考试成绩、班级排名和大学表现:拓宽机会和促进成功的经验教训。

Q3 Social Sciences
Sunny X Niu, Marta Tienda
{"title":"考试成绩、班级排名和大学表现:拓宽机会和促进成功的经验教训。","authors":"Sunny X Niu,&nbsp;Marta Tienda","doi":"10.1423/37519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using administrative data for five Texas universities that differ in selectivity, this study evaluates the relative influence of two key indicators for college success-high school class rank and standardized tests. Empirical results show that class rank is the superior predictor of college performance and that test score advantages do not insulate lower ranked students from academic underperformance. Using the UT-Austin campus as a test case, we conduct a simulation to evaluate the consequences of capping students admitted automatically using both achievement metrics. We find that using class rank to cap the number of students eligible for automatic admission would have roughly uniform impacts across high schools, but imposing a minimum test score threshold on all students would have highly unequal consequences by greatly reduce the admission eligibility of the highest performing students who attend poor high schools while not jeopardizing admissibility of students who attend affluent high schools. We discuss the implications of the Texas admissions experiment for higher education in Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":39540,"journal":{"name":"Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia","volume":"2 ","pages":"199-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685191/pdf/nihms428181.pdf","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test Scores, Class Rank and College Performance: Lessons for Broadening Access and Promoting Success.\",\"authors\":\"Sunny X Niu,&nbsp;Marta Tienda\",\"doi\":\"10.1423/37519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using administrative data for five Texas universities that differ in selectivity, this study evaluates the relative influence of two key indicators for college success-high school class rank and standardized tests. Empirical results show that class rank is the superior predictor of college performance and that test score advantages do not insulate lower ranked students from academic underperformance. Using the UT-Austin campus as a test case, we conduct a simulation to evaluate the consequences of capping students admitted automatically using both achievement metrics. We find that using class rank to cap the number of students eligible for automatic admission would have roughly uniform impacts across high schools, but imposing a minimum test score threshold on all students would have highly unequal consequences by greatly reduce the admission eligibility of the highest performing students who attend poor high schools while not jeopardizing admissibility of students who attend affluent high schools. We discuss the implications of the Texas admissions experiment for higher education in Europe.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"199-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3685191/pdf/nihms428181.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1423/37519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1423/37519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

利用德克萨斯州五所大学的行政数据,本研究评估了大学成功的两个关键指标——高中班级排名和标准化考试的相对影响。实证结果表明,班级排名是大学表现的最佳预测指标,考试成绩优势并不能使排名较低的学生免受学业表现不佳的影响。以德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校为例,我们进行了模拟,以评估使用两种成就指标自动限制学生录取的后果。我们发现,使用班级排名来限制有资格自动录取的学生人数,对所有高中的影响大致相同,但对所有学生施加最低考试分数门槛,会产生高度不平等的后果,因为它会大大降低就读于贫困高中的表现最好的学生的录取资格,同时不会危及就读于富裕高中的学生的录取资格。我们讨论了德克萨斯州的招生实验对欧洲高等教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Test Scores, Class Rank and College Performance: Lessons for Broadening Access and Promoting Success.

Test Scores, Class Rank and College Performance: Lessons for Broadening Access and Promoting Success.

Using administrative data for five Texas universities that differ in selectivity, this study evaluates the relative influence of two key indicators for college success-high school class rank and standardized tests. Empirical results show that class rank is the superior predictor of college performance and that test score advantages do not insulate lower ranked students from academic underperformance. Using the UT-Austin campus as a test case, we conduct a simulation to evaluate the consequences of capping students admitted automatically using both achievement metrics. We find that using class rank to cap the number of students eligible for automatic admission would have roughly uniform impacts across high schools, but imposing a minimum test score threshold on all students would have highly unequal consequences by greatly reduce the admission eligibility of the highest performing students who attend poor high schools while not jeopardizing admissibility of students who attend affluent high schools. We discuss the implications of the Texas admissions experiment for higher education in Europe.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia
Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信