Sydney Ch'ng, Justine Oates, Kan Gao, Kerwyn Foo, Sarah Davies, Markus Brunner, Jonathan R Clark
{"title":"口腔鳞状细胞癌治疗组间的前瞻性生活质量评价。","authors":"Sydney Ch'ng, Justine Oates, Kan Gao, Kerwyn Foo, Sarah Davies, Markus Brunner, Jonathan R Clark","doi":"10.1002/hed.23387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is frequently recommended to improve survival outcome. The effect of PORT-associated morbidity on patients' quality of life (QOL) is, however, not well established. This study assessed the effect of PORT on medium-term (ie, at 6 months) QOL in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-HN35) at initial presentation, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Baseline QOL scores were adjusted for using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Global health status (mean difference = 13.3; p = .042) and xerostomia (mean difference = 35.4; p = .003) were significantly worse at 6 months in patients who received PORT compared to those treated with surgery alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survival advantage needs to be balanced against increased treatment toxicity. PORT is associated with reduced global health status, increased xerostomia, and marginally increased levels of fatigue at 6 months posttreatment for oral cavity cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":501638,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck","volume":" ","pages":"834-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hed.23387","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective quality of life assessment between treatment groups for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Sydney Ch'ng, Justine Oates, Kan Gao, Kerwyn Foo, Sarah Davies, Markus Brunner, Jonathan R Clark\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hed.23387\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is frequently recommended to improve survival outcome. The effect of PORT-associated morbidity on patients' quality of life (QOL) is, however, not well established. This study assessed the effect of PORT on medium-term (ie, at 6 months) QOL in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-HN35) at initial presentation, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Baseline QOL scores were adjusted for using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Global health status (mean difference = 13.3; p = .042) and xerostomia (mean difference = 35.4; p = .003) were significantly worse at 6 months in patients who received PORT compared to those treated with surgery alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The survival advantage needs to be balanced against increased treatment toxicity. PORT is associated with reduced global health status, increased xerostomia, and marginally increased levels of fatigue at 6 months posttreatment for oral cavity cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Neck\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"834-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/hed.23387\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Neck\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23387\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/9/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prospective quality of life assessment between treatment groups for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.
Background: Postoperative radiation therapy (PORT) is frequently recommended to improve survival outcome. The effect of PORT-associated morbidity on patients' quality of life (QOL) is, however, not well established. This study assessed the effect of PORT on medium-term (ie, at 6 months) QOL in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).
Methods: Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Head and Neck 35 (QLQ-HN35) at initial presentation, and at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. Baseline QOL scores were adjusted for using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).
Results: Global health status (mean difference = 13.3; p = .042) and xerostomia (mean difference = 35.4; p = .003) were significantly worse at 6 months in patients who received PORT compared to those treated with surgery alone.
Conclusion: The survival advantage needs to be balanced against increased treatment toxicity. PORT is associated with reduced global health status, increased xerostomia, and marginally increased levels of fatigue at 6 months posttreatment for oral cavity cancer.