Campath、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂减少和慢性同种异体移植肾病(3C)研究:背景、原理和研究方案

Richard Haynes, Colin Baigent, Paul Harden, Martin Landray, Murat Akyol, Argiris Asderakis, Alex Baxter, Sunil Bhandari, Paramit Chowdhury, Marc Clancy, Jonathan Emberson, Paul Gibbs, Abdul Hammad, Will Herrington, Kathy Jayne, Gareth Jones, Nithya Krishnan, Michael Lay, David Lewis, Iain Macdougall, Chidambaram Nathan, James Neuberger, Chas Newstead, Ravi Pararajasingam, Carmelo Puliatti, Keith Rigg, Peter Rowe, Adnan Sharif, Neil Sheerin, Sanjay Sinha, Chris Watson, Peter Friend
{"title":"Campath、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂减少和慢性同种异体移植肾病(3C)研究:背景、原理和研究方案","authors":"Richard Haynes, Colin Baigent, Paul Harden, Martin Landray, Murat Akyol, Argiris Asderakis, Alex Baxter, Sunil Bhandari, Paramit Chowdhury, Marc Clancy, Jonathan Emberson, Paul Gibbs, Abdul Hammad, Will Herrington, Kathy Jayne, Gareth Jones, Nithya Krishnan, Michael Lay, David Lewis, Iain Macdougall, Chidambaram Nathan, James Neuberger, Chas Newstead, Ravi Pararajasingam, Carmelo Puliatti, Keith Rigg, Peter Rowe, Adnan Sharif, Neil Sheerin, Sanjay Sinha, Chris Watson, Peter Friend","doi":"10.1186/2047-1440-2-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal failure, but uncertainty remains about the best immunosuppression strategy. Long-term graft survival has not improved substantially, and one possible explanation is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNI exposure could be minimized by using more potent induction therapy or alternative maintenance therapy to remove CNIs completely. However, the safety and efficacy of such strategies are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor reduction and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) Study is a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial with 852 participants which is addressing two important questions in kidney transplantation. The first question is whether a Campath (alemtuzumab)-based induction therapy strategy is superior to basiliximab-based therapy, and the second is whether, from 6 months after transplantation, a sirolimus-based maintenance therapy strategy is superior to tacrolimus-based therapy. Recruitment is complete, and follow-up will continue for around 5 years post-transplant. The primary endpoint for the induction therapy comparison is biopsy-proven acute rejection by 6 months, and the primary endpoint for the maintenance therapy comparison is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 2 years after transplantation. The study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and endorsed by the British Transplantation Society, and 18 centers for adult kidney transplant are participating.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Late graft failure is a major issue for kidney-transplant recipients. If our hypothesis that minimizing CNI exposure with Campath-based induction therapy and/or an elective conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance therapy can improve long-term graft function and survival is correct, then patients should experience better graft function for longer. A positive outcome could change clinical practice in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120028 and ISRCTN88894088.</p>","PeriodicalId":89864,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation research","volume":"2 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Campath, calcineurin inhibitor reduction and chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) study: background, rationale, and study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Richard Haynes, Colin Baigent, Paul Harden, Martin Landray, Murat Akyol, Argiris Asderakis, Alex Baxter, Sunil Bhandari, Paramit Chowdhury, Marc Clancy, Jonathan Emberson, Paul Gibbs, Abdul Hammad, Will Herrington, Kathy Jayne, Gareth Jones, Nithya Krishnan, Michael Lay, David Lewis, Iain Macdougall, Chidambaram Nathan, James Neuberger, Chas Newstead, Ravi Pararajasingam, Carmelo Puliatti, Keith Rigg, Peter Rowe, Adnan Sharif, Neil Sheerin, Sanjay Sinha, Chris Watson, Peter Friend\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/2047-1440-2-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal failure, but uncertainty remains about the best immunosuppression strategy. Long-term graft survival has not improved substantially, and one possible explanation is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNI exposure could be minimized by using more potent induction therapy or alternative maintenance therapy to remove CNIs completely. However, the safety and efficacy of such strategies are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods/design: </strong>The Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor reduction and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) Study is a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial with 852 participants which is addressing two important questions in kidney transplantation. The first question is whether a Campath (alemtuzumab)-based induction therapy strategy is superior to basiliximab-based therapy, and the second is whether, from 6 months after transplantation, a sirolimus-based maintenance therapy strategy is superior to tacrolimus-based therapy. Recruitment is complete, and follow-up will continue for around 5 years post-transplant. The primary endpoint for the induction therapy comparison is biopsy-proven acute rejection by 6 months, and the primary endpoint for the maintenance therapy comparison is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 2 years after transplantation. The study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and endorsed by the British Transplantation Society, and 18 centers for adult kidney transplant are participating.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Late graft failure is a major issue for kidney-transplant recipients. If our hypothesis that minimizing CNI exposure with Campath-based induction therapy and/or an elective conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance therapy can improve long-term graft function and survival is correct, then patients should experience better graft function for longer. A positive outcome could change clinical practice in kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120028 and ISRCTN88894088.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation research\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3674985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-2-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-1440-2-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植是终末期肾衰竭患者的最佳治疗方法,但最佳免疫抑制策略仍不确定。移植物的长期存活率并没有显著提高,一个可能的解释是钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的肾毒性。通过使用更有效的诱导疗法或替代维持疗法来完全清除CNI,可以最大限度地减少CNI暴露。然而,这些策略的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。方法/设计:Campath、钙调磷酸酶抑制剂减少和慢性同种异体肾病(3C)研究是一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,共有852名参与者,旨在解决肾移植中的两个重要问题。第一个问题是基于Campath(阿仑单抗)的诱导治疗策略是否优于基于basiliximumab的治疗,第二个问题是,从移植后6个月开始,基于西罗莫司的维持治疗策略是否优于基于他克莫司的治疗。招募完成,移植后随访约5年。诱导治疗组比较的主要终点是移植后6个月活检证实的急性排斥反应,维持治疗组比较的主要终点是移植后2年肾小球滤过率的变化。这项研究由牛津大学赞助,并得到了英国移植协会的认可,18个成人肾脏移植中心参与了这项研究。讨论:晚期移植衰竭是肾移植受者的主要问题。如果我们的假设是正确的,即通过基于运动的诱导治疗和/或选择性地转换为基于西罗莫司的维持治疗来减少CNI暴露可以改善长期移植物功能和生存,那么患者应该在更长时间内体验更好的移植物功能。积极的结果可能会改变肾移植的临床实践。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120028和ISRCTN88894088。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Campath, calcineurin inhibitor reduction and chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) study: background, rationale, and study protocol.

