滑动力学中不同结扎方法对摩擦的体外评价。

Govind R Suryawanshi, Shobha Sundareswaran, Koshi Philip, Sreejith Kumar
{"title":"滑动力学中不同结扎方法对摩擦的体外评价。","authors":"Govind R Suryawanshi,&nbsp;Shobha Sundareswaran,&nbsp;Koshi Philip,&nbsp;Sreejith Kumar","doi":"10.11607/ortho.905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different methods of ligation in tie configurations on friction in dry and wet conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four methods of ligations were used: regular round tie, figure eight, twist, and diagonal. Materials used were Alastik (3M Unitek), Power O module (ORMCO), O-ring ligatures (JES), stainless steel ligatures (TP Orthodontics), 0.019 × 0.025-inch straight-length stainless steel archwires and stainless steel MBT 0.022-inch slot brackets (3M Unitek).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Figure eight ligation had the highest friction, followed by round, twist, and diagonal ligation, in the descending order. Comparisons were statistically significant with a 100-g load. Dry group samples had higher friction than the wet group. These comparisons were statistically significant with a 50-g load.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concluded that figure eight ligation had the highest friction, and diagonal ligation produced the least friction. Among the dry and wet groups, lubrication showed significant reduction in friction.</p>","PeriodicalId":89450,"journal":{"name":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","volume":"14 1","pages":"e102-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/ortho.905","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro evaluation of different methods of ligation on friction in sliding mechanics.\",\"authors\":\"Govind R Suryawanshi,&nbsp;Shobha Sundareswaran,&nbsp;Koshi Philip,&nbsp;Sreejith Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.11607/ortho.905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different methods of ligation in tie configurations on friction in dry and wet conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four methods of ligations were used: regular round tie, figure eight, twist, and diagonal. Materials used were Alastik (3M Unitek), Power O module (ORMCO), O-ring ligatures (JES), stainless steel ligatures (TP Orthodontics), 0.019 × 0.025-inch straight-length stainless steel archwires and stainless steel MBT 0.022-inch slot brackets (3M Unitek).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Figure eight ligation had the highest friction, followed by round, twist, and diagonal ligation, in the descending order. Comparisons were statistically significant with a 100-g load. Dry group samples had higher friction than the wet group. These comparisons were statistically significant with a 50-g load.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study concluded that figure eight ligation had the highest friction, and diagonal ligation produced the least friction. Among the dry and wet groups, lubrication showed significant reduction in friction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"e102-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11607/ortho.905\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11607/ortho.905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthodontics : the art and practice of dentofacial enhancement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ortho.905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估在干燥和潮湿条件下不同结扎方式对摩擦的影响。方法:采用常规圆扎法、八字形结扎法、捻扎法、斜扎法四种结扎方法。使用的材料为Alastik (3M Unitek), Power O模块(ORMCO), O型圈结扎(JES),不锈钢结扎(TP Orthodontics), 0.019 × 0.025英寸直长不锈钢弓丝,不锈钢MBT 0.022英寸槽托(3M Unitek)。结果:8字形结扎摩擦力最大,依次为圆形结扎、扭转结扎、对角结扎。当负荷为100 g时,比较具有统计学意义。干组试样的摩擦系数高于湿组。这些比较在50g负荷下具有统计学意义。结论:8字形结扎摩擦最大,对角线结扎摩擦最小。在干湿两组中,润滑显著降低了摩擦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro evaluation of different methods of ligation on friction in sliding mechanics.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different methods of ligation in tie configurations on friction in dry and wet conditions.

Methods: Four methods of ligations were used: regular round tie, figure eight, twist, and diagonal. Materials used were Alastik (3M Unitek), Power O module (ORMCO), O-ring ligatures (JES), stainless steel ligatures (TP Orthodontics), 0.019 × 0.025-inch straight-length stainless steel archwires and stainless steel MBT 0.022-inch slot brackets (3M Unitek).

Results: Figure eight ligation had the highest friction, followed by round, twist, and diagonal ligation, in the descending order. Comparisons were statistically significant with a 100-g load. Dry group samples had higher friction than the wet group. These comparisons were statistically significant with a 50-g load.

Conclusions: The study concluded that figure eight ligation had the highest friction, and diagonal ligation produced the least friction. Among the dry and wet groups, lubrication showed significant reduction in friction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信