改变的共识:父母和专业人士对儿童临终关怀的看法。

Jayne Price, Joanne Jordan, Lindsay Prior
{"title":"改变的共识:父母和专业人士对儿童临终关怀的看法。","authors":"Jayne Price,&nbsp;Joanne Jordan,&nbsp;Lindsay Prior","doi":"10.3109/01460862.2013.779765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to investigate health and social care professionals' perspectives on developing services for children with life limiting conditions at the end-of-life using issues identified by bereaved parents as priorities. The study adopted qualitative methodology using nominal group technique in focus groups (n = 5) to collect data from 35 health and social care professionals. Six issues were identified across professional groupings as particularly challenging within the context of caring for children at the end-of-life: truth telling; symptom management; communication with, and relationships between families and professionals; emotional impact, the withdrawal of feeding or treatment and sibling support. Strong resonance was noted between professionals and parents in the emphasis placed on issues related to talking about death (to child and siblings) and decision-making about the withdrawal of treatment. Conversely, late referral to hospice care and lack of services in the community dominated accounts of parents whose children had non malignant conditions, but were not prioritized by professionals. Although the latter focused on the need for and challenges associated with optimizing symptom management, most parents viewed symptom control as highly effective. Caring for a dying child is a multidimensional experience for both parents and professionals. Convergence of thinking carries three main implications for service development. Firstly, the need for \"joined up\" palliative care services, particularly concerning timely referral to the range of support services. Secondly, more structured bereavement services. Third, within an ethos of family centered care, needs of siblings should be addressed effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":75953,"journal":{"name":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","volume":"36 1-2","pages":"70-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2013.779765","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A consensus for change: parent and professional perspectives on care for children at the end-of-life.\",\"authors\":\"Jayne Price,&nbsp;Joanne Jordan,&nbsp;Lindsay Prior\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/01460862.2013.779765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to investigate health and social care professionals' perspectives on developing services for children with life limiting conditions at the end-of-life using issues identified by bereaved parents as priorities. The study adopted qualitative methodology using nominal group technique in focus groups (n = 5) to collect data from 35 health and social care professionals. Six issues were identified across professional groupings as particularly challenging within the context of caring for children at the end-of-life: truth telling; symptom management; communication with, and relationships between families and professionals; emotional impact, the withdrawal of feeding or treatment and sibling support. Strong resonance was noted between professionals and parents in the emphasis placed on issues related to talking about death (to child and siblings) and decision-making about the withdrawal of treatment. Conversely, late referral to hospice care and lack of services in the community dominated accounts of parents whose children had non malignant conditions, but were not prioritized by professionals. Although the latter focused on the need for and challenges associated with optimizing symptom management, most parents viewed symptom control as highly effective. Caring for a dying child is a multidimensional experience for both parents and professionals. Convergence of thinking carries three main implications for service development. Firstly, the need for \\\"joined up\\\" palliative care services, particularly concerning timely referral to the range of support services. Secondly, more structured bereavement services. Third, within an ethos of family centered care, needs of siblings should be addressed effectively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing\",\"volume\":\"36 1-2\",\"pages\":\"70-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/01460862.2013.779765\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2013.779765\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2013/4/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in comprehensive pediatric nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2013.779765","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2013/4/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

本研究的目的是调查健康和社会护理专业人员对在生命末期为有生命限制条件的儿童提供服务的观点,并将丧失亲人的父母确定的问题作为优先事项。本研究采用定性方法,在焦点小组中使用名义小组技术(n = 5)收集35名卫生和社会保健专业人员的数据。在照顾临终儿童的过程中,有六个问题在专业群体中被确定为特别具有挑战性:说实话;症状管理;与家人及专业人士的沟通及关系;情感影响,停止喂养或治疗和兄弟姐妹的支持。专业人员和家长在强调谈论死亡(对孩子和兄弟姐妹)和关于停止治疗的决策等问题上产生了强烈的共鸣。相反,转介到临终关怀的时间过晚和社区服务的缺乏占主导地位的父母的孩子有非恶性疾病,但没有优先考虑的专业人士。尽管后者侧重于优化症状管理的需求和挑战,但大多数家长认为症状控制是非常有效的。照顾一个垂死的孩子对父母和专业人士来说都是一个多维度的体验。对于服务开发,思想的融合有三个主要含义。首先,需要“联合”的姑息治疗服务,特别是在及时转诊到一系列支助服务方面。第二,更加结构化的丧亲服务。第三,在以家庭为中心的护理理念下,兄弟姐妹的需求应该得到有效解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A consensus for change: parent and professional perspectives on care for children at the end-of-life.

The objective of this study was to investigate health and social care professionals' perspectives on developing services for children with life limiting conditions at the end-of-life using issues identified by bereaved parents as priorities. The study adopted qualitative methodology using nominal group technique in focus groups (n = 5) to collect data from 35 health and social care professionals. Six issues were identified across professional groupings as particularly challenging within the context of caring for children at the end-of-life: truth telling; symptom management; communication with, and relationships between families and professionals; emotional impact, the withdrawal of feeding or treatment and sibling support. Strong resonance was noted between professionals and parents in the emphasis placed on issues related to talking about death (to child and siblings) and decision-making about the withdrawal of treatment. Conversely, late referral to hospice care and lack of services in the community dominated accounts of parents whose children had non malignant conditions, but were not prioritized by professionals. Although the latter focused on the need for and challenges associated with optimizing symptom management, most parents viewed symptom control as highly effective. Caring for a dying child is a multidimensional experience for both parents and professionals. Convergence of thinking carries three main implications for service development. Firstly, the need for "joined up" palliative care services, particularly concerning timely referral to the range of support services. Secondly, more structured bereavement services. Third, within an ethos of family centered care, needs of siblings should be addressed effectively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信