使用质量指标促进医疗保健的问责制:好、坏、丑。

Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal Pub Date : 2012-06-19 Print Date: 2012-01-01
Alan J Forster, Carl van Walraven
{"title":"使用质量指标促进医疗保健的问责制:好、坏、丑。","authors":"Alan J Forster, Carl van Walraven","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Canada, we place significant cultural and financial value on our healthcare system.  As such, it is imperative we measure its quality.  In this commentary, we highlight some of the potential benefits and harms associated with measuring quality using currently available indicators, such as hospital mortality rates, emergency department length of stays, and readmission rates.  These measures tend to focus on provider and process issues rather than patient outcomes and also reflect what we can measure rather than what we should measure.  We argue that the current approaches are inadequate and recommend a better understanding of the limitations of current indicators and more provider engagement.  To meet these recommendations the health system needs to increased investment in performance measurement systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":88624,"journal":{"name":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","volume":"6 2","pages":"e75-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/51/OpenMed-06-e75.PMC3659217.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of quality indicators to promote accountability in health care: the good, the bad, and the ugly.\",\"authors\":\"Alan J Forster, Carl van Walraven\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In Canada, we place significant cultural and financial value on our healthcare system.  As such, it is imperative we measure its quality.  In this commentary, we highlight some of the potential benefits and harms associated with measuring quality using currently available indicators, such as hospital mortality rates, emergency department length of stays, and readmission rates.  These measures tend to focus on provider and process issues rather than patient outcomes and also reflect what we can measure rather than what we should measure.  We argue that the current approaches are inadequate and recommend a better understanding of the limitations of current indicators and more provider engagement.  To meet these recommendations the health system needs to increased investment in performance measurement systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":88624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"e75-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/65/51/OpenMed-06-e75.PMC3659217.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2012/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2012/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在加拿大,我们从文化和经济上高度重视医疗保健系统。 因此,我们必须衡量其质量。 在这篇评论中,我们强调了使用目前可用的指标(如医院死亡率、急诊科住院时间和再入院率)衡量质量的一些潜在益处和危害。 这些衡量指标往往关注的是提供者和流程问题,而不是患者的治疗效果,同时也反映了我们能够衡量的东西,而不是我们应该衡量的东西。 我们认为,目前的方法是不够的,并建议更好地理解目前指标的局限性,让医疗服务提供者更多地参与进来。 为了满足这些建议,医疗系统需要增加对绩效衡量系统的投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The use of quality indicators to promote accountability in health care: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

The use of quality indicators to promote accountability in health care: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

In Canada, we place significant cultural and financial value on our healthcare system.  As such, it is imperative we measure its quality.  In this commentary, we highlight some of the potential benefits and harms associated with measuring quality using currently available indicators, such as hospital mortality rates, emergency department length of stays, and readmission rates.  These measures tend to focus on provider and process issues rather than patient outcomes and also reflect what we can measure rather than what we should measure.  We argue that the current approaches are inadequate and recommend a better understanding of the limitations of current indicators and more provider engagement.  To meet these recommendations the health system needs to increased investment in performance measurement systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信