哪些胆总管和/或胰管扩张的患者EUS检查呈阳性?

Vernon Carriere, Jason Conway, Jerry Evans, Susanne Shokoohi, Girish Mishra
{"title":"哪些胆总管和/或胰管扩张的患者EUS检查呈阳性?","authors":"Vernon Carriere,&nbsp;Jason Conway,&nbsp;Jerry Evans,&nbsp;Susanne Shokoohi,&nbsp;Girish Mishra","doi":"10.4161/jig.23739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>7mm) and/or pancreatic duct (PD) on abdominal imaging are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In many cases, the EUS shows no obvious etiology for the dilated ducts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Find clinical factors that may predict which patients are more likely to have positive findings on EUS to explain the etiologies for the dilated ducts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective database analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary-care university hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients referred for EUS for dilated CBD and/or PD from January 2004 to February 2010 were included in this study. Only patients without an obvious etiology for the dilated ducts on abdominal imaging were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>An EUS was performed by using either a radial echoendoscope or a linear endoscope to evaluate the common bile duct and/or the pancreatic duct. When appropriate fine needle aspiration of the mass or cyst was performed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>The characteristics of patients who had positive findings on EUS to explain the etiology of their dilated PD and/or CBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 64 years, 51 (36%) male and 115 (82%) white. The majority of our patients had a presenting symptom of abdominal pain 105 (75%). 49 (36%) had elevated AST or ALT, 25 (8%) had an elevated bilirubin and 13 (23%) had an elevated lipase. EUS findings explained the dilated ducts in 54 (39%) of our patients, most common diagnoses included: CBD stone in 11 (8%), non-calcific chronic pancreatitis in 9 (6%), pancreatic mass in 8 (6%), IPMN in 7 (5%). On bivarate analysis patients who were older (p = 0.006), male (p = 0.001), had elevated LFTs (p = <0.001), had elevated lipase (p = 0.021) or had dilated CBD and PD (p = 0.007) were more likely to have an etiology for their dilated duct(s) discovered on EUS.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A retrospective study with a small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older patients, males and those patients presenting with concurrent elevations in the AST/ALT and/or lipase were more likely to have an underlying etiology discovered on EUS. Furthermore, EUS may detect an undiagnosed pancreatic malignancy in patients presenting with unexplained duct dilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"2 4","pages":"168-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655388/pdf/jig0204_0168.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?\",\"authors\":\"Vernon Carriere,&nbsp;Jason Conway,&nbsp;Jerry Evans,&nbsp;Susanne Shokoohi,&nbsp;Girish Mishra\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/jig.23739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>7mm) and/or pancreatic duct (PD) on abdominal imaging are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In many cases, the EUS shows no obvious etiology for the dilated ducts.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Find clinical factors that may predict which patients are more likely to have positive findings on EUS to explain the etiologies for the dilated ducts.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective database analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary-care university hospital.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients referred for EUS for dilated CBD and/or PD from January 2004 to February 2010 were included in this study. Only patients without an obvious etiology for the dilated ducts on abdominal imaging were included.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>An EUS was performed by using either a radial echoendoscope or a linear endoscope to evaluate the common bile duct and/or the pancreatic duct. When appropriate fine needle aspiration of the mass or cyst was performed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measurements: </strong>The characteristics of patients who had positive findings on EUS to explain the etiology of their dilated PD and/or CBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 140 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 64 years, 51 (36%) male and 115 (82%) white. The majority of our patients had a presenting symptom of abdominal pain 105 (75%). 49 (36%) had elevated AST or ALT, 25 (8%) had an elevated bilirubin and 13 (23%) had an elevated lipase. EUS findings explained the dilated ducts in 54 (39%) of our patients, most common diagnoses included: CBD stone in 11 (8%), non-calcific chronic pancreatitis in 9 (6%), pancreatic mass in 8 (6%), IPMN in 7 (5%). On bivarate analysis patients who were older (p = 0.006), male (p = 0.001), had elevated LFTs (p = <0.001), had elevated lipase (p = 0.021) or had dilated CBD and PD (p = 0.007) were more likely to have an etiology for their dilated duct(s) discovered on EUS.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>A retrospective study with a small number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older patients, males and those patients presenting with concurrent elevations in the AST/ALT and/or lipase were more likely to have an underlying etiology discovered on EUS. Furthermore, EUS may detect an undiagnosed pancreatic malignancy in patients presenting with unexplained duct dilation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"168-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655388/pdf/jig0204_0168.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹部影像显示胆总管(CBD)扩张(>7mm)和/或胰管(PD)扩张的患者通常需要进行内镜超声检查(EUS)。在许多病例中,EUS未显示导管扩张的明显病因。目的:寻找能够预测哪些患者更容易出现EUS阳性结果的临床因素,以解释导管扩张的病因。设计:回顾性数据库分析。单位:大学三级医院。患者:2004年1月至2010年2月期间因扩张性CBD和/或PD而接受EUS治疗的患者纳入本研究。仅包括在腹部影像学上没有明显病因的扩张导管患者。干预措施:EUS采用放射状超声内镜或线性内镜评估胆总管和/或胰管。当适当的细针抽吸肿块或囊肿。主要结果测量:EUS阳性患者的特征来解释其扩张性PD和/或CBD的病因。结果:共纳入140例患者,平均年龄64岁,男性51例(36%),白人115例(82%)。我们的大多数患者以腹痛为主要症状105(75%)。49例(36%)有AST或ALT升高,25例(8%)有胆红素升高,13例(23%)有脂肪酶升高。EUS检查结果解释了54例(39%)患者的导管扩张,最常见的诊断包括:CBD结石11例(8%),非钙化性慢性胰腺炎9例(6%),胰腺肿块8例(6%),IPMN 7例(5%)。在双变量分析中,年龄较大(p = 0.006)、男性(p = 0.001)的患者LFTs升高(p =局限性:回顾性研究,患者数量较少)。结论:老年患者、男性和同时出现AST/ALT和/或脂肪酶升高的患者更有可能有EUS发现的潜在病因。此外,EUS可以在出现不明原因的胰管扩张的患者中发现未确诊的胰腺恶性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which patients with dilated common bile and/or pancreatic ducts have positive findings on EUS?

