Kurt B Angstman, Pamela Pietruszewski, Norman H Rasmussen, John M Wilkinson, David J Katzelnick
{"title":"协作护理管理六个月后抑郁症缓解:抑郁症初始严重程度在结果中的作用。","authors":"Kurt B Angstman, Pamela Pietruszewski, Norman H Rasmussen, John M Wilkinson, David J Katzelnick","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aim The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a sub-group demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at six months. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":89603,"journal":{"name":"Mental health in family medicine","volume":"9 2","pages":"99-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513702/pdf/MHFM-09-099.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management: role of initial severity of depression in outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Kurt B Angstman, Pamela Pietruszewski, Norman H Rasmussen, John M Wilkinson, David J Katzelnick\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aim The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a sub-group demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at six months. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental health in family medicine\",\"volume\":\"9 2\",\"pages\":\"99-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3513702/pdf/MHFM-09-099.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental health in family medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health in family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的抑郁症的初始严重程度对缓解率的影响尚未得到很好的研究。本研究的假设是,在合作护理管理中,抑郁症严重程度的增加与6个月的临床缓解呈反比关系。研究队列为1128名来自明尼苏达州东南部诊所的初级保健患者,采用纵向回顾性图表分析。结果重度抑郁组患者6个月临床缓解率为29.6%,而中度抑郁组为36.9%,中度抑郁组为45.6% (P < 0.001)。一个亚组的多变量分析显示,初始焦虑症状的增加(比值比[OR] 0.9645, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248)和双相情感障碍的异常筛查(比值比[OR] 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187)预示着6个月后无法获得缓解。与中度抑郁症患者相比,重度抑郁症患者在6个月时获得缓解的可能性显著降低(OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327),但不存在中度重度抑郁症患者(P = 0.2324)。6个月缓解期患者的PHQ-9评分的调整平均值无统计学差异。然而,在未缓解的患者中,当控制所有其他变量时,6个月的PHQ-9评分因初始抑郁严重程度而显着增加。结论本研究的多变量分析表明,重度抑郁症患者与中度抑郁症患者相比,6个月缓解OR降低。此外,在重度和中度抑郁症组中,未缓解的患者的六个月PHQ-9评分显着增加。
Depression remission after six months of collaborative care management: role of initial severity of depression in outcome.
Aim The impact of initial severity of depression on the rate of remission has not been well studied. The hypothesis for this study was that increased depression severity would have an inverse relationship on clinical remission at six months while in collaborative care management. Participants The study cohort was 1128 primary care patients from a south-eastern Minnesota practice and was a longitudinal retrospective chart review analysis. Results Clinical remission at six months was less likely in the severe depression group at 29.6% compared with 36.9% in the moderately severe group and 45.6% in the moderate depression group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of a sub-group demonstrated that increased initial anxiety symptoms (odds ratio [OR] 0.9645, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9345-0.9954, P = 0.0248) and an abnormal screening for bipolar disorder (OR 0.4856, 95% CI 0.2659-0.8868, P = 0.0187) predicted not achieving remission at six months. A patient with severe depression was significantly less likely to achieve remission at six months (OR 0.6040, 95% CI 0.3803-0.9592, P = 0.0327) compared with moderate depression, but not moderately severe depression (P = 0.2324). There was no statistical difference in the adjusted means of the PHQ-9 score for those patients who were in remission at six months. However, in the unremitted patients, the six-month PHQ-9 score was significantly increased by initial depression severity when controlling for all other variables. Conclusion Multivariate analysis in our study demonstrated that patients with severe depression have a decreased OR for remission at six months compared with moderate depression. Also, there was a significant increase in the six-month PHQ-9 score for those unremitted patients in the severe vs. moderate depression groups.