健康绵羊抗凝血中活性氮和活性氧。

Expert opinion on medical diagnostics Pub Date : 2013-09-01 Epub Date: 2013-06-27 DOI:10.1517/17530059.2013.808187
Ezekiel Uba Nwose, Phillip Taderera Bwititi, Melissa Judith Chalada
{"title":"健康绵羊抗凝血中活性氮和活性氧。","authors":"Ezekiel Uba Nwose,&nbsp;Phillip Taderera Bwititi,&nbsp;Melissa Judith Chalada","doi":"10.1517/17530059.2013.808187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little or no study has been done to compare the indices of 'nitrosative' and 'oxidative' stresses, especially in terms of correlation and the possible differential effects of the chelating agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This preliminary study investigated possible correlations between the indices of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in blood, effect of anticoagulated-blood tubes, and impact of blood-clotting pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty blood samples from sheep were collected into ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citrate tubes at the Berrima Veterinary Laboratory using their standard protocol. Nitrosative and oxidative stress indices were then measured and correlation analyses performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROS and RNS indices were weakly correlated (r > 0.2; p < 0.05) with each other from the EDTA sample, but not from citrated blood. None of the nitrosative or oxidative stress biomarkers was significantly associated with changes in the prothrombin time. The activated partial thromboplastin time showed statistically significant association with some oxidative stress indices (catalase and malondialdehyde), but with none of the nitrosative stress indices. Further, all measured parameters were higher in EDTA than in citrate blood (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of anticoagulated blood tube could affect the measures of nitrosative stress indices and may impact on the potential correlations between nitrosative versus oxidative stress biomarkers. Perhaps the suggestion that EDTA is better than citrate for hematological anticoagulant studies should be considered for nitrosative and oxidative stress studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":72996,"journal":{"name":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","volume":"7 5","pages":"427-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.808187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reactive nitrogen and oxygen species in anticoagulated blood of healthy sheep.\",\"authors\":\"Ezekiel Uba Nwose,&nbsp;Phillip Taderera Bwititi,&nbsp;Melissa Judith Chalada\",\"doi\":\"10.1517/17530059.2013.808187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little or no study has been done to compare the indices of 'nitrosative' and 'oxidative' stresses, especially in terms of correlation and the possible differential effects of the chelating agents.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This preliminary study investigated possible correlations between the indices of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in blood, effect of anticoagulated-blood tubes, and impact of blood-clotting pathways.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty blood samples from sheep were collected into ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citrate tubes at the Berrima Veterinary Laboratory using their standard protocol. Nitrosative and oxidative stress indices were then measured and correlation analyses performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ROS and RNS indices were weakly correlated (r > 0.2; p < 0.05) with each other from the EDTA sample, but not from citrated blood. None of the nitrosative or oxidative stress biomarkers was significantly associated with changes in the prothrombin time. The activated partial thromboplastin time showed statistically significant association with some oxidative stress indices (catalase and malondialdehyde), but with none of the nitrosative stress indices. Further, all measured parameters were higher in EDTA than in citrate blood (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The choice of anticoagulated blood tube could affect the measures of nitrosative stress indices and may impact on the potential correlations between nitrosative versus oxidative stress biomarkers. Perhaps the suggestion that EDTA is better than citrate for hematological anticoagulant studies should be considered for nitrosative and oxidative stress studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"7 5\",\"pages\":\"427-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1517/17530059.2013.808187\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.808187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/6/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert opinion on medical diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1517/17530059.2013.808187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:很少或没有研究对“亚硝化”和“氧化”应激指标进行比较,特别是在螯合剂的相关性和可能的差异效应方面。目的:初步探讨血中活性氮(RNS)和活性氧(ROS)指标之间可能存在的相关性、抗凝血管的作用及对凝血途径的影响。方法:在Berrima兽医实验室按标准方案采集30只羊的血液,分别装入乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和柠檬酸盐管中。然后测量亚硝化和氧化应激指数并进行相关分析。结果:ROS与RNS指标呈弱相关(r > 0.2;p < 0.05),但与柠檬酸血不一致。没有一种亚硝化或氧化应激生物标志物与凝血酶原时间的变化显著相关。活化的部分凝血活酶时间与氧化应激指标(过氧化氢酶和丙二醛)有显著相关性,而与亚硝化应激指标无显著相关性。此外,EDTA组的所有测量参数均高于柠檬酸血组(p < 0.0001)。结论:抗凝血管的选择会影响亚硝化应激指标的测量,并可能影响亚硝化与氧化应激生物标志物之间的潜在相关性。也许EDTA在血液抗凝研究中优于柠檬酸盐的建议应该被考虑到亚硝化和氧化应激研究中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reactive nitrogen and oxygen species in anticoagulated blood of healthy sheep.

Background: Little or no study has been done to compare the indices of 'nitrosative' and 'oxidative' stresses, especially in terms of correlation and the possible differential effects of the chelating agents.

Objective: This preliminary study investigated possible correlations between the indices of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in blood, effect of anticoagulated-blood tubes, and impact of blood-clotting pathways.

Methods: Thirty blood samples from sheep were collected into ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and citrate tubes at the Berrima Veterinary Laboratory using their standard protocol. Nitrosative and oxidative stress indices were then measured and correlation analyses performed.

Results: The ROS and RNS indices were weakly correlated (r > 0.2; p < 0.05) with each other from the EDTA sample, but not from citrated blood. None of the nitrosative or oxidative stress biomarkers was significantly associated with changes in the prothrombin time. The activated partial thromboplastin time showed statistically significant association with some oxidative stress indices (catalase and malondialdehyde), but with none of the nitrosative stress indices. Further, all measured parameters were higher in EDTA than in citrate blood (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: The choice of anticoagulated blood tube could affect the measures of nitrosative stress indices and may impact on the potential correlations between nitrosative versus oxidative stress biomarkers. Perhaps the suggestion that EDTA is better than citrate for hematological anticoagulant studies should be considered for nitrosative and oxidative stress studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信