Background: Patients with dilated common bile duct (CBD) (>7mm) and/or pancreatic duct (PD) on abdominal imaging are often referred for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). In many cases, the EUS shows no obvious etiology for the dilated ducts.

Objective: Find clinical factors that may predict which patients are more likely to have positive findings on EUS to explain the etiologies for the dilated ducts.

Design: Retrospective database analysis.

Setting: Tertiary-care university hospital.

Patients: Patients referred for EUS for dilated CBD and/or PD from January 2004 to February 2010 were included in this study. Only patients without an obvious etiology for the dilated ducts on abdominal imaging were included.

Interventions: An EUS was performed by using either a radial echoendoscope or a linear endoscope to evaluate the common bile duct and/or the pancreatic duct. When appropriate fine needle aspiration of the mass or cyst was performed.

Main outcome measurements: The characteristics of patients who had positive findings on EUS to explain the etiology of their dilated PD and/or CBD.

Results: A total of 140 patients were included in the study with a mean age of 64 years, 51 (36%) male and 115 (82%) white. The majority of our patients had a presenting symptom of abdominal pain 105 (75%). 49 (36%) had elevated AST or ALT, 25 (8%) had an elevated bilirubin and 13 (23%) had an elevated lipase. EUS findings explained the dilated ducts in 54 (39%) of our patients, most common diagnoses included: CBD stone in 11 (8%), non-calcific chronic pancreatitis in 9 (6%), pancreatic mass in 8 (6%), IPMN in 7 (5%). On bivarate analysis patients who were older (p = 0.006), male (p = 0.001), had elevated LFTs (p = <0.001), had elevated lipase (p = 0.021) or had dilated CBD and PD (p = 0.007) were more likely to have an etiology for their dilated duct(s) discovered on EUS.

Limitations: A retrospective study with a small number of patients.

Conclusion: Older patients, males and those patients presenting with concurrent elevations in the AST/ALT and/or lipase were more likely to have an underlying etiology discovered on EUS. Furthermore, EUS may detect an undiagnosed pancreatic malignancy in patients presenting with unexplained duct dilation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信