35.6 KU/L。只有 7 名儿童(18.4%)对骆驼奶检测呈阳性,24 名儿童(63.2%)对山羊奶检测呈阳性。6名儿童(15.8%)对骆驼奶、山羊奶和牛奶均呈阳性。SPT 阴性的患者能很好地耐受骆驼奶和山羊奶。结论在 CMA 中,SPT 显示骆驼奶和牛奶之间的交叉反应较低,骆驼奶是比山羊奶更安全的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Camel milk is a safer choice than goat milk for feeding children with cow milk allergy.

Camel milk is a safer choice than goat milk for feeding children with cow milk allergy.

Background. Various sources of mammalian milk have been tried in CMA. Objectives. To determine whether camel milk is safer than goat milk in CMA. Methods. Prospective study conducted at Hamad Medical Corporation between April 2007 and April 2010, on children with CMA. Each child had medical examination, CBC, total IgE, cow milk-specific IgE and SPT. CMA children were tested against fresh camel and goat milks. Results. Of 38 children (median age 21.5 months), 21 (55.3%) presented with urticaria, 17 (39.5%) atopic dermatitis, 10 (26.3%) anaphylaxis. WBC was 10, 039 ± 4, 735 cells/μL, eosinophil 1, 143 ± 2, 213 cells/μL, IgE 694 ± 921 IU/mL, cow's milk-specific-IgE 23.5 ± 35.6 KU/L. Only 7 children (18.4%) tested positive to camel milk and 24 (63.2%) to goat milk. 6 (15.8%) were positive to camel, goat, and cow milks. Patients with negative SPT tolerated well camel and goat milks. Conclusions. In CMA, SPT indicates low cross-reactivity between camel milk and cow milk, and camel milk is a safer alternative than goat milk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信