超声内镜引导下细针抽吸正中纵隔肺肿块的诊断率及安全性。

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-05-30 DOI:10.1155/2013/150492
Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel Boixeda-Miquel, Diego Juzgado-Lucas, Agustin Albillos
{"title":"超声内镜引导下细针抽吸正中纵隔肺肿块的诊断率及安全性。","authors":"Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel Boixeda-Miquel, Diego Juzgado-Lucas, Agustin Albillos","doi":"10.1155/2013/150492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.","PeriodicalId":11288,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","volume":"2013 ","pages":"150492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/150492","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Vazquez-Sequeiros, Michael J Levy, Manuel Van Domselaar, Fernando González-Panizo, Jose Ramon Foruny-Olcina, Daniel Boixeda-Miquel, Diego Juzgado-Lucas, Agustin Albillos\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/150492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11288,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"150492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/150492\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/150492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

未标明:背景和目的。EUS-FNA是一种准确、安全的纵隔淋巴结活检技术。然而,很少有关于EUS-FNA在活检中央肺肿块中的作用的数据。本研究的目的是评估EUS-FNA对不确定的中央纵隔肺肿块的诊断率和安全性。方法。设计:对前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性审查;noncomparative。单位:三级转诊中心。从2004年10月至2010年12月,所有位于食管附近的肺肿块患者均接受EUS-FNA检查。主要观察指标:EUS-FNA诊断的准确性和安全性。结果:连续纳入73例患者。EUS允许62例(85%)患者检测到,11例患者缺乏视觉禁止FNA。样本病变中,1例(1/62 = 1.6%)为良性肺肿块(错构瘤),其余61例(61/62 = 98.4%)为恶性肿块(原发性肺癌:55/61 = 90%;肺转移:6/61 = 10%)。EUS-FNA的敏感性为96.7%,特异性为100%,准确性为96.7%。当考虑未见肿块时,敏感性为80.8%。1例患者发生气胸(1/62 = 1.6%)。结论。EUS-FNA是一种准确、安全的诊断中纵隔肺肿块的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.

Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.

Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.

Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of central mediastinal lung masses.
Background and Aims. EUS-FNA is an accurate and safe technique to biopsy mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there are few data pertaining to the role of EUS-FNA to biopsy central lung masses. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA of indeterminate central mediastinal lung masses. Methods. Design: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database; noncomparative. Setting: Tertiary referral center. From 10/2004 to 12/2010, all patients with a lung mass located within proximity to the esophagus were referred for EUS-FNA. Main Outcome Measurement: EUS-FNA diagnostic accuracy and safety. Results. 73 consecutive patients were included. EUS allowed detection in 62 (85%) patients with lack of visualization prohibiting FNA in 11 patients. Among sampled lesions, one patient (1/62 = 1.6%) had a benign lung mass (hamartoma), while the remaining 61 patients (61/62 = 98.4%) had a malignant mass (primary lung cancer: 55/61 = 90%; lung metastasis: 6/61 = 10%). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-FNA were 96.7%, 100%, and 96.7%, respectively. The sensitivity was 80.8% when considering nonvisualized masses. One patient developed a pneumothorax (1/62 = 1.6%). Conclusions. EUS-FNA appears to be an accurate and safe technique for tissue diagnosis of central mediastinal lung masses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信