Jennifer L Peterson, Steven J Buskirk, Michael G Heckman, Alexander S Parker, Nancy N Diehl, Katherine S Tzou, Nitesh N Paryani, Stephen J Ko, Larry C Daugherty, Laura A Vallow, Thomas M Pisansky
{"title":"评价血清钙作为前列腺癌补救性放射治疗后生化复发的预测因子。","authors":"Jennifer L Peterson, Steven J Buskirk, Michael G Heckman, Alexander S Parker, Nancy N Diehl, Katherine S Tzou, Nitesh N Paryani, Stephen J Ko, Larry C Daugherty, Laura A Vallow, Thomas M Pisansky","doi":"10.1155/2013/239241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background. Previous reports have shown a positive association between serum calcium level and prostate cancer mortality. However, there is no data regarding whether higher serum calcium levels are associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. Herein, we evaluate the association between pretreatment serum calcium levels and BCR in a cohort of men who underwent SRT. Methods. We evaluated 165 patients who underwent SRT at our institution. Median dose was 65.0 Gy (range: 54.0-72.4 Gy). We considered serum calcium as both a continuous variable and a 3-level categorical variable (low [≤9.0 mg/dL], moderate [>9.0 mg/dL and ≤9.35 mg/dL], and high [>9.35 mg/dL]) based on sample tertiles. Results. We observed no evidence of a linear association between serum calcium and BCR (relative risk (RR): 0.96, P = 0.76). Compared to men with low calcium, there was no significantly increased risk of BCR for men with moderate (RR: 0.94, P = 0.79) or high (RR: 1.08, P = 0.76) serum calcium levels. Adjustment for clinical, pathological, and SRT characteristics in multivariable analyses did not alter these findings. Conclusion. Our results provide evidence that pretreatment serum calcium is unlikely to be a useful tool in predicting BCR risk following SRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":89399,"journal":{"name":"ISRN oncology","volume":"2013 ","pages":"239241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/239241","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Serum Calcium as a Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence following Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer L Peterson, Steven J Buskirk, Michael G Heckman, Alexander S Parker, Nancy N Diehl, Katherine S Tzou, Nitesh N Paryani, Stephen J Ko, Larry C Daugherty, Laura A Vallow, Thomas M Pisansky\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2013/239241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background. Previous reports have shown a positive association between serum calcium level and prostate cancer mortality. However, there is no data regarding whether higher serum calcium levels are associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. Herein, we evaluate the association between pretreatment serum calcium levels and BCR in a cohort of men who underwent SRT. Methods. We evaluated 165 patients who underwent SRT at our institution. Median dose was 65.0 Gy (range: 54.0-72.4 Gy). We considered serum calcium as both a continuous variable and a 3-level categorical variable (low [≤9.0 mg/dL], moderate [>9.0 mg/dL and ≤9.35 mg/dL], and high [>9.35 mg/dL]) based on sample tertiles. Results. We observed no evidence of a linear association between serum calcium and BCR (relative risk (RR): 0.96, P = 0.76). Compared to men with low calcium, there was no significantly increased risk of BCR for men with moderate (RR: 0.94, P = 0.79) or high (RR: 1.08, P = 0.76) serum calcium levels. Adjustment for clinical, pathological, and SRT characteristics in multivariable analyses did not alter these findings. Conclusion. Our results provide evidence that pretreatment serum calcium is unlikely to be a useful tool in predicting BCR risk following SRT.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":89399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"volume\":\"2013 \",\"pages\":\"239241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2013/239241\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/239241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/239241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景。先前的报告显示血钙水平与前列腺癌死亡率呈正相关。然而,目前还没有关于血清钙水平升高是否与前列腺癌补救性放射治疗(SRT)后生化复发(BCR)风险增加相关的数据。在此,我们评估了接受SRT的男性队列中预处理血清钙水平与BCR之间的关系。方法。我们对我院接受SRT的165例患者进行了评估。中位剂量为65.0 Gy(范围:54.0-72.4 Gy)。我们认为血清钙既是一个连续变量,也是一个基于样品三分位数的三水平分类变量(低[≤9.0 mg/dL],中[>9.0 mg/dL和≤9.35 mg/dL]和高[>9.35 mg/dL])。结果。我们观察到血清钙和BCR之间没有线性关联的证据(相对危险度(RR): 0.96, P = 0.76)。与低钙的男性相比,中等(RR: 0.94, P = 0.79)或高(RR: 1.08, P = 0.76)血钙水平的男性BCR的风险没有显著增加。在多变量分析中调整临床、病理和SRT特征并没有改变这些发现。结论。我们的结果提供了证据,表明预处理血清钙不太可能是预测SRT后BCR风险的有用工具。
Evaluation of Serum Calcium as a Predictor of Biochemical Recurrence following Salvage Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Background. Previous reports have shown a positive association between serum calcium level and prostate cancer mortality. However, there is no data regarding whether higher serum calcium levels are associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) following salvage radiation therapy (SRT) for prostate cancer. Herein, we evaluate the association between pretreatment serum calcium levels and BCR in a cohort of men who underwent SRT. Methods. We evaluated 165 patients who underwent SRT at our institution. Median dose was 65.0 Gy (range: 54.0-72.4 Gy). We considered serum calcium as both a continuous variable and a 3-level categorical variable (low [≤9.0 mg/dL], moderate [>9.0 mg/dL and ≤9.35 mg/dL], and high [>9.35 mg/dL]) based on sample tertiles. Results. We observed no evidence of a linear association between serum calcium and BCR (relative risk (RR): 0.96, P = 0.76). Compared to men with low calcium, there was no significantly increased risk of BCR for men with moderate (RR: 0.94, P = 0.79) or high (RR: 1.08, P = 0.76) serum calcium levels. Adjustment for clinical, pathological, and SRT characteristics in multivariable analyses did not alter these findings. Conclusion. Our results provide evidence that pretreatment serum calcium is unlikely to be a useful tool in predicting BCR risk following SRT.