作为流感监测工具的即时检测:方法和实施的经验教训。

Influenza research and treatment Pub Date : 2013-01-01 Epub Date: 2013-04-11 DOI:10.1155/2013/242970
Lisa H Gren, Christina A Porucznik, Elizabeth A Joy, Joseph L Lyon, Catherine J Staes, Stephen C Alder
{"title":"作为流感监测工具的即时检测:方法和实施的经验教训。","authors":"Lisa H Gren,&nbsp;Christina A Porucznik,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Joy,&nbsp;Joseph L Lyon,&nbsp;Catherine J Staes,&nbsp;Stephen C Alder","doi":"10.1155/2013/242970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objectives. Disease surveillance combines data collection and analysis with dissemination of findings to decision makers. The timeliness of these activities affects the ability to implement preventive measures. Influenza surveillance has traditionally been hampered by delays in both data collection and dissemination. Methods. We used statistical process control (SPC) to evaluate the daily percentage of outpatient visits with a positive point-of-care (POC) influenza test in the University of Utah Primary Care Research Network. Results. Retrospectively, POC testing generated an alert in each of 4 seasons (2004-2008, median 16 days before epidemic onset), suggesting that email notification of clinicians would be 9 days earlier than surveillance alerts posted to the Utah Department of Health website. In the 2008-09 season, the algorithm generated a real-time alert 19 days before epidemic onset. Clinicians in 4 intervention clinics received email notification of the alert within 4 days. Compared with clinicians in 6 control clinics, intervention clinicians were 40% more likely to perform rapid testing (P = 0.105) and twice as likely to vaccinate for seasonal influenza (P = 0.104) after notification. Conclusions. Email notification of SPC-generated alerts provided significantly earlier notification of the epidemic onset than traditional surveillance. Clinician preventive behavior was not significantly different in intervention clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":89679,"journal":{"name":"Influenza research and treatment","volume":"2013 ","pages":"242970"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/242970","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-of-Care Testing as an Influenza Surveillance Tool: Methodology and Lessons Learned from Implementation.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa H Gren,&nbsp;Christina A Porucznik,&nbsp;Elizabeth A Joy,&nbsp;Joseph L Lyon,&nbsp;Catherine J Staes,&nbsp;Stephen C Alder\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/242970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objectives. Disease surveillance combines data collection and analysis with dissemination of findings to decision makers. The timeliness of these activities affects the ability to implement preventive measures. Influenza surveillance has traditionally been hampered by delays in both data collection and dissemination. Methods. We used statistical process control (SPC) to evaluate the daily percentage of outpatient visits with a positive point-of-care (POC) influenza test in the University of Utah Primary Care Research Network. Results. Retrospectively, POC testing generated an alert in each of 4 seasons (2004-2008, median 16 days before epidemic onset), suggesting that email notification of clinicians would be 9 days earlier than surveillance alerts posted to the Utah Department of Health website. In the 2008-09 season, the algorithm generated a real-time alert 19 days before epidemic onset. Clinicians in 4 intervention clinics received email notification of the alert within 4 days. Compared with clinicians in 6 control clinics, intervention clinicians were 40% more likely to perform rapid testing (P = 0.105) and twice as likely to vaccinate for seasonal influenza (P = 0.104) after notification. Conclusions. Email notification of SPC-generated alerts provided significantly earlier notification of the epidemic onset than traditional surveillance. Clinician preventive behavior was not significantly different in intervention clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Influenza research and treatment\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"242970\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/242970\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Influenza research and treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/242970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/4/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Influenza research and treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/242970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目标。疾病监测将数据收集和分析与向决策者传播调查结果相结合。这些活动的及时性影响到执行预防措施的能力。流感监测历来因数据收集和传播方面的延误而受到阻碍。方法。我们使用统计过程控制(SPC)来评估犹他大学初级保健研究网络中护理点(POC)流感检测阳性的每日门诊访问量百分比。结果。回顾性研究发现,POC检测在4个季节(2004-2008年,流行病发病前16天中位数)中的每一个季节都会产生警报,这表明临床医生的电子邮件通知将比发布在犹他州卫生部网站上的监测警报早9天。在2008-09赛季,该算法在疫情爆发前19天发出实时警报。4个干预诊所的临床医生在4天内收到了警报的电子邮件通知。与6个对照诊所的临床医生相比,干预临床医生在通报后进行快速检测的可能性高出40% (P = 0.105),接种季节性流感疫苗的可能性高出两倍(P = 0.104)。结论。spc生成警报的电子邮件通知比传统监测提供了更早的流行病发病通知。干预诊所的临床医生预防行为差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Point-of-Care Testing as an Influenza Surveillance Tool: Methodology and Lessons Learned from Implementation.

Point-of-Care Testing as an Influenza Surveillance Tool: Methodology and Lessons Learned from Implementation.

Point-of-Care Testing as an Influenza Surveillance Tool: Methodology and Lessons Learned from Implementation.

Point-of-Care Testing as an Influenza Surveillance Tool: Methodology and Lessons Learned from Implementation.

Objectives. Disease surveillance combines data collection and analysis with dissemination of findings to decision makers. The timeliness of these activities affects the ability to implement preventive measures. Influenza surveillance has traditionally been hampered by delays in both data collection and dissemination. Methods. We used statistical process control (SPC) to evaluate the daily percentage of outpatient visits with a positive point-of-care (POC) influenza test in the University of Utah Primary Care Research Network. Results. Retrospectively, POC testing generated an alert in each of 4 seasons (2004-2008, median 16 days before epidemic onset), suggesting that email notification of clinicians would be 9 days earlier than surveillance alerts posted to the Utah Department of Health website. In the 2008-09 season, the algorithm generated a real-time alert 19 days before epidemic onset. Clinicians in 4 intervention clinics received email notification of the alert within 4 days. Compared with clinicians in 6 control clinics, intervention clinicians were 40% more likely to perform rapid testing (P = 0.105) and twice as likely to vaccinate for seasonal influenza (P = 0.104) after notification. Conclusions. Email notification of SPC-generated alerts provided significantly earlier notification of the epidemic onset than traditional surveillance. Clinician preventive behavior was not significantly different in intervention clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信