Samir M Said, Hans D Esperer, Kathrin Kluba, Conrad Genz, Thomas Rauwolf, Alexander Schmeisser, Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus
{"title":"哪些患者最有可能从无人机龙获益?马格德堡无人机登记(MADRE研究)分析。","authors":"Samir M Said, Hans D Esperer, Kathrin Kluba, Conrad Genz, Thomas Rauwolf, Alexander Schmeisser, Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus","doi":"10.1002/jcph.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on an analysis of the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry data we sought to determine which patients could benefit from dronedarone therapy regarding rhythm control. The study included 191 patients (85 women) aged 63 ± 10 years with a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF and a follow-up of 14 ± 5 months. The total AF recurrence rate was 67% and lone AF was significantly more often associated with AF recurrences than non-lone AF (84% vs. 62%, P = .01). Arterial hypertension, treated coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly related to AF recurrences (64%, 67%, 58% resp. P = .3). Response rate to dronedarone in patients with slightly increased left atrial size was significantly greater than in patients with normal or markedly increased left atrial size (47%, 16%, 27% resp., P = .001). The rate of adverse effects was 32% in the study sample, and was significantly lower in patients with lone AF as compared to those with non-lone AF (11% vs. 37%, P = .002). The body mass index was a predictor neither of response rate nor adverse effects. The results suggest that dronedarone is more effective in patients with non-lone AF and slightly increased left atrial size. </p>","PeriodicalId":48908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"53 8","pages":"841-5"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.103","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which patient is most likely to benefit from dronedarone? Analysis from the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry (MADRE study).\",\"authors\":\"Samir M Said, Hans D Esperer, Kathrin Kluba, Conrad Genz, Thomas Rauwolf, Alexander Schmeisser, Ruediger C Braun-Dullaeus\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Based on an analysis of the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry data we sought to determine which patients could benefit from dronedarone therapy regarding rhythm control. The study included 191 patients (85 women) aged 63 ± 10 years with a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF and a follow-up of 14 ± 5 months. The total AF recurrence rate was 67% and lone AF was significantly more often associated with AF recurrences than non-lone AF (84% vs. 62%, P = .01). Arterial hypertension, treated coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly related to AF recurrences (64%, 67%, 58% resp. P = .3). Response rate to dronedarone in patients with slightly increased left atrial size was significantly greater than in patients with normal or markedly increased left atrial size (47%, 16%, 27% resp., P = .001). The rate of adverse effects was 32% in the study sample, and was significantly lower in patients with lone AF as compared to those with non-lone AF (11% vs. 37%, P = .002). The body mass index was a predictor neither of response rate nor adverse effects. The results suggest that dronedarone is more effective in patients with non-lone AF and slightly increased left atrial size. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"53 8\",\"pages\":\"841-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jcph.103\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Which patient is most likely to benefit from dronedarone? Analysis from the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry (MADRE study).
Based on an analysis of the Magdeburg Dronedarone Registry data we sought to determine which patients could benefit from dronedarone therapy regarding rhythm control. The study included 191 patients (85 women) aged 63 ± 10 years with a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF and a follow-up of 14 ± 5 months. The total AF recurrence rate was 67% and lone AF was significantly more often associated with AF recurrences than non-lone AF (84% vs. 62%, P = .01). Arterial hypertension, treated coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus were not significantly related to AF recurrences (64%, 67%, 58% resp. P = .3). Response rate to dronedarone in patients with slightly increased left atrial size was significantly greater than in patients with normal or markedly increased left atrial size (47%, 16%, 27% resp., P = .001). The rate of adverse effects was 32% in the study sample, and was significantly lower in patients with lone AF as compared to those with non-lone AF (11% vs. 37%, P = .002). The body mass index was a predictor neither of response rate nor adverse effects. The results suggest that dronedarone is more effective in patients with non-lone AF and slightly increased left atrial size.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (JCP) is a Human Pharmacology journal designed to provide physicians, pharmacists, research scientists, regulatory scientists, drug developers and academic colleagues a forum to present research in all aspects of Clinical Pharmacology. This includes original research in pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics/pharmacogenomics, pharmacometrics, physiologic based pharmacokinetic modeling, drug interactions, therapeutic drug monitoring, regulatory sciences (including unique methods of data analysis), special population studies, drug development, pharmacovigilance, womens’ health, pediatric pharmacology, and pharmacodynamics. Additionally, JCP publishes review articles, commentaries and educational manuscripts. The Journal also serves as an instrument to disseminate Public Policy statements from the American College of Clinical Pharmacology.