加拿大核心和高级成人胃肠道内窥镜检查培训的现状:现有认证项目的调查。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Xin Xiong, Alan N Barkun, Kevin Waschke, Myriam Martel
{"title":"加拿大核心和高级成人胃肠道内窥镜检查培训的现状:现有认证项目的调查。","authors":"Xin Xiong,&nbsp;Alan N Barkun,&nbsp;Kevin Waschke,&nbsp;Myriam Martel","doi":"10.1155/2013/186284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the current status of core and advanced adult gastroenterology training in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey consisting of 20 questions pertaining to core and advanced endoscopy training was circulated to 14 accredited adult gastroenterology residency program directors. For continuous variables, median and range were analyzed; for categorical variables, percentage and associated 95% CIs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 14 programs responded to the survey. The median number of core trainees was six (range four to 16). The median (range) procedural volumes for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively, were 400 (150 to 1000), 325 (200 to 1500), 15 (zero to 250) and 60 (25 to 300). Eleven of 13 (84.6%) programs used endoscopy simulators in their curriculum. Eight of 14 programs (57%) provided a structured advanced endoscopy training fellowship. The majority (88%) offered training of combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The median number of positions offered yearly for advanced endoscopy fellowship was one (range one to three). The median (range) procedural volumes for ERCP, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection, respectively, were 325 (200 to 750), 250 (80 to 400) and 20 (10 to 63). None of the current programs offered training in endoscopic submucosal dissection or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most accredited adult Canadian gastroenterology programs met the minimal procedural requirements recommended by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology during core training. However, a more heterogeneous experience has been observed for advanced training. Additional studies would be required to validate and standardize evaluation tools used during gastroenterology curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":55285,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":"27 5","pages":"267-72"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/186284","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current status of core and advanced adult gastrointestinal endoscopy training in Canada: Survey of existing accredited programs.\",\"authors\":\"Xin Xiong,&nbsp;Alan N Barkun,&nbsp;Kevin Waschke,&nbsp;Myriam Martel\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/186284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the current status of core and advanced adult gastroenterology training in Canada.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey consisting of 20 questions pertaining to core and advanced endoscopy training was circulated to 14 accredited adult gastroenterology residency program directors. For continuous variables, median and range were analyzed; for categorical variables, percentage and associated 95% CIs were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 14 programs responded to the survey. The median number of core trainees was six (range four to 16). The median (range) procedural volumes for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively, were 400 (150 to 1000), 325 (200 to 1500), 15 (zero to 250) and 60 (25 to 300). Eleven of 13 (84.6%) programs used endoscopy simulators in their curriculum. Eight of 14 programs (57%) provided a structured advanced endoscopy training fellowship. The majority (88%) offered training of combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The median number of positions offered yearly for advanced endoscopy fellowship was one (range one to three). The median (range) procedural volumes for ERCP, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection, respectively, were 325 (200 to 750), 250 (80 to 400) and 20 (10 to 63). None of the current programs offered training in endoscopic submucosal dissection or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most accredited adult Canadian gastroenterology programs met the minimal procedural requirements recommended by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology during core training. However, a more heterogeneous experience has been observed for advanced training. Additional studies would be required to validate and standardize evaluation tools used during gastroenterology curricula.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"267-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/186284\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/186284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/186284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

目的:了解加拿大成人胃肠病学核心和高级培训的现状。方法:一份包含20个关于核心和高级内窥镜培训问题的调查问卷分发给14名获得认可的成人胃肠病学住院医师项目主任。对于连续变量,分析中位数和极差;对于分类变量,分析百分比和相关的95% ci。结果:所有14个项目都对调查做出了回应。核心受训人员的中位数为6人(范围4至16人)。胃镜、结肠镜、经皮内镜胃造口术和乙状结肠镜的手术体积中位数(范围)分别为400(150 ~ 1000)、325(200 ~ 1500)、15(0 ~ 250)和60(25 ~ 300)。13个项目中有11个(84.6%)在其课程中使用了内窥镜模拟器。14个项目中有8个(57%)提供结构化的高级内窥镜培训奖学金。大多数(88%)提供内窥镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)和内窥镜超声联合检查的培训。每年提供高级内窥镜研究员职位的中位数为1个(范围为1到3个)。ERCP、内镜超声检查和内镜粘膜切除术的中位(范围)手术体积分别为325(200 ~ 750)、250(80 ~ 400)和20(10 ~ 63)。目前没有一个项目提供内窥镜粘膜下剥离或自然孔腔内窥镜手术的培训。结论:大多数认可的加拿大成人胃肠病学项目在核心培训期间满足了加拿大胃肠病学协会推荐的最低程序要求。然而,在高级培训中观察到的经验更不一致。需要进一步的研究来验证和标准化胃肠病学课程中使用的评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current status of core and advanced adult gastrointestinal endoscopy training in Canada: Survey of existing accredited programs.

Objective: To determine the current status of core and advanced adult gastroenterology training in Canada.

Methods: A survey consisting of 20 questions pertaining to core and advanced endoscopy training was circulated to 14 accredited adult gastroenterology residency program directors. For continuous variables, median and range were analyzed; for categorical variables, percentage and associated 95% CIs were analyzed.

Results: All 14 programs responded to the survey. The median number of core trainees was six (range four to 16). The median (range) procedural volumes for gastroscopy, colonoscopy, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and sigmoidoscopy, respectively, were 400 (150 to 1000), 325 (200 to 1500), 15 (zero to 250) and 60 (25 to 300). Eleven of 13 (84.6%) programs used endoscopy simulators in their curriculum. Eight of 14 programs (57%) provided a structured advanced endoscopy training fellowship. The majority (88%) offered training of combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasonography. The median number of positions offered yearly for advanced endoscopy fellowship was one (range one to three). The median (range) procedural volumes for ERCP, endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic mucosal resection, respectively, were 325 (200 to 750), 250 (80 to 400) and 20 (10 to 63). None of the current programs offered training in endoscopic submucosal dissection or natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Conclusion: Most accredited adult Canadian gastroenterology programs met the minimal procedural requirements recommended by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology during core training. However, a more heterogeneous experience has been observed for advanced training. Additional studies would be required to validate and standardize evaluation tools used during gastroenterology curricula.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信