局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后的最佳手术时机。

Journal of the Korean Surgical Society Pub Date : 2013-06-01 Epub Date: 2013-05-28 DOI:10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338
Duck Hyoun Jeong, Han Beom Lee, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后的最佳手术时机。","authors":"Duck Hyoun Jeong,&nbsp;Han Beom Lee,&nbsp;Hyuk Hur,&nbsp;Byung Soh Min,&nbsp;Seung Hyuk Baik,&nbsp;Nam Kyu Kim","doi":"10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal time between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer has been debated. This study evaluated the influence of this interval on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared postoperative complications, pathological downstaging, disease recurrence, and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection <8 weeks (group A, n = 105) to those who had surgery ≥8 weeks (group B, n = 48) after neoadjuvant CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 patients, 117 (76.5%) were male and 36 (23.5%) were female. Mean age was 57.8 years (range, 28 to 79 years). There was no difference in the rate of sphincter preserving surgery between the two groups (group A, 82.7% vs. group B, 77.6%; P = 0.509). The longer interval group had decreased postoperative complications, although statistical significance was not reached (group A, 28.8% vs. group B, 14.3%; P = 0.068). A total of 111 (group A, 75 [71.4%] and group B, 36 [75%]) patients were downstaged and 26 (group A, 17 [16.2%] and group B, 9 [18%]) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). There was no significant difference in the pCR rate (P = 0.817). The longer interval group experienced significant improvement in the nodal (N) downstaging rate (group A, 46.7% vs. group B, 66.7%; P = 0.024). The local recurrence (P = 0.279), distant recurrence (P = 0.427), disease-free survival (P = 0.967), and overall survival (P = 0.825) rates were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is worth delaying surgical resection for 8 weeks or more after completion of CRT as it is safe and is associated with higher nodal downstaging rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49991,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","volume":"84 6","pages":"338-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Duck Hyoun Jeong,&nbsp;Han Beom Lee,&nbsp;Hyuk Hur,&nbsp;Byung Soh Min,&nbsp;Seung Hyuk Baik,&nbsp;Nam Kyu Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The optimal time between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer has been debated. This study evaluated the influence of this interval on oncological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared postoperative complications, pathological downstaging, disease recurrence, and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection <8 weeks (group A, n = 105) to those who had surgery ≥8 weeks (group B, n = 48) after neoadjuvant CRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 153 patients, 117 (76.5%) were male and 36 (23.5%) were female. Mean age was 57.8 years (range, 28 to 79 years). There was no difference in the rate of sphincter preserving surgery between the two groups (group A, 82.7% vs. group B, 77.6%; P = 0.509). The longer interval group had decreased postoperative complications, although statistical significance was not reached (group A, 28.8% vs. group B, 14.3%; P = 0.068). A total of 111 (group A, 75 [71.4%] and group B, 36 [75%]) patients were downstaged and 26 (group A, 17 [16.2%] and group B, 9 [18%]) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). There was no significant difference in the pCR rate (P = 0.817). The longer interval group experienced significant improvement in the nodal (N) downstaging rate (group A, 46.7% vs. group B, 66.7%; P = 0.024). The local recurrence (P = 0.279), distant recurrence (P = 0.427), disease-free survival (P = 0.967), and overall survival (P = 0.825) rates were not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is worth delaying surgical resection for 8 weeks or more after completion of CRT as it is safe and is associated with higher nodal downstaging rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"volume\":\"84 6\",\"pages\":\"338-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Surgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4174/jkss.2013.84.6.338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

目的:直肠癌新辅助放化疗(CRT)与手术之间的最佳时间一直存在争议。本研究评估了这段时间间隔对肿瘤预后的影响。方法:比较局部晚期直肠癌手术切除患者的术后并发症、病理降分期、疾病复发和生存率。结果:153例患者中,男性117例(76.5%),女性36例(23.5%)。平均年龄57.8岁(28 ~ 79岁)。两组间保留括约肌手术率无差异(A组为82.7%,B组为77.6%;P = 0.509)。较长间隔组术后并发症减少,但未达到统计学意义(A组28.8% vs. B组14.3%;P = 0.068)。共有111例(A组75例[71.4%],B组36例[75%])患者被降级,26例(A组17例[16.2%],B组9例[18%])患者达到病理完全缓解(pCR)。两组间pCR率差异无统计学意义(P = 0.817)。较长时间间隔组在淋巴结(N)降期率方面有显著改善(A组46.7%,B组66.7%;P = 0.024)。两组局部复发率(P = 0.279)、远处复发率(P = 0.427)、无病生存率(P = 0.967)、总生存率(P = 0.825)无显著性差异。结论:CRT完成后延迟手术切除8周或更长时间是安全的,且与较高的淋巴结降分期率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Optimal timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Purpose: The optimal time between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery for rectal cancer has been debated. This study evaluated the influence of this interval on oncological outcomes.

Methods: We compared postoperative complications, pathological downstaging, disease recurrence, and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection <8 weeks (group A, n = 105) to those who had surgery ≥8 weeks (group B, n = 48) after neoadjuvant CRT.

Results: Of 153 patients, 117 (76.5%) were male and 36 (23.5%) were female. Mean age was 57.8 years (range, 28 to 79 years). There was no difference in the rate of sphincter preserving surgery between the two groups (group A, 82.7% vs. group B, 77.6%; P = 0.509). The longer interval group had decreased postoperative complications, although statistical significance was not reached (group A, 28.8% vs. group B, 14.3%; P = 0.068). A total of 111 (group A, 75 [71.4%] and group B, 36 [75%]) patients were downstaged and 26 (group A, 17 [16.2%] and group B, 9 [18%]) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). There was no significant difference in the pCR rate (P = 0.817). The longer interval group experienced significant improvement in the nodal (N) downstaging rate (group A, 46.7% vs. group B, 66.7%; P = 0.024). The local recurrence (P = 0.279), distant recurrence (P = 0.427), disease-free survival (P = 0.967), and overall survival (P = 0.825) rates were not significantly different.

Conclusion: It is worth delaying surgical resection for 8 weeks or more after completion of CRT as it is safe and is associated with higher nodal downstaging rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信