Yoonsun Chung, Hong I Yoon, Ki C Keum, Joo H Kim, Won H Choi, Ki C Nam, Woong S Koom
{"title":"腹板加膀胱压迫装置对直肠癌放疗场小肠移位的影响。","authors":"Yoonsun Chung, Hong I Yoon, Ki C Keum, Joo H Kim, Won H Choi, Ki C Nam, Woong S Koom","doi":"10.1159/000350299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a belly board (BB) with the addition of a bladder compression device (BCD) for small bowel (SB) displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans of 38 rectal cancer patients positioned on a BB were analyzed and compared with CT scans from the same patients after the addition of a BCD. The BCD moves the inferior border of the BB from the pubic symphysis to the lumbosacral junction. The treated and irradiated volumes of the SB and bladder were compared. The irradiated volume ratio of SB to abdominopelvic cavity (APC) and that of bladder to APC were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the BCD, the treated and irradiated volumes of SB decreased significantly (49.1 ± 48.0 vs. 60.9 ± 50.9 cc, p = 0.006 and 207.5 ± 140.8 vs. 482.8 ± 214.2 cc, p < 0.001, respectively). The irradiated volume ratio of bladder to APC with the BCD increased considerably compared to that without the BCD (25.2 ± 11.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), and the ratio of irradiated volume of SB to APC decreased significantly with the BCD (18.8 ± 12.4 vs. 31.8 ± 12.1%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the addition of a BCD to the BB could effectively provide further displacement of SB from the rectal cancer radiotherapy field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19684,"journal":{"name":"Onkologie","volume":"36 5","pages":"241-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000350299","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of belly board with bladder compression device on small bowel displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yoonsun Chung, Hong I Yoon, Ki C Keum, Joo H Kim, Won H Choi, Ki C Nam, Woong S Koom\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000350299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a belly board (BB) with the addition of a bladder compression device (BCD) for small bowel (SB) displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Computed tomography (CT) scans of 38 rectal cancer patients positioned on a BB were analyzed and compared with CT scans from the same patients after the addition of a BCD. The BCD moves the inferior border of the BB from the pubic symphysis to the lumbosacral junction. The treated and irradiated volumes of the SB and bladder were compared. The irradiated volume ratio of SB to abdominopelvic cavity (APC) and that of bladder to APC were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With the BCD, the treated and irradiated volumes of SB decreased significantly (49.1 ± 48.0 vs. 60.9 ± 50.9 cc, p = 0.006 and 207.5 ± 140.8 vs. 482.8 ± 214.2 cc, p < 0.001, respectively). The irradiated volume ratio of bladder to APC with the BCD increased considerably compared to that without the BCD (25.2 ± 11.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), and the ratio of irradiated volume of SB to APC decreased significantly with the BCD (18.8 ± 12.4 vs. 31.8 ± 12.1%, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that the addition of a BCD to the BB could effectively provide further displacement of SB from the rectal cancer radiotherapy field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19684,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"241-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000350299\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000350299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000350299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
背景:本研究的目的是探讨腹部板(BB)加膀胱压迫装置(BCD)治疗直肠癌放疗场小肠移位的效果。患者和方法:对38例直肠癌患者的CT扫描结果进行了分析,并与添加BCD后的CT扫描结果进行了比较。BCD将BB的下边界从耻骨联合移动到腰骶交界处。比较处理后和照射后膀胱和SB的体积。分析SB与腹腔(APC)和膀胱(APC)的辐照体积比。结果:经BCD处理的SB体积和辐照后的SB体积分别为49.1±48.0比60.9±50.9 cc (p = 0.006)和207.5±140.8比482.8±214.2 cc (p < 0.001)。有BCD的膀胱与APC的辐照体积比显著高于无BCD的膀胱(25.2±11.5比18.7±10.5%,p < 0.001),有BCD的膀胱与APC的辐照体积比显著低于无BCD的膀胱(18.8±12.4比31.8±12.1%,p < 0.001)。结论:本研究表明,在BB中添加BCD可以有效地进一步位移SB,使其远离直肠癌放疗场。
Effect of belly board with bladder compression device on small bowel displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a belly board (BB) with the addition of a bladder compression device (BCD) for small bowel (SB) displacement from the radiotherapy field for rectal cancer.
Patients and methods: Computed tomography (CT) scans of 38 rectal cancer patients positioned on a BB were analyzed and compared with CT scans from the same patients after the addition of a BCD. The BCD moves the inferior border of the BB from the pubic symphysis to the lumbosacral junction. The treated and irradiated volumes of the SB and bladder were compared. The irradiated volume ratio of SB to abdominopelvic cavity (APC) and that of bladder to APC were analyzed.
Results: With the BCD, the treated and irradiated volumes of SB decreased significantly (49.1 ± 48.0 vs. 60.9 ± 50.9 cc, p = 0.006 and 207.5 ± 140.8 vs. 482.8 ± 214.2 cc, p < 0.001, respectively). The irradiated volume ratio of bladder to APC with the BCD increased considerably compared to that without the BCD (25.2 ± 11.5 vs. 18.7 ± 10.5%, p < 0.001), and the ratio of irradiated volume of SB to APC decreased significantly with the BCD (18.8 ± 12.4 vs. 31.8 ± 12.1%, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: This study showed that the addition of a BCD to the BB could effectively provide further displacement of SB from the rectal cancer radiotherapy field.