骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁-盆底中心的经验:短期结果。

Roberto Paolo Iachetta, Alessandra Cola, Roberto Dino Villani
{"title":"骶神经刺激治疗大便失禁-盆底中心的经验:短期结果。","authors":"Roberto Paolo Iachetta,&nbsp;Alessandra Cola,&nbsp;Roberto Dino Villani","doi":"10.4161/jig.23745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this paper is to present the data pertinent to the experiences of our Pelvic Floor Center on the utilisation of SNS in the treatment of fecal incontinence and compare these data to the data of current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who had had SNS treatment for fecal incontinence between the dates of 1st April 2008 and 1st April 2011 were enrolled in the study. We considered a 50% reduction of fecal incontinence episodes as a success of the test phase. The score used for assessment was the Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence score (CCF-FI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 21 patients treated for fecal incontinence (19 ♀ and 2 ♂, average age 59.7 [ 26-73] years) were sub-divided on the basis of the presence or absence of sphincter damage (group A1 had damage while group A2 did not). A patient (group A1) was excluded from the study as the result of the external connector breaking during the test phase. Of the 20 remaining patients (9 from group A1 and 11 from A2), 14 (70%) felt benefit and subsequently underwent definitive stimulator implantation. The variation between the pre-operative CCF-FI and the value at 6 months was statistically significant both in group A1 (p=0.009) and in group A2 (p=0.003). The only complication reported was one case (7.1%) of infection of the definitive stimulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNS represents an effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. The results have been encouraging, and in line with current literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":89416,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","volume":"2 4","pages":"189-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655392/pdf/jig0204_0189.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence - the experience of a pelvic floor center : short term results.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Paolo Iachetta,&nbsp;Alessandra Cola,&nbsp;Roberto Dino Villani\",\"doi\":\"10.4161/jig.23745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this paper is to present the data pertinent to the experiences of our Pelvic Floor Center on the utilisation of SNS in the treatment of fecal incontinence and compare these data to the data of current literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who had had SNS treatment for fecal incontinence between the dates of 1st April 2008 and 1st April 2011 were enrolled in the study. We considered a 50% reduction of fecal incontinence episodes as a success of the test phase. The score used for assessment was the Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence score (CCF-FI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 21 patients treated for fecal incontinence (19 ♀ and 2 ♂, average age 59.7 [ 26-73] years) were sub-divided on the basis of the presence or absence of sphincter damage (group A1 had damage while group A2 did not). A patient (group A1) was excluded from the study as the result of the external connector breaking during the test phase. Of the 20 remaining patients (9 from group A1 and 11 from A2), 14 (70%) felt benefit and subsequently underwent definitive stimulator implantation. The variation between the pre-operative CCF-FI and the value at 6 months was statistically significant both in group A1 (p=0.009) and in group A2 (p=0.003). The only complication reported was one case (7.1%) of infection of the definitive stimulator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SNS represents an effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. The results have been encouraging, and in line with current literature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"189-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3655392/pdf/jig0204_0189.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interventional gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interventional gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4161/jig.23745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

目的:本文的目的是介绍我们盆底中心在使用SNS治疗大便失禁方面的经验数据,并将这些数据与当前文献的数据进行比较。方法:所有2008年4月1日至2011年4月1日期间接受SNS治疗的大便失禁患者纳入研究。我们认为测试阶段成功减少了50%的大便失禁。用于评估的评分是佛罗里达克利夫兰诊所粪便失禁评分(CCF-FI)。结果:21例大便失禁患者(母19例,公2例,平均年龄59.7[26-73]岁)根据有无括约肌损伤进行细分(A1组有损伤,A2组无损伤)。1例患者(A1组)在测试阶段由于外部连接器断裂而被排除在研究之外。在剩余的20例患者中(A1组9例,A2组11例),14例(70%)感到获益,随后接受了明确的刺激器植入。A1组术前CCF-FI与6个月时CCF-FI差异有统计学意义(p=0.009), A2组差异有统计学意义(p=0.003)。唯一报告的并发症是1例(7.1%)最终刺激器感染。结论:SNS是治疗大便失禁的有效方法。研究结果令人鼓舞,与目前的文献一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence - the experience of a pelvic floor center : short term results.

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to present the data pertinent to the experiences of our Pelvic Floor Center on the utilisation of SNS in the treatment of fecal incontinence and compare these data to the data of current literature.

Methods: All patients who had had SNS treatment for fecal incontinence between the dates of 1st April 2008 and 1st April 2011 were enrolled in the study. We considered a 50% reduction of fecal incontinence episodes as a success of the test phase. The score used for assessment was the Cleveland Clinic Florida-Fecal Incontinence score (CCF-FI).

Results: The 21 patients treated for fecal incontinence (19 ♀ and 2 ♂, average age 59.7 [ 26-73] years) were sub-divided on the basis of the presence or absence of sphincter damage (group A1 had damage while group A2 did not). A patient (group A1) was excluded from the study as the result of the external connector breaking during the test phase. Of the 20 remaining patients (9 from group A1 and 11 from A2), 14 (70%) felt benefit and subsequently underwent definitive stimulator implantation. The variation between the pre-operative CCF-FI and the value at 6 months was statistically significant both in group A1 (p=0.009) and in group A2 (p=0.003). The only complication reported was one case (7.1%) of infection of the definitive stimulator.

Conclusion: SNS represents an effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. The results have been encouraging, and in line with current literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信