Campath, calcineurin inhibitor reduction and chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) study: background, rationale, and study protocol.

Background: Kidney transplantation is the best treatment for patients with end-stage renal failure, but uncertainty remains about the best immunosuppression strategy. Long-term graft survival has not improved substantially, and one possible explanation is calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) nephrotoxicity. CNI exposure could be minimized by using more potent induction therapy or alternative maintenance therapy to remove CNIs completely. However, the safety and efficacy of such strategies are unknown.

Methods/design: The Campath, Calcineurin inhibitor reduction and Chronic allograft nephropathy (3C) Study is a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial with 852 participants which is addressing two important questions in kidney transplantation. The first question is whether a Campath (alemtuzumab)-based induction therapy strategy is superior to basiliximab-based therapy, and the second is whether, from 6 months after transplantation, a sirolimus-based maintenance therapy strategy is superior to tacrolimus-based therapy. Recruitment is complete, and follow-up will continue for around 5 years post-transplant. The primary endpoint for the induction therapy comparison is biopsy-proven acute rejection by 6 months, and the primary endpoint for the maintenance therapy comparison is change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline to 2 years after transplantation. The study is sponsored by the University of Oxford and endorsed by the British Transplantation Society, and 18 centers for adult kidney transplant are participating.

Discussion: Late graft failure is a major issue for kidney-transplant recipients. If our hypothesis that minimizing CNI exposure with Campath-based induction therapy and/or an elective conversion to sirolimus-based maintenance therapy can improve long-term graft function and survival is correct, then patients should experience better graft function for longer. A positive outcome could change clinical practice in kidney transplantation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01120028 and ISRCTN88894088.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信